Tastes like the Grape code.

Here is new physics for you:  When I pop a grape in my mouth I am putting a mixture of mass and energy in my mouth which is also a mixture of mass an energy effectively sending a mass- energy code to a mass-energy code.  The whole thing about time is that it is just codes interacting and revealing probability outcomes.  Once you realize the electro magnetic spectrum is energy imprinted with material coding that only reacts with a spectrum of mater and not the spectrum of energy , it totally changes your perception.  Forget string theory.  This does the trick best and solves the problem of that alive-dead cat being in the NAZI box.  If the cat is alive it is one code of energy in the box and if dead a separate code.  The box having components on the material mater spectrum may darn well know the status of the cat.  I have a machine that detects photons within the visible light spectrum .  Detection means the photons are properly coded to be detected yet it cannot detect spectrum outside of the visible range on the spectrum.  It cannot pick up radio broadcasts nor xrays.  Those are coded for detection by other types of mater in various configurations.  so popping that grape in my mouth is multilayers of code detection.  Mater does not detect mater it detects the energy coding of mater which is like and related to imprinted codes on electromagnetic spectrum.  Am I saying the entire universe is some giant tv screen being broadcast by god for our enjoyment.  Not at all.  I am saying all the interactions are guided by probability however and that the notion that coding starts at the level of DNA is incorrect.  The DNA of Mass and Energy is set between at least two interacting codes one for the imprinted energy code of photons in the EM spectrum and the other is the code of probability for mater to behave across the periodic table as it's spectrum given the energy level differentiation of states of mater from plasma to Solids and as time keepers.


The periodic table is more or less the basis for the mater code spectrum.  The Electro magnetic spectrum is the code for imprinted photons. Between the two the codes can be read and disseminated by radiation or with a laser in a more coherent fashion.

Inevitable probability

Say the odds of winning the power ball lottery are about 1 in 250 million.  Not too easy to pick 6 separate number to win the grand prize the way the game is played.  One can play the same 6 numbers including a separate number for the powerball  each game twice a week and never even get close to winning the jackpot in several life times.   How ever if you played the exact same number chosen or chose them at random before each drawing 1000 times a second for successive game events 1000 times per second you will be certain to win probably multiple times in a life time or a much shorter period of time in days, week, months or years.  Looking at a cosmological reality that is perhaps over 14 billion light years in diameter there is plenty of room  and time for just about anything possible to happen multiple times which is why seeing so many millions of nearly identical galaxies as far as the eye can see should be no surprise.  Probability of life elsewhere and different forms of life.  Inevitable.  That is not the point of the physics of probability as much as understanding how light behaves.  How it imprints it self within the spectrum and then radiates out into space until it eventually collides with mater either to be detected by being absorbed , reflected or ignored.  We see blue when all the rest of the visible light color components absorbed when blue is the only one ignored and or absorbed instantaneously and re-reflected or in passing though.  Only certain kinds of mater allow it to happen under certain conditions.  It is all about probability with the possibility existing in advance that mater will even be in the path way of light that travels as pure 'linear momentum" in straight lines.  This is how probability directs just about everything.  Energy and mass have to come together or find some way to do so with some lens to focus them together.

Vacuumolgy

Big problem with Einstein's notion that space-time alters space so as to warp it is that space has no defining characteristics without mater within it.  There is no Cartesian plain to warp around an object possessing gravity .  Space has no markers.  Einstein resorts to marking space with the speed of light as a constant.  Unfortunately light does not demarcate  points in space until it collides with mater or is intercepted by mater and to be that and sensed as a point does not mean that it is not just absorbed and disappears.  Vacuumology  starts with a rather simple notion that mathematic definitions do not reflect empirical reality but that it can be changed so that 1 divided by 0 is equal to 1.  That is because one physical object with set proportions or proportions that are variable , waxing or waning, reside in exactly as much space as their volumetric proportions .  That hints at mass being a combination of mater and space as is naturally the reality.  An object occupies no more space than it's own proportions hence 1 divided by zero is 1.  does that mean that 2 divided by zero is 2?  No but it is again one because two objects retain as much space between them as 2 objects which is 2 divided by 2 or 1 again.  And so on.  What about the vast areas of space between objects?    Well those areas have the strange potential of having that faint force of gravity acting at astronomical distances meaning that perhaps the way we see proportions in space is wrong because if an object like the sun can influence space beyond it millions of times the diameter of the sun it self  than it's dimensions are considerably larger than we have been imagining them to be.  What is the cut off point where the solar wind is no longer part of the sun?  When does the corona become something out in space?  Vacuumology addresses the problem and it is pretty simple to correct with 1 divided by 0. 

  See more here:

http://vacuumology.blogspot.com/

I am about to stand quantum mechanics on it's head with this discovery. We have an electro magentic spectrum but we forget we also have a material reality spectrum too to detect the em spectrum.

I discovered that every thing that differentiates the parts of the spectrum is degrees and rates of rotation in angular momentum. no longer does energy have to be a particle and / or a wave or have any of that analogy baggage. It completely destroys string theory except for the spectrum that predates string theory. It finally explains how a prism breaks up white light into the colored component parts and it introduces time to the distances traveled thought the prism to pass though with variable rates of angular momentum. Ah but the confusion is where the angular momentum resides. Not in the photon pulses but rather in the mater which leaves it imprinted. Which leads to the new law of physics: The new law of sympathetic resonance of mater. Which means something at a great distance cans send an energy pulse that only will resonate with certain materials that are like the ones from where the pulse was originally sourced and generated. Which is like a mirror that is radiated everywhere from the source. May be you don't get it. Don't worry it is so simple no one has to be a genius to see it is amazing. It means you are alive because you have energy from something else equally alive elsewhere....or if energy if you don't like the analogy

what we see is what we detect because we can detect it or otherwise just absorb it.  when we detect it we take energy that is imprinted and relay it much the way our television screens take a coded signal and relays it accurately as broadcast or sent via a cable or other signal.  this is not to say the universe is a giant tv screen  but it is to say our eyes do not perceive the whole spectrum  nor do other material objects .  imprinted photons relay the angular momentum from which they are generated in what is otherwise just pure linear momentum though not at all detectable without the right detecting materials that resonate under the right conditions.  It was Kepler , I think, who talked about the harmony of the heavily bodies.  he was right about resonance in this sense.  I was correct about the Young double slit experiment being a fallacy.  And this will help correct it.  Light does not interact with light to give an interference pattern but it can interact with the material interface / screen atoms to behave to cancel out angular momentum.  There is more to the theory but the empirical experiments will prove I am correct , they already do.  We don't detect xrays with our retinas and xrays can collide with physical materials that cause them to resonate so as  to generate an electric charge from which we are able to say they are detected and even counted as individual photons.  What it also shows is that an xray can move though the universe with the power of an xray collide with mater and be absorbed and re-reflected as an xray which means the imprint can reimprint xrays.  This is then true across the entire spectrum and probably includes gamma.  It means the larger massive bodies like planets can absorb gamma rays and then later reproduce them even millions of years later so long as the imprint of angular momentum can be preserved or generates higher independent levels .  It can mean that there are spectral range collectors in the universe and closer to home too.

Dimensional Reality : Rules Of The Game.

Move over Euclidian geometry.  Lexian geometry is here to take your place.  Of course it is named after me , though of course I neither discovered nor invented it.  Aliens fed me this information from the distant future though the miracle of a television wormhole.  And Isaac Newton completely confirmed the authenticity of the proof.   Here are the Dimensional Reality Rules of the Game:


1.  There really is no order of the basic dimensions of the cosmos.  All dimensions are in constant "interaction " or our mental relationships as they apply to the practical interpretation of reality.  If there is a first dimension it is a point, a singular point and no other points.  That is pretty clear.  A singular stand alone points exists with absolutely no other points of reference.  It stand alone in a completely compact all inclusive point size container of nothingness. There are no other metrics.  The size of a single point is infinitely small and if there was actually ever a point where the entire universe is fantasized as having been a single point before the fanciful big bang it would have been as infinitesimally tiny as that single point having no other dimensions but a point.  Blame this on Euclid not on Lex.


2.  The next dimensional geometric reality is the appearance of a second point.  It can be one of those unpredictable quantum points that comes and goes popping in and out of reality for all I care.  When the second point shows up it is as infinitesimally tiny as the first point.  Between the two points at any distance can be a line  and many other points can occur along the line such that there is a metric means of proportioning distance or distances between points along the line.  The line has no metric off the line and it does not exist in space it can simply be the same singular point we started with in space and time but it not certain that either space or time would in anyway exist with just a line any more than it would with a singular point.  The line would have no outside ability without a third point outside of it to have any sense of direction to give it that perspective any more than the single point would have.  Direction or sense of direction at least on a plane would take at least three points and that is triangular by definition.


3.  When a third point appears and it is off the straight line between the first two point the dimensional reality of the plane becomes apparent.  It allows for a Cartesian metric to be invented that can stretch vast distances but only on what really is a triangular area between point.  Directionality again would only exist within the triangle and not outside of it without a fourth point off the plane to make it 3 dimensional.... but wait this is the third dimension in a sense the fourth dimension that is usually thought to be time then flips out to the fifth or beyond.


4. The fourth point creates 3 dimensional metric dynamics.  Not usually considered the forth dimension it may be exactly that how ever four points must be off a single line and be aligned  on at least 2 separate lines that are not parallel  to form 3 dimensional reality.  If we have four separate points on two parallel  lines we might remain a plane and need  a fifth point until we have properly identified a point off of a plane.


4.  Moving a point off the surface of a plane in all directions introduces us to the Lexian Probability  dimensional reality  .  That is because the point can be located any distance from the plane to alter relationships of the geometry.


5.  Time then becomes an integral dimension because plane rotation verses the point or points off the plane because probability requires time for what we usually can an event (in probability) to occur.


These dimensions then present a matrix of probabilities that we can predict or try to.  Going back though the list from 1 to 5 it becomes immediately clear that points and lines are completely imaginary philosophical ideas that are not observed in reality unless maybe some quantum particles as observed act like points but that is not clear from any evidence.  It might work somewhat by analogy.


If there is a 6th dimension according to these rules having the interacting relationships of points, lines, planes, time and probability the only dimension left is our conscious ability to understand this. Which is defined by the word perception or conscious perception because animals may perceive what we do but their dimensionality is all about instinctive behaviors.


Next all we need is proof that probability is a basic dimension of cosmic reality.  We find that with a controlled experiment.  We have more than one hour glass / sand clock.  One we turn over to put all the sand on top and let the san flow into a slump pile though the  glass oculus.   The second one we don't turn over but we just shake it vigorously and we get no slump pile as we do in the normal  turned upside down hour glass.  The slump pile appears every time we turn it over in the presence of gravity here on earth.  up in space in zero gravity and the sand grains have no need to fall and may float around like bubbles in a carbonated cola drink, semi suspended in the drink


Whops I was just falling asleep writing this dribble and Isaac Newton pops out of the worm hole on an alien anti-dimensional platform to correct it.  I am not sure I completely understand it but I can tell you what he says:


"You have made many mistakes. First of all any point can be in motion or in a state of rest even if it has no substance and exists only in your imagination.  Until you add energy as a dimension there is no way to prod a point into motion .   Energy of course is another basic dimensional variability.    A single point can have all the energy and even all the mass you can imagine , not exist and have no external dimensions without some metric even if you fantasize you are the observer.  Two points can make a line  and it can spin about a central arbitrary point on the line as rotation and become a circle or a sphere.  Energy , Time, probability are all variables in forming dimensions. Two points , void of mass and nothing but imaginary proximity to each other can also be found to rotate around each other if both have energy which can impart it self as a charge.  Together rotating around each other simultaneously is as good as elliptical. Three points with energy and resulting motion can rotate around the other two simultaneously with each of the other two doing the same and the name for that is a tripoly-eclipse. (something some day you will understand makes water a special molecule)  Essentially the dimensions are Newtonian not Euclidian.  Where energy translates to mass, form, charge, even gravity, acceleration and a large variable number of 'forces' that impact points , lines , planes and figures."  Probability is then a very key dimension.  :Probability requires time and energy as variables to play out it's 'event horizon.'  Dimensions of reality are then probability , time, energy , your geometric possibilities and all of these together can define mass and gravity as probabilities calculated from observed relationships.  If points are actually particles  these can be vested with energy and then acceleration , force mass and even underlying gravity.  Euclidian geometry fails because planes are spherical and lines can become so too it rotated at a central point.  The Euclidian model is also probability driven but in nature we observe spherical nature and elliptical nature not square and not often triangular.

Geometry of Nature Verses Human perceptions of natural symmetry.

The idea that probability is a basic dimension in reality and not something we just perceive artificially brings up questions about  what we think we know is probable.  In nature elements and molecules are prone to crystalize.  They assume distinctive predictable shapes as crystals grow where and when they do.  We have tables that show the expected shapes and  it may or may not be the case the crystals form in the same shapes in different environments say with less gravity on a smaller planet or much more in a much larger planet.  Some of that can be tested in the lab increasing pressure and temperature to mimic higher gravity. So we have a pretty good idea about what shapes are likely to be assumed by crystals of various combinations of elements and molecules.  What we cannot as easily predict is how crystals will grow independently and in formations of multiple crystals. The variables are so many that we have collections of rock mineral crystals  of many different diverse variations.  Man made crystals tend to have similar and completely different fofms that are not found in nature including various diamond cuts for raw diamonds.  crystals are not all symmetrical when we find them in nature but they do have some modulus of symmetry we can assume is a form of symmetry.  It is like looking at all the visible structures in the universe as seen by our various telescopes.  We see the same sorts of structures near and far.  Most famous are spiral galaxies we see as close as 1-2 million light years away and as far away as 10 billion light years away.  We accept what we see with our high power telescopes as being straight forward what we think we know as opposed to something other than what we think we know.  At the same time we are willing to accept ideas that time is not absolute and that time space may just be showing us an illusion.  It seems entirely possible that we see in any moment time warped structures that are actually stable except they are beyond

Why not use the super collider at CERN to prove that probabiliy is one of the most basic dimensions of the cosmos?

What I find most interesting about super collider experiments is the ability to predict the types of outcomes expected.  The hole idea is to have some standardized means of detection that actually may preclude having any unexpected detectable events.   It seems strange that with an array of macro level detectors that sub-sub-sub particles are going to be detected and not just pass though , between or beyond detection?  To the extent that the results are predictable might really be more important than exactly what might be deduced as happening.  The actual results are in a sort of black box from which a lot of inferences are required to try to understand what ever happens inside that box.  Predictability is a sure sign that probability is acting as a sequencer of events.  Meanwhile I am wondering why we don't grow crystals guided by some computer medium.  I am thinking of a 3-D equivalent of a flat screen tv matrix.  Crystals develop their characteristic geometric faces because they are in a medium for growth and not outside of some medium.  It is important when looking at a quartz crystal to realize it did not assume it's characteristics out in some vacuum.  Those perfect looking geometric facets of crystals form at an interface with the medium.  I was looking for probabilities when it comes to quartz crystal growth because those crystals tend to grow in  the company of many others exactly like the rest with plenty of variation deviations. I still can not find any mathematic formula to generate crystals as a computer simulation.