I set up a new experiment to prove the thesis.   The idea of the experiment was to see if I could get  a very long string to tie it sell in knots just by moving it in random motions.  And of course it did  but it did not do it every time if you had a limit on the window of time to conduct the experiment.  If there is no window of time, no limit of time, in inevitably will become knotted.  That is when multi-variables enter the picture because there is more than one way to become knotted or if you prefer the word tangled in itself.  There is more than one sequence that ends  up tangled.  You can attempt to make it a trick you perform once you realize the sequence of movements required as a motif.  That leads to the idea of a multi-variable generator or calculator. That is something like a computer that can record every possible game of chess that could ever be played.  There might even be a finite number of possible games that end in a draw or with check mate.  Newton had his objects that stayed at rest or stayed in motion and those are both probabilities of being an object in a universe where there is energy.  That is a binary probability right there.  In motion or at rest or both because of a frame of reference misunderstanding.  If I were to fix Newton's laws by adding a new very basic law of nature I would add one that says something like "randomness tends toward order if any smaller component part has any seed of order to begin with."  I would strike anything to do with entropy and say that there is no such thing as Irony.