Vacuumolgy

Big problem with Einstein's notion that space-time alters space so as to warp it is that space has no defining characteristics without mater within it.  There is no Cartesian plain to warp around an object possessing gravity .  Space has no markers.  Einstein resorts to marking space with the speed of light as a constant.  Unfortunately light does not demarcate  points in space until it collides with mater or is intercepted by mater and to be that and sensed as a point does not mean that it is not just absorbed and disappears.  Vacuumology  starts with a rather simple notion that mathematic definitions do not reflect empirical reality but that it can be changed so that 1 divided by 0 is equal to 1.  That is because one physical object with set proportions or proportions that are variable , waxing or waning, reside in exactly as much space as their volumetric proportions .  That hints at mass being a combination of mater and space as is naturally the reality.  An object occupies no more space than it's own proportions hence 1 divided by zero is 1.  does that mean that 2 divided by zero is 2?  No but it is again one because two objects retain as much space between them as 2 objects which is 2 divided by 2 or 1 again.  And so on.  What about the vast areas of space between objects?    Well those areas have the strange potential of having that faint force of gravity acting at astronomical distances meaning that perhaps the way we see proportions in space is wrong because if an object like the sun can influence space beyond it millions of times the diameter of the sun it self  than it's dimensions are considerably larger than we have been imagining them to be.  What is the cut off point where the solar wind is no longer part of the sun?  When does the corona become something out in space?  Vacuumology addresses the problem and it is pretty simple to correct with 1 divided by 0. 

  See more here:

http://vacuumology.blogspot.com/