What if symmetry and assymetry are basic atributes of the order in the universe? If being symmetrical leads to disorder and being assymetricality leads to order....

Lex Loeb

22 hours ago

I think the probability as a basic cosmic dimension theory is going to blow apart and blow away nonsense like sting theory and similar cosmology because it completely destroys any need for analogies in the science and the need to study the universe as a large collection of interplaying particles. I really had no idea that where this was going was to an understanding that symmetries in the univer...se are based on probability equations. I stare at all of those Hubble telescope photographs and my eye goes directly to the symmetries every time.

I look at the model of atoms, molecules and sub atomic particles and there again my eye goes to the symmetries and asymmetries too. Cold verses Hot in the universe is an asymmetry. Then I look to see if what seem to be cold regions of the visual universe have more or less symmetry than areas where it is necessarily hotter or at least where there is more radiation and more gravity. I am not seeing the universe as a computer binary data stream or a pixel stream as string theorists and others believe they see in analogy but rather as a topography of statistical multi variable probability. An atom seems to be solid just because electrons spin around it forming a shell in the predominant theory.

It is the probability of where the electrons are likely to be that help us detect which one is which so we can perform chemistry experiments on them. I can then take quantum physics and chart it so that all causation is just probability. I discovered with the radiometer proof that gravity is all about the probability of energy flow earlier but never realized that maybe there is some universal law of probability that regulates all of dimensions and that the states of mater from one state to another , from plasma, to gas , to liquid , to solid to super high density or crystalized or bonded as molecules is all regulated by a basic probability motif. It might be sort of like binary computer behavior except there is no evidence that that leads to the regular symmetries as observed though out the cosmos. I am no believer in Entropy because at all light year zones the same symmetries are apparent whether it be a few light years away or in our solar system or here in the lab on earth or millions to billions of light years away. Same symmetries same probabilities. That means the universe models itself and even extrapolates itself without any human need to comprehend it or model and extrapolate it the way other theories like string theory works. Scientist make predictions in a hypothesis and then set out to see if they predictions are correct or not. The universe already has a visual record of what it extrapolated and predicted then because the same patterns of order exist here and then so very far away. That is a whole different way to look at the cosmos than to seek proof that it is expanding or contracting because of a big bang or dark mater or what ever else that can't ever be proven. I only want to look at what we actually see or seem to see or think we see to and then try to figure out not the meaning or the why but the how the same patterns generate and regenerate over and over again. There are rules and exceptions to the rules. If the patterns seen are rules then other patterns have other rules.

I maybe about to destroy Physics and even some Mathematics as we knew it.

Dimensional probability keeps moving up the ladder of the basic geometric dimensions demoting older dimensions to lower levels of the ladder.  Dimensional probability which is also uncertainty just keeps moving up.  It cannot be the zero dimension nor the first .  Those two dimensions maybe the point and if the line is not second than it is third after dimensional probability.  Dimensional probability is perhaps a better way to express what I mean by multi variable probability which is the certainty/ uncertainty range of possible coincident events.  We don't really know exactly what any distances really are. We impose a metric on time, space and on material properties like surface area or volume.  Then take stars for example.  Stars are not necessarily material physiology nor are they physical phenomena necessarily .  At some time scale and unknown distance regardless of the metric we impose they are events.  Yes enduring events since our ancient ancestors recorded virtually the same naked eye star charts we have today.  Once a star becomes an event then it becomes statistical probability.  It has a distance from the earth that is also undetermined and a function of probability.  Space , in the form of a complete vacuum has absolutely no dimensions (none of its own and certainly none of some volumetric Cartesian plane of metered graph paper in our minds. A vacuum
resides where it does because of the dimensional probability of mater from the sub atomic particles to the atom to those stars and galaxies. Material and energy define empty space and even create it by virtue of opposing forces like like-charges.   I am still not sure If I want to go with a positive and negative vacuum as equal and opposite sides of a siphon  so  I am not going there in this dissertation but want to present that idea because a very dense object is often at the opposite side of a vacuum force.  I can explain it later.

So No dimensional vacuum has no way to measure it.  It only may exist because of the dimensional probability.  What that means is one unit of space is the same unit as the next unit of empty space.  Space can be condensed  as fast as mater is condensed.  If a black hole were real it should be doing one of two things besides concentrating mass and the energy of mass. It should be either be expelling space or consuming it (that is why I am getting the positive negative vacuum semantics)   What space as a vacuum then comes to be is indeterminate/ undetermined.  It means an apparent distance is always one single unit of space the same as every other unit of space .  I presented that argument years ago with the zero divided by one equals one thesis.  (Of course I am crazy) but it's still correct.
Instead of time travel or distance velocity travel though the universe maybe we want to try traveling in the dimension of probability ?  Sounds far fetched until you realize we already that.  Every distance we travel is a state of probability.  We travel to a point in space and time which is an event, like those stars I was talking about. The event might not still be there when we get there on our journey.  It is like little red riding hood traveling to see her grandmother though the deep dark forest only to encounter a wolf who had already eaten her grandmother alive.  If we travel as an event ourselves to an event in the scheme of probability as a basic dimension then well that warped  time space Einstein concocted that has something to do with a massive object with gravity fits in to the theory in a completely odd unexpected way.   There is a belief that at the speed of light for a photon, itself, it basically stands still in time , has no sense or appreciation of time even if it were human.  Dimensional probability could mean that what seems astronomically far away really is not that far away if there really is a hard vacuum somewhere in between.  Remember experimental evidence of the speed of light clocks it most accurately in a vacuum.  That is where light stands still and travels at the same time.  Assuming that rate of speed in meters per second or what ever is correct and we have an undetermined probability as distance where is this all going?  Nowhere  maybe? 

In the study of light interactions or rather electromagnetic 'particle' Interactions we already dealing with the study of probability in how it is likely to react on a regular basis.  Atoms absorbing light are known to gain kinetic energy.  The quantity of energy retained by an atom is determined by a sort of chart of probabilities where several different things can happen and more than one type of electron , some being on the outside and some being deeper inside concentric shells reveal themselves as chance.  There is that Little Red Riding-hood principle.  For that there is a moral not an answer except as a probability chart or table.  Not done yet that's just a clue .  There must be a thermo of dimensional probability that turns distances into coinciding events.  That is sort of thinking of never getting to your destination as a world traveler till you end up back home.  Ending up at home does not mean you haven't suffered the fate of little Red Riding-hood in advance either.

Still working on the problem...

I discovered today that people pray to God because God is a probability generator. One prays for a desired event or sequence of events to happen.

 

Einstein said God does not play dice with the universe ...maybe he does? 

 

Ancients prayed for rain or even sacrificed for it. It did not necessarily cause it to rain but occasionally it actually did.  Have you ever noticed that prayer is often  a request for a sought after outcome of events.?  What I am trying to study is the reason for a uniformity of outcomes in nature.

MUSINGS ABOUT SPACE.   By space we usually mean a hard vacuum devoid of all forms of mater as is often postulated to be the substance of "outer space" .  Space as such is a natural phenomenon guided or defined by rules or if you prefer laws of space.  Here are some of the laws of space:

1. Space is both infinite and finite because it can exist everywhere and in between all perceived objects and yet all objects occupy the same space which makes it finite.

2. Space has no inherent  dimensions, no substance nor definitions . When it is perceived it is perceived as distance between identified points. It may envelop only as an illusion of surrounding an object or contained within a structure .

3. Two objects occupy the same space at any distance from one another.

4. Space does not know the difference between one object or another of any mass or size.  It is not displaced the way water is when an object is placed in water.  Space cannot be used to measure specific gravity nor mass by displacement because it does not have any properties that would displace it.

5. A human  being, the Earth, The Sun and even the largest Galaxy in the cosmos occupy the exact same amount of space as any other object because there is only one unit of empty vacuum space in existence. 

6. From the stand point of a vacuum/ space  A human might as well be as large as the sun, a galaxy or a planet like Jupiter or Mars.  There is no scale of space unless perhaps one is introduced into it.

7.  Space is created by objects such as stars and galaxies.  In our solar system all objects are in orbit and thus in a state of falling or they are achieving escape velocity.  The space within the solar system is necessarily defined by objects falling/ orbiting the Sun not by much of anything else.

Not finished yet sorry.  There are some errors to fix.  What is important is that space as we perceive it is closely linked to objects that control it by having other objects in orbit providing metrics that otherwise don't exist.   Space is real not a fantasy and it has definite observed properties.   If a star like the sun was the size of a pin head and we were actually our normal full size then we would still be in big trouble if we were to touch it. More later. 

Moving conditional probability up the ladder of dimensions to a more basic dimension with an analogy.

Worked on a new model for the atom not to say it is so but to muse about the possibility that photons are captured within the electron orbit shells which actually form something of a statistical probability shield to enable that capture. The speed of the electrons around a nucleus is probably about the same as the speed of light or maybe even faster? probability is set.  it tells you for each type of atom how long a photon and which frequencies of photons can be captured  or reflected and then when re-emitted how much excess energy is retained. since excess energy can be retained in a red shifting  event it is a statistical probability of escape and that is why the speed of the electrons could actually exceed that of light.  There is plenty of space inside an atom for a captured electron to be held prisoner in a sense. bouncing back and forth off the electron orbital walls .  There is however no metric of how far that space is even if you measure it by the speed of light.  Metrics just don't exist in space which is why probability variables keeps moving up my list of dimensions.  dimensions are not hierarchical I am learning but more of a circular set or spherical set of inter-related aspects of any observation.  Forget about the analogies of wave length and frequency and switch it all over to conditional probability and it all makes more sense. Wave lengths are the observed interaction of material interfaces and not the photons themselves.  That makes the spectrum one of conditional variable probability too.  That makes conditional probability a much more important as a basic dimension for reality.

The thesis is still developing! Not ready to publish yet. These are just notes....

String Theory is flawed probably because of a couple of basic errors.  What works at the sub sub atomic level or seems to work at that level may or may not be what make the larger structures work.  It is interesting how so many Galaxies no mater how far away in time and space , in the past if not in the future all have the same similar structures  and not only are they similar but you can count them by types and see them on a bell curve with most of them being more average then the rest of them as outliers. Not only are all know planets and stars likely to have a basically spherical shape  their is an average size that you can plot on a bell curve.    You can calculate velocities of objects in space and yes those numbers plot on separate bell curves so there is an average and outliers.  Distances between object.  Yes a bell curve will explain that with an average.  And then there is this interesting phenomenon here on earth, one that comes to mind, and that is on an island without predators where one species evolves into a variety of different species without the predator one can evolve into a predator where there was none before to establish predation as part of an eco system.  Systems are not as subject to entropy as the text books say it is.   This is why I am pretty sure that conditional variable probability actually is the 5th dimension . First we have  the line , plane and three dimensions of space or as pictured by a cube or a sphere and then we have time and then the next dimension is actually nothing other than conditional multi-variable probability.  The sixth dimension is energy , kinetic motion which may include magnetism because it is dimensional expansion and the sixth dimension is gravity which is supreme dimensional expansion.  It may not be that these are a hierarchy but rather better seen as a ring of variable factors.  All dimensions work the way the first three do in radiating from a central point known as the zero dimension.  It really is not zero it is Zero = one  which was essentially the argument that originated the theory of the big bang. 

Sorry I am not there yet.  Don't know what dimension level to give this phenomenon yet.  It is a basic property of  dimensionality with . The theory is still in the works and I have to get the empirical proof explained yet but soon will have it:  

I may have just solved this but I am not sure which dimension it is. It is obviously not the 4th dimension because that is just the 3 dimensions and time. I think gravity might be the 5th dimension and that puts my new conditional probab...ility theorem as the 6th dimension. What I discovered is after you go from the zero dimensionless point and line and plane and then on to the cube or sphere and on to space time and then gravity which adds acceleration or energy to the mix is the existence of variable or conditional probability or that may come before gravity making it the 5th dimension and gravity the 6th dimension. I am trying to figure out which dimension is already scientifically defined with some absolute convention in the science before I can give conditional probability it's numerical level in the scheme of dimensionality. Conditional probability is that everything that is possible will eventually happen which means you have the 3 dimensions , time and possibly gravity which includes energy in the way it is defined and derives mass as a result. It requires mass which probably means gravity at some point to allow the maximum number of particle to particle and particle to energy interactions so I am leaning toward the 6th dimension but not sure it is accurate yet. What does conditional probability do for the dimensionality of reality and everything as we know it or think we do? It simply allows phenomena to do the opposite of what entropy is supposed to do. It explains why we can expect statistical probability to work and why things happen in ways where we see patterns like the bell curve occurring over and over again . It also explains the conditional probabilities of sub atomic particles acting the way quantum mechanics speculates that they do. It is not the DNA of the universe but is more basic than that in that it allows the impossible to happen over and over again. It explains that Darwin's concept of evolution is not as much about the survival of the fittest as much as it is just a force or law of nature that works for planets and galaxies as much as it does for life forms. Things don't have to happen for any reason but just to happen because they can with enough trials or events or variables interacting which for some reason they do and they do so in all corners of the universe. I have yet to reveal the proof where I came up with this odd concept which is a little bit of murphy's law where everything that can go wrong eventually will but is also a sense that there is something like fate or a miracle maker that really is the product of conditional probability as an underlying dimensionality of the universe. Sounds like a stupid concept to you. Well maybe it is or maybe not and then I set up one experiment and observed it. That is when I realized it is a dimension that comes after time and before or after energy with which I lump gravity. Is should bet the 5th or 6th dimension of everything , even consciousness, in reality. Can you harness probability to observe it the way we make a clock to observe the passing of time with a metric? Yes . 5th , 6th? 7th? anyone know?