Tuesday, June 28, 2016
Almost Finally The New Laws Of Physics. Fully Updated and corrected .
I almost have it done. Photon Radiation, Gravity and Magnetism are all phenomena that work according to the inverse square law....The reason for this is that none of these have any mass, none transmit energy though space or time, none of these have properties of waves or frequencies. All of them originate in actual sources composed of mater. Finally I am no longer as clueless about what is going on ....the errors in the original physics texts are even more obvious than ever. Inverse square law phenomena are transmitting code not mass or energy. Ever wonder why atoms shed infrared and other photons instead of retaining them longer term? It is because they have no need for retention. Objects that were hot have shed infrared photons and they may have since cooled. Energy states of mater actually tend to some less active state while at the same time they have hidden if not invisible energy that only manifests itself under certain circumstances. So it seems Newton's basic laws need a updating and revisions. The latest is published elsewhere already but refining it all is what is still being worked on .
Monday, June 20, 2016
Discounting impossible metrics and looking for a metric of momentum motion and collision avoidance
Still working on the new laws of physics. That metric shown in illustrations of warp due to space/time Gravity/ mass is supposed to be a metric in space. if space is empty though the metric of distance can't be warped . To demonstrate warping stuff has to be in space and be observed as warping. The whole relativity thing makes the metric the speed of light and the assumption is made that light has mass and therefore follows the warps with the warped space time out there. If you learn that photons have no mass than all that metric stuff instantly goes poof. The only metric then is proximity as per masses in Newtonian gravity and /or the potential of objects colliding with each other and releasing significant amounts of energy . So then there is a metric of avoiding collisions. did not say it right. working on that. I figured it out last night but kind of lost the thoughts here. Its about momentum of all objects. Our solar system is mostly a neat way for a lot of stuff to avoid colliding ,think of it that way. we blame gravity for most of this avoidance there in is a metric system?
Monday, June 6, 2016
Converting Rocket Thrust to angular momentum via a fly wheel and vice versa. invisible force verses invisible force?
No doubt about it. heavy flywheels rotating in a vacuum can probably be used to brake a rocket or accelterate it . How to convert invisible momentum to rotation? we can take trust and instead of forcing the rocket foreward use it to spin the wheel . There has to be eqivalence somewhere or somehow. So lets say we can vaporize the spaceship by hitting a solid wall at 30,000 meters per second forward motion, if instead we had that energy moving the fly wheels or flywheels on the craft even if in opposite directions to counteract any gyroscopic forces and the wall is hit at almost no velocity at all it might also vaporize in the exact same manner. If there is equivalence . One phenomenon is completely inivisible to the space travelers onboard the craft. the travelers also possess the energy of their mass moving at 30,000 meters per second also ready in a flash of a collision to completely vaporize. In the same space craft where all that thrust is used instead to turn flywheels at speeds that use the same amount of energy , possibily more than 30,000 meters per second in the circumference that can become visible to the travelers? or maybe not. first they could never reach out and touch it without vaporizing. There could be no imbalance in the machine or it would vaporize. It might even happen that the entire apparatus of the fly wheel becomes invisible as a result of spinning that fast or at least would look like a mirrored surface. The speed of light or photons reflecting off it would be just like a mirror if the surface was reflective because the speed of light is constant. the geometry of the wheel would be the shape of the mirrored surface.
Friday, June 3, 2016
A Bath Tub Full of Water In Space/ Space Ship Rocket Tub.
Talking about Trust . Energy Force and Photon / Electromagnetic coding ..... Imagine a bath tub full of water in space. The water in the tub is not going to want to go far from the tub if you open the drain it won't give you much of any thrust. No gravity for the drain to work . That's not to say you can't power a space ship in space with Water. The problem with burning fuel in a space craft and exhausting the fuel is your space craft loses mass and then momentum. The more mass retained with the more energy of motion driving it forward if it is actually driven forward as a result of thrust, the better. The universe does not come with any metric grid lines as pictured to show how gravity warps space in the theory of relativity. To accelerate forward with trust with water you might subject the water to electrolysis, separating it into hydrogen and oxygen and then using the hydrogen and oxygen for combustion for thrust. There would be no need to trust that out as exhaust however . in the back of the rocket you might have a series of combustion chambers where those reactions could occur with large pistons that would be forced to the rear of the craft with a reaction within an enclosed chamber so no gas escapes and the water produced in combustion can be reused over and over again in combustion reactions. To condense the water and bring the piston back with out counter acting the forward motion thrust created these chambers are just placed a distance from the space craft behind it so they can be allowed to quickly cool and condense after each reaction. Other chambers could use methane from sewage water on the craft after letting bacteria recycle the water. then your space craft will need a surplus of oxygen to begin with for those separate reactions in separate chambers.
The question then is what really causes the motion forward? of course I will suggest its coding because no object moving forward is actually going to be aware it has all the added energy of motion until it collides with something moving or standing still. It is thus dark energy. There is a possibility instead of moving objects forward in space or in any direction at all that instead the force of thrust is translated into the motion of fly wheels that subtract from any forward energy with motion energy that is apparent to observe . If you can take the work energy of thrust and apply that to spinning the giant heavy fly wheels on the space craft then there is equivalence in force to subtract from any force forward. what if you could break the space craft to slow it down quickly with the fly wheels by maybe just inverting them in some gyroscopic manner? Anyway if energy is not apparent as caused by thrust maybe by making it apparent the space craft can slow down or brake? What is happening at the atomic level with atoms moving forward with out any sense of distance without some artificial grid imposed? Thinking out loud here . So behind the chambers for combustion thrust there could be a chamber filled with a noble gas like xenon which cools down to the temperature of space only to be quickly heated with each combustion reaction in the chambers before it. That too can give trust forward. no mass needs to be lost keep all your water and all your oxygen for the duration of your space trips and have your thrust without any type of exhaust everything being recycled. Now with theories like Bose Higgs fields maybe motion forward is just some kind of simulation of that field? I don't really suggest I believe that bose higgs either exists but maybe it can in theory to explain forward motion in a universe with out metric grid demarkations?
I suggest that every atom in a foreward moving system or mass is in some way itself like one of the proposed fly wheels. the energy is somehow contained with in for what happens in a collision.
The question then is what really causes the motion forward? of course I will suggest its coding because no object moving forward is actually going to be aware it has all the added energy of motion until it collides with something moving or standing still. It is thus dark energy. There is a possibility instead of moving objects forward in space or in any direction at all that instead the force of thrust is translated into the motion of fly wheels that subtract from any forward energy with motion energy that is apparent to observe . If you can take the work energy of thrust and apply that to spinning the giant heavy fly wheels on the space craft then there is equivalence in force to subtract from any force forward. what if you could break the space craft to slow it down quickly with the fly wheels by maybe just inverting them in some gyroscopic manner? Anyway if energy is not apparent as caused by thrust maybe by making it apparent the space craft can slow down or brake? What is happening at the atomic level with atoms moving forward with out any sense of distance without some artificial grid imposed? Thinking out loud here . So behind the chambers for combustion thrust there could be a chamber filled with a noble gas like xenon which cools down to the temperature of space only to be quickly heated with each combustion reaction in the chambers before it. That too can give trust forward. no mass needs to be lost keep all your water and all your oxygen for the duration of your space trips and have your thrust without any type of exhaust everything being recycled. Now with theories like Bose Higgs fields maybe motion forward is just some kind of simulation of that field? I don't really suggest I believe that bose higgs either exists but maybe it can in theory to explain forward motion in a universe with out metric grid demarkations?
I suggest that every atom in a foreward moving system or mass is in some way itself like one of the proposed fly wheels. the energy is somehow contained with in for what happens in a collision.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)