We checked. Water above the dam is the same as water below the dam.

So what is the difference between water above and below a dam.  water above the dam has energy in it to  power the turbines below the dam but water below does not have the same potential energy . so we checked to be sure. we bottled water below the dam and brought it up to the top of the dam and it was the same as water on top of the dam and we took water from the top of the dam and it was identical to water at the bottom of the dam.  No difference .  The water was exactly the same.  So how is it that water has potential energy on top of the dam and where is the energy stored that will power the turbines?    That is a proof that suggests the idea that energy is just expression of a code transmitted when a photon is involved in adding work of energy to a material system. It really suggests that the coding added to the water is just it's higher elevation above the turbines at the dam verses the spent water below the dam.  The water was energized to become humidity that rained down the landscape above the dam because of solar energy out in the ocean.  It only lifted it to a higher elevation giving it potential energy otherwise completely identical to water below the dam at a lower elevation.  That says mater can have added potential energy without having to express it and that a photon can bring it a code that energizes it. strictly as a code and not a transmission of actual energy. It means that the energy may already be stored completely in mater and as seems likely now, photons do  not impart energy at all but just a code that activates mater with it's inherent already existing energy.  Newton says an object in motion will stay in motion or at rest will remain at rest as a law of nature as inertia.  That apparently may not be correct for atoms and sub atomic particles which can become more and less active even go to sleep before angular momentum code is transmitted to them from afar. crazy theory except that the radiometer proof from my original new laws of physics completely supports that notion.  Light hits the radiometer and does not impart momentum as I discovered because photons do not have mass but photons do activate the surface of mater the longer they are absorbed and held by mater. Sure mater reacts with mater to release and /or to capture and retain energy but that is not how photons behave.  photons can cause your skin to burn sunbathing and looking at the sun can burn out your eyes very quickly and permanently make you blind. That still does not say that the energy comes from space on the backs of the photons delivering it.  Instead it seems code that unlocks energy already in the material interface of mater is how it really works.  Our concept of energy may need to be changed when it comes to photons and subatomic particles reacting.  The analogy of water above and below the dam say it all.  The only thing that makes water different is the elevation being over the turbines such that it can fall though them causing them to spin.  Water going though the turbines might warm up slightly as a result from there being some friction involved. Water loses no energy.  it can repeat the exact same thing at a lower dam on the same river where it falls once again causing a turbine to spin generating electricity.  The angular momentum relayed to electrons from the generator to create the electric current is strictly coding expressing itself at the electron level maybe and the energy released is just inherently already in the electrons as it is in photons.