Empirical Probability Theorem , The Undoing of Entropy and the Undoing of the second law of thermodynamics.

Empirical Probability theorem:   Empirical Probability Disproves The Second Law Of Thermodynamics And Also Demonstrates That Entropy Is A Temporary Condition  And Not A Final End Point of System Energy Nor Dispersal.   The proof is actually very simple:  Empirical Probability makes predictability of systems discernible  in advance where as Entropy is unpredictable and wanting. 

One example is a simulating random number generator.  Of course there is nothing random about random numbers generated by a generator because to be truly random they have to pass the test of randomness.  It is uncertain that random numbers actually exist in nature outside of our human capacity to facilitate them?  Simulated probability differs from Empirical probability because Simulated probability is designed to have an element of entropy in involved where as empirical probability as discerned in nature lends itself to vast potential predictability based on conditional probabilities of multiple variables. When this is simulated with artificial probability in a computer or a slot machine the simulation emphasizes a lack of predictability otherwise every player would win the game.

Empirical probability gives us the ability to  make very good predictions on a lot of things before they happen.  If Entropy was where everything was bound to go then our ability to predict probabilities would be impossible.  It requires no complicated proof  except to say we would not be able to predict the weather , the motion of stars and galaxies if entropy was a real phenomenon.

Striking out the second law of thermodynamics or modifying it we also need to add a third or forth law of thermodynamics that gravity is a property of thermodynamics.  That is a different story found on my other sites including Gravity is Hot and The New Laws of Physics by Lex Loeb.

"The second law of thermodynamics states that every energy transfer increases the entropy of the universe due to the loss of usable energy" Is incorrect.

Here is proof:    "*"    DID YOU SEE THAT?   LOOK AGAIN .  It is still there .  It looks just like this: "*"!    What is the point?  It is really basic empirical science.  You are looking at a computer screen of some sort and the original energy I expended to put that mark ("*") is able to be maintained right there where I put it in this paragraph.  So you say "Well the computer was never unplugged from the battery or the wall electric outlet.--It is regenerated constantly."  But that is not at all true. I typed the original "*" just like this one and the concept entered the computer memory even after I erased the page and turned off my computer.  You say well the digital /mechanical memory storage is anything but entropy.  That is correct.  Which is a part of the proof. The storage of this entire blurb is only recognized by computers and viewing devices as I wrote it in this form you are now witnessing because the computer recognizes statistical probability at some atomic or molecular level. Is it bits of binary logic that enables the coding in the storage system? Variables of statistical probability is all that makes this paragraph different than this shorter paragraph: 

"slkdfnl glkf wejklf, glkjsdf. glskdflsd, lkg  ,qickwe, slkdf, gk, slkjklkds" woeir"., soiern. "

Well, you say it just takes more time for the second law of thermodynamics to undo the original order and we all know that digital information storage degrades over time.  Actually it does not so long as it correctly passes from one memory system to the next. The paragraphs above may both be immortal and hence they are a perfect proof that entropy has an impossible task for itself in finding a state where all energy is unusable to maintain a system.  Systems don't degrade into a state of infinite chaos because that is only a temporary phase.  Every odd number is preceded by and followed by an even number .  That is not an accident or a man made contrivance.  Statistical probability requires it,  Ah then there is that number zero (0) but it is not a number or is it?  if zero is between one  and minus one that automatically makes it an even number.  You think I am joking? Numbers are about logic for representing what we do for counting.  The ultimate proof that entropy is nonsense and the second law of thermodynamics is erroneous , is to tell your physics professor that you figured it out zero is an even number.  Yes you will get a failing grade and it will cost you your academic career yet it is absolutely positively correct.  What does that have to do with the first paragraph and the proof that entropy is a complete misconception in physics and thermodynamics?   That is the simple part of the proof.  It is called Poof.   Poof is what a magician does. Poof and there is that "*" all over again . It came out of nothing only because zero is an even number.  The probability that zero is an odd number is zero like the zero itself. 

The probability that every other number in the scheme of numbers is odd or even is absolutely predictable and true if you count to infinity in positive digits or negative digits.  Systems may degrade from what seems more complex orders to what appears to be chaos then just when you think that is the case you see the formation of order  again.  It is not just life that seems to buck the theory of the second law of thermodynamics where: The second law of thermodynamics states that every energy transfer increases the entropy of the universe due to the loss of usable energy.  It is such strange phenomena of stars and galaxies being nearly exactly the same shapes and formations from a few light years away to billions of light years away.  Entropy should not lead you to that conclusion.

I set up a new experiment to prove the thesis.   The idea of the experiment was to see if I could get  a very long string to tie it sell in knots just by moving it in random motions.  And of course it did  but it did not do it every time if you had a limit on the window of time to conduct the experiment.  If there is no window of time, no limit of time, in inevitably will become knotted.  That is when multi-variables enter the picture because there is more than one way to become knotted or if you prefer the word tangled in itself.  There is more than one sequence that ends  up tangled.  You can attempt to make it a trick you perform once you realize the sequence of movements required as a motif.  That leads to the idea of a multi-variable generator or calculator. That is something like a computer that can record every possible game of chess that could ever be played.  There might even be a finite number of possible games that end in a draw or with check mate.  Newton had his objects that stayed at rest or stayed in motion and those are both probabilities of being an object in a universe where there is energy.  That is a binary probability right there.  In motion or at rest or both because of a frame of reference misunderstanding.  If I were to fix Newton's laws by adding a new very basic law of nature I would add one that says something like "randomness tends toward order if any smaller component part has any seed of order to begin with."  I would strike anything to do with entropy and say that there is no such thing as Irony.