Blowing A Hole Wide Enough To Swallow A Mile: Decoding God and the wrong approach to scientific beliefs.

What is superposition? - ‎What is quantum? - ‎What is quantum theory?

Schrödinger's Cat  thought experiment .  What happens when the thought experiments predetermines the fate of a cat?  Your thoughts have influenced the outcomes by defining probabilities and by fabricating the narrative or if you prefer the outcomes/ by cause and effect.  Sure there are a large number of permutations.  Say the outcome of a cat being alive or dead is 50/50  That means a very rough estimate with an infinite number of trials for anything to be exactly 50/50  and for 50/50 there can be an infinite number of variables.  Perhaps an infinite variables will lead to such round numbers.    If you flipped a coin enough times and it had to hit the ground first after trillions of trials it will become impossible to determine which worn side of the coin was heads and which used to be tails.  50/50 is a blended notion not one necessarily observed in nature with all of the natural complexities.

The fascinating thing about Schodinger's cat is the though proposal having a fixed number of combinations that  include.  Alive and Dead.  Dead and Alive, Not dead  and Alive,  Not Alive and dead, Both dead and Alive.  These do not even include the added variables of atomic particles , poisons, breaking glass and thinking about it all.  God himself is a thought experiment.  Either God has a name or does not  that already increases the number of variables .  To think that DNA coding is the work of a higher power unless you are talking about raw probability of conditional variables with variable outcome is missing the higher spirit of the analysis.  If God exists he is a probability generator and that alone can build a systematic code like DNA that creates its own probabilities.

Spinoza's Notion that God is Nature is almost the proper definition....Almost ...that is except that If there is a God he or it is total probabilty of multiple variables.

Assuming the theory of the big bang is correct.  I certainly am no believer , but assuming this big bang happened and it was the cause of all subsequent effects and the cosmos and that that is Spinoza's notion of God being nature then it is a theory that needs major modification because for the big bang to have ever happened is a pure mater of probability.   As the theory goes.  In Nature, all of mass and energy were originally deposited in the singularity of a super dense gravitational mass, a super sized black hole containing virtually everything in the entire Universe so the theory goes.  That is almost poetic. Which maybe why the sad old theory of the singularity that goes big bang is so enticing to so many.




But wait for the big bang to have come from this massive density of infinite singularity of mass and energy it had to reach critical mass in the same sort of way that a nuclear bomb will have to have critical mass to begin with and after that it needs  a trigger or a point of no return from which there is no other future prospect than a big bang to have that big bang.  Many conditions have to be met by the theory of the big bang in order for any of it to have ever happened. First, somehow, somewhere, at some time, all of the elements of mass and energy had to come together and become compressed in one entity before something triggered the massive explosion called the big bang.  That is a sequence or even a code much like the reels in an old fashioned slot machine designed to simulate natural probability.    First all conditions have to be right each one clicking into place like the characters on the reels lining up and having each to satisfy the conditionality of multiple variations that are possible  until eventually the jackpot is hit and there is a big bang.


Say the president never really intended to negotiate with Iran and instead of having peace talks actually intended to bomb all their nuclear facilities without warning, First he would need to have the nuclear weapons necessary for the job selected and put into place  with code to launch them and code to direct them on missiles directly to their targets and there have to be codes and keys entered to get the nuclear bomb to have its big bang with variables as to when , where, delivery , timing plus the bomb has to be loaded and ready with critical mass.  So the same with the theory of the big bang.  All about conditional multi-variable probability that  there should be a big bang or just a small big bang over Iran. If A  and B then C?  God then has to be probability as the determining factor of everything that the periodic table can and DNA can code into existence.  That does not sound very scientific until you put it into a mathematic formula to define god which then has every thing to do with those simulation casino slot machine reel configuration where in order to receive the major big bang jackpot all the reels have to line up such that  aces or cherries all line up on a line that is also happening to be yet another conditional probability for a jackpot to occur. So it goes like this: If all the conditions are met a big bang is likely if not inevitable because that is not necessarily known.  Maybe something other than a big bang could have otherwise happened instead?


One can open a combination lock on a safe by knowing a set of calibrated moves for the dial of lock.  These safes can only be opened with the right combination of numbers...