This conditional probability thesis blog is about probability itself being a fundamental "dimension" of the universe. Go back to the beginning of the blog to see it there. As it goes we have the top three dimensions. point, line , plane , the fourth dimension that is volume and then we have time which is really the same thing as distance. This comes from Euclidian geometry as I have understood it. Then come other times of dimensions one of which is of course something like or is gravity, space-time as some see it or as I see it dimensional expansion / dimensional contraction. This is where you have a distances defined by mass of something like a sphere where the spokes of the radius can actually contract with rock crushing power as we see first hand here on earth. If the earth had less density because of some ability to have less gravity the diameter of the earth could be many times longer than it presently is. Of course I am not saying any of my assumptions are wrong but I do find in my experiments that photons have no mass at all because they do not retain nor transfer momentum to mass when absorbed. I found that blows up a major assumption that led to one of the theories of relativity. I discount the idea that black holes are going to absorb light because light has mass and cannot escape gravity of the magnitude a black hole is supposed to have. Already black holes get brighter and brighter where they are detected and the theorists who still see them there find an area where there is nothing visible and say "see there is a black hole. Nothing is visible in the middle there." Good for them. The theory is safe.
Gravity according to relativity and the existence of a frames of reference illusion is crushing rock to make planetary spheres and crushed rock being crushed and melted is highly activated meaning it has measurable kinetic energy which tells me that gravity at it's source the center of a sphere like that of earth is not slowing time , as I know time, down but rather speeding it up. That does not mean that Einstein is wrong about everything it simply reverses the intellectual mind experiment saying that mass is not creating gravity but gravity is creating mass and perhaps time/ space time is being created by gravity and not the other way around. Which is more like the Original Newton model where gravity is a force. I found empirical evidence that seems to support this in my new laws of physics dissertation that is still uncorrected sorry to say but online somewhere. The question about time is what time is it from the perspective of the cosmic time keeping mechanism? So far as I am concerned yes the universe could have been created in seven days. Why? Because simple logic. Before the first day there were no days to measure days by and then there was light which implies a big bang or the sun was born but there is no earth going around in a circle yet no orbiting planets yet so days , years are months and millennia are completely undefined. A day can be billions or trillions of years as we know it. That way in 7 days as reported in that ancient story, it is entirely possible and likely that it only took seven measured days for creation . The bible does not say the days are units we know as days because the story clearly says nothing had been created yet least of all clocks.
So I see a planet like the earth and a star like the sun as probability generators. We like to think of clocks as regulated time pieces. For me these massive things in the cosmos are the cosmic clocks we have and they set time in their relationships with each other and with the forces that shape them. I have to wonder if the greater galaxy even has the same time scale or perception of time that we do. It is entirely possible that other beings elsewhere in the cosmos count our years as seconds in their life spans. Why not? why would we assume our time scale is universal when we know a Jupiter year is a lot longer than an earth year and then we look at that planet and see regular wind speeds over ten times the higher range of earth wind speeds on average. That may not seem like some coincidence being a longer year with higher wind velocity but it does say that our sense of dimensions is based on how we experience life where we are.
The thing that gets interesting now is that probability is about the outcomes that time allows to happen. Without time there is no need for probability analysis as there are no changes that can be expected otherwise. Time itself is a probability work sheet. With a clock, a regulated clock, we all bet that the clock will be on time , keep time which it does not do which is why clocks need to be reset from time to time. If time can get stuck in a clock than there is an issue of probability there.
No comments:
Post a Comment