What is Empirical Probability anyway? Empirical Probability is where the 2nd law of thermodynamics goes badly wrong. Usually it appears that gravity is responsible. My research, given the thermodynamic radiometer proof that gravity's is the net input of energy into a system or conglomeration actually transforms the laws of thermodynamics in a way I never initially realized. So then the 2nd law of thermodynamics is not only flawed and in need of a law to replace it. Entropy is really at severe risk of disappearing as a viable concept. That is because simple convergence of energy at a point is enough to contradict the whole scientific concept of entropy. Well what then is a point? A point is the convergence of energy and we know that energy will not converge without mass being available as a means of "inducting" it. If we refresh the idea that mass and energy can be converted from one to the other then a point is simply energy plus mater know to be converted to energy under the right conditions.) So like the summation equation from the new laws of physics I published years ago, E + M*=P such that E is free energy added to a Mass form of energy for the total energy of the entire system P which is our point. Sounds way too obvious? since I originally published that thesis I never got around to updating it with some sense that maybe Mass is not converted to just energy but maybe has other components or does not actually convert at all given the mass defect problem. In which case E + M*** = P so it really does not mater except that it destroys Entropy as viable scientific concept.
With the best of our labeling super novae's phenomenology seen in Hubble telescope photographs we see anything but entropy result. We see bilateral symmetry. That is still empirical probability. I actually reinterpret those photos as being the aftermath of giant collisions and not of dying stars because of that bilateral symmetry. The issue being entropy is that the destruction of a star in a super nova is anything but tending toward entropy given that all too obvious symmetry which has almost the appearance of a mirror image to it. What we actually see is a more orderly event where total destruction of an enormous entity is enabling empirical probability with an almost infinite discharge of energy and an almost infinite destruction of mater, system, perhaps even time and space.
The gravitational center is being discharged but at the same time we see eddies forming in the aftermath at a cold distance from the center of discharge. Entropy if it exists in the explosion , the moment of explosion or the event of super nova is very short lived. A super nova should be the ultimate entropy event? The observed symmetry raises grave concerns for the future of the 2nd law of thermodynamics until I have modified it as : "Empirical probability is the future of any thermodynamic system." Now don't quote me on that yet. I have not got the right semantics yet. It took a long time to advance to the concept and nomenclature of Empirical probability from multi variable probability (which it still is) . Maybe the correct term is Retropy. or Reretropy. Yes It is Retropy. Lex Retropy to be exact. Retropy means regrowth of a system because empirical probability is one of the basic dimensions of the cosmos. It is because components of mass and of energy whether the same or different have inherent empirical probability as the nature of their structures which is why multi variable probability with the semblance of order in the cosmos is a basic dimension. It is the component of reality that frames our reference.
Something that frames our reference is generic probability of energy and mass as energy but because of mass defect I suspect that really the core of what makes mater different from energy is the probability dimension. This maybe the reason why energy has no effect in space until it is absorbed or interacts with mass. That little key to the universe is a sub atomic particle I will call the Lexitrophe in a process of Lexitrophiphy. It is the cause of retropy and reretropy which the apparent entropy of retropy. The only reason we have any frame of reference is because of Euclidean like points in space where mater and energy combine or where energy combines to form mater and where mater takes a form that leads to predictable probabilities like symmetry.
