Misunderstood probabily of the existence of Life, The earth, The entire comos as it is.

It is too customary for people and even scientists to be in awe that life exists or that the earth exists in its wonderful state of being .  The same people state that the probability of life existing and earth itself being what it is and where it is, having a  moon as it is  and an atmosphere are prone to say that the probability of all of this being so is something like 1 out of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000.  

That is entirely incorrect. The probability of everything being as it is and our having consciousness to think about it all is actually closer to 999,999,999,999,999,999   out of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 .  Having all thing being what they are is actually certainty not like winning the grand prize in a lottery. The odds of other earth like or semi similar earth like planets existing with life is also probably certainty or near certainty .  It's no lottery.  The proof for this is that we live in a coded and coding universe....  we used to call it the laws of nature now it has become the coding of nature. We  have the periodic table that links directly to the electromagnetic spectrum and now we are finding that  everything in the universe may actually be some form of electro magnetism and nothing else. Matter itself being electromagnetism?    Yes though there maybe rather basic particles are something else other than electromagnetism that are coding vehicles.  This reverses the theory of Either where space is full of either that allows the transmission of electromagnetic waves at various frequencies to a theory where the material elements of mater and atoms have their cores as the actual either and any un coded either out in the cosmos  can become coded later or lose it's coding.  Very different theory.

Where the real proof comes in is that if what we call artificial intelligence really is intelligence than the whole universe has intelligence as it is coded.   String theory sort of hints at this but really does not understand what an intelligent universe is.  This is not an analogy for plucking frequencies on taught strings  this is taking the definition of the word intelligent and saying that the behavior of stars and our Sun and planets , galaxies etc are demonstrations of intelligence.  predictable intelligence. predictable interactions.   The coding of  everything and photons having been found to be pure code that neither transmit energy nor have any mass is then key to the theory.  Once basic intelligence of everything is understood then Einstein is right that god does not play dice with the universe .  Though God is pure probability, the probability is certainty and the certainty is set by coding.

Erik Peter Verlinde's Theory of Enthropic Gravity is not quite right.

Entropy is a physics term I refuse to accept as having much of any empirical status.  The reason why is that water falling over a dam and driving a turbine below or just being a waterfall is not a state of entropy.  The water comes back to become a body of water in the river below eventually.  Gravity is not entropic because We don't find crystal formation or other forms of  pattern order occurring without it.  Before we have DNA we have to have gravity.  Gravity is not a state of entropy.   I do however give Verlinde credit for making his observation.  There is a state of mater that could fool a person into thinking it is because of entropy that in integral to how gravity empirically behaves.    Black body radiation will cause spot increased gravity anomalies.  That is because of the interaction of photons.  You have to read my thesis on the nature of photons being pure code to understand this  .going back to the point I say that if you have a car moving at 50 miles per hour that suddenly stops and a bowling ball in the front seat is not seat belted in it will fly straight though the front window.  ''

The ball is actually still moving in the direction that the car had been moving and does not stop.  The frames of reference to a viewer   outside is the ball is flying though the window but inside the car the view of things is different there it would seem that the ball just did not stop with the rest of the car and the rest of its contents.   With photons striking an object  it does not work that way. There the car is moving at 50 miles per our and the ball is in the back seat. Suddenly outside viewers see the ball flying out the back window of the speeding car that has not stopped but inside the car the view can be different. nothing shot the ball out the back of the window but somehow the ball stopped moving with the car because  it did.  maybe it was tethered to cord  that suddenly stopped it and it appeared to fly or maybe something magical called a photon interacted and stopped it such that if flys thought the back window of the car that is still moving at 50 mph.  That's exactly what the coding of interacting photons does . A photon interacting with mater causes explosive subatomic reactions on a tiny probably electron size scale.  The photon does not hit and add energy but actually hits and takes energy of momentum that is underlying in all mater essentially stopping the electron in place which separates it from the rest of the atom that still has the ongoing momentum.  Now that is where I started thinking about the entropic theory of gravity . though it is pretty much backwards from my research. There is nothing entropic about it. except that the underlying momentum of objects is its normalcy verses what would seem to be 'entropy' if seeming to fly off because the photon or a quantity of photon cases these subatomic particles just to stop while the rest of the atom keeps plowing ahead with its normal motion.

So I totally discount that theory of gravity and entropy being linked simply because it is not entropy but rather a frames of reference  mimicking of entropy.