I maybe about to destroy Physics and even some Mathematics as we knew it.

Dimensional probability keeps moving up the ladder of the basic geometric dimensions demoting older dimensions to lower levels of the ladder.  Dimensional probability which is also uncertainty just keeps moving up.  It cannot be the zero dimension nor the first .  Those two dimensions maybe the point and if the line is not second than it is third after dimensional probability.  Dimensional probability is perhaps a better way to express what I mean by multi variable probability which is the certainty/ uncertainty range of possible coincident events.  We don't really know exactly what any distances really are. We impose a metric on time, space and on material properties like surface area or volume.  Then take stars for example.  Stars are not necessarily material physiology nor are they physical phenomena necessarily .  At some time scale and unknown distance regardless of the metric we impose they are events.  Yes enduring events since our ancient ancestors recorded virtually the same naked eye star charts we have today.  Once a star becomes an event then it becomes statistical probability.  It has a distance from the earth that is also undetermined and a function of probability.  Space , in the form of a complete vacuum has absolutely no dimensions (none of its own and certainly none of some volumetric Cartesian plane of metered graph paper in our minds. A vacuum
resides where it does because of the dimensional probability of mater from the sub atomic particles to the atom to those stars and galaxies. Material and energy define empty space and even create it by virtue of opposing forces like like-charges.   I am still not sure If I want to go with a positive and negative vacuum as equal and opposite sides of a siphon  so  I am not going there in this dissertation but want to present that idea because a very dense object is often at the opposite side of a vacuum force.  I can explain it later.

So No dimensional vacuum has no way to measure it.  It only may exist because of the dimensional probability.  What that means is one unit of space is the same unit as the next unit of empty space.  Space can be condensed  as fast as mater is condensed.  If a black hole were real it should be doing one of two things besides concentrating mass and the energy of mass. It should be either be expelling space or consuming it (that is why I am getting the positive negative vacuum semantics)   What space as a vacuum then comes to be is indeterminate/ undetermined.  It means an apparent distance is always one single unit of space the same as every other unit of space .  I presented that argument years ago with the zero divided by one equals one thesis.  (Of course I am crazy) but it's still correct.
Instead of time travel or distance velocity travel though the universe maybe we want to try traveling in the dimension of probability ?  Sounds far fetched until you realize we already that.  Every distance we travel is a state of probability.  We travel to a point in space and time which is an event, like those stars I was talking about. The event might not still be there when we get there on our journey.  It is like little red riding hood traveling to see her grandmother though the deep dark forest only to encounter a wolf who had already eaten her grandmother alive.  If we travel as an event ourselves to an event in the scheme of probability as a basic dimension then well that warped  time space Einstein concocted that has something to do with a massive object with gravity fits in to the theory in a completely odd unexpected way.   There is a belief that at the speed of light for a photon, itself, it basically stands still in time , has no sense or appreciation of time even if it were human.  Dimensional probability could mean that what seems astronomically far away really is not that far away if there really is a hard vacuum somewhere in between.  Remember experimental evidence of the speed of light clocks it most accurately in a vacuum.  That is where light stands still and travels at the same time.  Assuming that rate of speed in meters per second or what ever is correct and we have an undetermined probability as distance where is this all going?  Nowhere  maybe? 

In the study of light interactions or rather electromagnetic 'particle' Interactions we already dealing with the study of probability in how it is likely to react on a regular basis.  Atoms absorbing light are known to gain kinetic energy.  The quantity of energy retained by an atom is determined by a sort of chart of probabilities where several different things can happen and more than one type of electron , some being on the outside and some being deeper inside concentric shells reveal themselves as chance.  There is that Little Red Riding-hood principle.  For that there is a moral not an answer except as a probability chart or table.  Not done yet that's just a clue .  There must be a thermo of dimensional probability that turns distances into coinciding events.  That is sort of thinking of never getting to your destination as a world traveler till you end up back home.  Ending up at home does not mean you haven't suffered the fate of little Red Riding-hood in advance either.