Probablility is 100 Percent of the Tme an Expectation of Coincidence.

Every outcome in probability is a coincidence. Every coincidence can me made into a mater of calculation of probabilities. Sooner or later every possible coincidence should occur. It seems to us humans that unexpected things happing when something else is happening is a coincidence is only a fallacy . Why shouldn't coincidences always be occurring. When it comes to our genes being replicated in all the cells in our body that certainly would not be a coincidence. It seems like a coincidence when you meet you aunt by accident as a tourist on the other side of the world? Well maybe not. Not a coincidence at all . If all the laws of physics and of the natural order of things can work in multiple locations and even beyond at great distances in the cosmos, then the probability says it makes perfect sense. As it happens everything else that happens that we don't consider to be any special type of coincidence is also just as much of a coincidence itself.

Simple Proof Shows Entropy Does Not Exist.

If Entropy or the tendency towards system decline exists as a law of nature, thermodynamics then that law of nature and definition has to be modified. My thinking is that the modification is to say limited entropy in fixed systems probably exists. The problem is the notion of the entire universe tending toward an entropic state does not have supporting data. Where do I find supporting data? I say there is at least , maybe at most 14 billion years of supporting data. That is 14 billion years of light transmissions to telescopes on and around the earth. The 14 billion light year distance is a bit of an absurd number since galaxies thought to be in the deepest cosmic field have structures that are exactly the same as much more "modern" galaxies much closer to the earth in light years. We can immediately extend the age of the universe knowing that deep field galaxies are seen after 14 billion years of light transmission because it might take a galaxy more than a few billion years to assume that form as it does with more modern closer galaxies. Aside from that problem of distances and suspected age of the universe as a discrepancy of science, entropy as a law of physics also finds itself in question. One should expect, if entropy is a rule and law of nature that a galaxy a few million light years from earth should have more indicators of entropy in longer term decline than a more ancient galaxy some fallaciously assume was quickly generated after the big bang about 14 billion years ago. That is absurd since the deep field is in all direction around us and not concentrated at some spot in the sky where everything could have originated. Entropy if it existed would mean that the laws of physics should be quite different in the deepest most ancients corners of the known universe especially if there had been a big bang. The familiar structures of spiral and barred galaxies we see at close range are visible in the dark field only there they can appear to be closer together. So if we want to prove that entropy is correct we must do the following: 1. We need to prove that the laws of physics and nature are not the same the further we go back in cosmic history. 2. we need to prove that more modern manifestations of physics has suffered a decline in regenerative traits over time such that we, if we assume we are the most modern phase of cosmic reality , are in an entropic decline more than more a more structured past. 3. We need to figure out why our laws of physics and our perceptions about mathematic order in our physical reality are able to regenerate themselves. 4. We have to have an experiment where not just a system declines but where laws of physics just stop working or work more intermittently. No such experiment exists. For a while cold fusion experimentation seemed to be something like that but more ongoing tests showed a tendency for labs to repeat results. Where can we find an example of a decline from which no regeneration of patterns was possible longer term? Not from the astronomical data we have going back some 14 billion years. The conclusion is the proof that astronomical data assuming the most distant galaxies and cosmic features are time gone by or even some sort of time machine where we look back into the distant past because there is no entropy in any of that data. What then is entropy? It can remain the second law of thermodynamics but has to be modified as defined. Entropy is a decline in a thermodynamic system one with set non regenerative reflexive properties. A bomb blows up. Energy is released and the bomb is not going to regenerate itself after the explosion to repeat the cycle. It maybe true that a star or a galaxy blowing up also might not immediately be able to regenerate itself. There can still be system entropy just not cosmic laws of physics progressive entropy.