Take the basic carbon quiz to find out how to save the world from climate change/ global warming theology.

Take the Atmospheric Carbon Quiz? See How Smart You Are. So You Say You Believe In Global Warming ? OK Lets See What You Really know.

Take the Atmospheric Carbon Quiz? See How Smart You Are You Say You Believe in Global Warming ? OK, Take the Quiz and Find Out What You Really Know About Carbon Dioxide in the Earth's Atmosphere. Get All Questions Right and Win a Noble Peace Prize Lex Loeb Contributor Network . This is exercises is not about global warming or climate change. It is about basic scientific facts about earth's atmosphere. The quiz is really simple and multiple choice. Just pick the best choice per question and then go to the end of the article to see the correct answers. You must get all of the answers right to win a Nobel peace prize otherwise you fail the quiz. If you fail the quiz then you might want to brush up on your science studies. These questions are multiple choice. Pick the answer to each question that is closest to the scientific fact or to estimated and abbreviated numbers: . . . . . . . . . . . . The Atmospheric Carbon Quiz: Question 1: Most of the volume of air is made of what? (A) Carbon Dioxide. (B) Oxygen. (C) Pollution. (D) Empty Space. Question 2: How much gas is in earth's air around sea level compared to an equal volume of liquid water? (A) 5 percent (B) Half (C) 1/800th (D) none Question 3: Approximately how much does a cubic foot of air weigh at sea level on earth? (A) 1/2 pound (B) 0.10 pounds (C) One ATM (D) 0.075 pounds Question 4: Which weighs more? Hot air or Cold air? A. Cold Air B. Hot Air C. Both weigh the same amount. 5. What is the most prevalent gas in the atmosphere? (A) Oxygen. (B) Carbon Monoxide (C) Carbon Dioxide (D) Nitrogen (E) Xenon (F) Methane 6. What percentage of The Earth's atmosphere in parts per million per dry volume is Carbon dioxide? (A) 20.95 % (B) 78.08 % (C) 4.0 % (D) 0.00005 % (E) 0.0387% 7. What percentage of the earth's atmosphere ,in parts per million, is 10,000 parts per million of Carbon Dioxide (enough to start being toxic to people an animals)? (A) 50% (B) 1% (C) 0.05% (D) 10% (E) 37.7% 8. Which Gas constituent atom has the greatest relative atomic mass? (A) Carbon. (B) Nitrogen. (C) Oxygen. 9. Does Carbon Dioxide in earth's atmosphere React in normal earth conditions with other gases or water vapor in the atmosphere or act as a catalyst? (A) yes. (B) no it is generally very stable as a gas molecule. 10. At the present levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and all other carbon gases put together which best describes the concentration in parts per 10,000 per volume? (A) 1 in ten thousand parts (B) more than 279 in ten thousand parts (C) 12 in ten thousand parts (D) less than 4 in ten thousand parts 11. If the amount of Carbon doubles in the atmosphere in the next 50 years because of out of control industrial growth what would be the maximum amount of carbon in the atmosphere in parts per million per volume? (A)10,000 parts per million per volume (B)90,000 parts per million per volume (C)776 parts per million per volume (D)3000 parts per million per volume. 13. Are there renegade scientists who believe that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is getting dangerously low to support the earth's photosynthetic plant life on land because prehistoric times had much much larger amounts of atmospheric and dissolved carbon in the oceans? (A) Yes (B) No 14. Is it possible for gases to escape from frozen ice or to enter frozen ice the way old mildew tasting ice from your home refrigerator freezer tastes when left in the freezer too long? (A) Yes (B) No 15. Is it possible for a gas to suck up heat from the atmosphere and discharge the heat into the cold night air or up at higher elevations into outer space sort of the way an air conditioner cooler works by retaining the heat long enough to transfer it away from hotter areas? Is methane a heat sink gas that can be used in cooling systems? (A) Yes (B) No 16. What happens when a gas is heated? (A) It rises (B) It gains kinetic energy and moves at a more rapid speed in the atmosphere. (C) most gases with possible exception of water vapor clouds that have dust seeds tend to take an amorphous diffusion though the atmosphere. (D) All of the above. 17. How does a gas in the atmosphere make objects on the ground and the surface of the ocean hot? (A) They bump into those objects transferring kinetic energy of motion. (B) They radiate infrared and other types of electromagnetic waves into empty space that get absorbed by material objects that retain that heat energy. (C) It really does not mater how much heat is retained by the relatively rarefied gases in the atmosphere because the sun rays hitting the physical surface of earth is many times more efficient as direct exposure. This direct exposure makes surfaces hotter than secondary re-radiation of solar energy from gases in the atmosphere. (D)There is evidence that the earth's surface warms the atmosphere perhaps more efficiently than a relatively diffuse atmosphere can warm the earth's surface. (E) All or any of the above. 18. If it were true that Mars could be made habitable for life from earth by pumping carbon dioxide and other gases into it's diffuse existing atmosphere would that atmosphere need to have more atmospheric pressure than the earth's to be effective especially if Mars does not have sufficient ocean equivalents of surface liquid water? (A) Yes (B) No 19. Which of the following conditions will make an actual greenhouse with flowers growing in side of it cooler? (A) painting the floor of the greenhouse black. (B) Sealing the greenhouse so out door air can't get in. (C)taking the windows out so the open atmosphere and pumping in carbon dioxide to replace the effects of the window panes. (D) increasing the sun's exposure on the greenhouse by having mirrors around it reflect more light in. 20. Scientists say that if you have a methane gas stove in your kitchen and no way to light the gas so it burns you can still cook with it if you expose it to sun light because methane gas can absorb 22-25 times the energy of carbon dioxide exposed to solar energy and retain it longer. (A) True (B) False 21. Polar bears survived the ice age and as a consequence they also survived the greatest melting of ice in the last 30-40 thousand years. (A) True (B) False 22. If a group of scientists predict that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is going to cause temperatures to rise on earth and data is collected that shows their thesis may be wrong, which of these answers should they not be. (A) A bit skeptical of their hypothesis and their conclusions. (B) somewhat skeptical (C) Angry that the data does not conform to their advanced training and logic. (D) Feeling like they may have made a mistake or entered some wrong assumptions in the way they generated the original thesis. 23. The ancient Maya thought that if they sacrificed human being to gods that control the weather and ate parts of their sacrificial victims that they would get more than enough rain needed to grow luxuriant crops needed to maintain large populations. If the Maya were right about the world ending in 2012 then they must have been good at predicting the weather with the magic of human sacrifice rituals? (A) True (B) False 24. In the prehistoric times sea levels on earth have been as much as 300 to 500 ft higher than they are today and 300 to 500 feet lower than they are today? (A) true (B) false _____________________________________________________________________________ Answers: (warning you are the genius tell me if I have a typo or got any wrong )use these answers to cheat with if necessary: 1=D 2=C 3=D 4=A 5=D 6=E 7=B 8=B 9=B 10=D 11=C 12=unlucky 13=A 14=A 15=A 16=D 17=E 18=A 19=D 20=B 21=A 22=C 23=B 24=A . Close

Physicists have been fudging their numbers for years not accounting for the huge amount of energy that is released if say two planets collide .

The people at Cern are concerned with momentum but not  momentum that underlies existence.  The Cern complex is traveling though the universe at very high speed measured in thousands if not hundreds of thousands of meters per second.  It is traveling as fast as Switzerland is and the Alps. If some Asteroid suddenly appears the size of manhattan with a depth of a couple of miles  and strikes the earth at high velocity . It has the force of both the movement of the earth and the asteroid combined..  That can be lethal to at least most of the surface of the earth.  Out in space on both the asteroid and the earth before they collide its just like here on earth. we hardly feel like the planet is moving. We have no sensation that the earth is moving. Same is true on the asteroid.  They don't start to feel each other's influence till close enough that gravity between the two causes some tidal effects that quikly increase as the two get closer into their collision. Then when they come together part of the earth just vaporizes as does most of the asteroid  that just hit it.  The combined effect of the explosion on impact is greater than 1000s of nuclear bombs all going off at once.  So there you have instant dark energy.  That water above the dam that will eventually fall and cause the generator turbines to spin looks just like water below the dam with that energy left out.  potential energy above the dam is real but there is actually no test with out letting it fall to the turbines to detect it.  The water molecules don't behave any different above or below the dam. surface tension is the same, density of the liquid is the same.  in the cosmos the energy of motion gets to be astronomical everything is moving.  Some percentage of everything will eventually collide. Chances are that virtually everything that can be seen in the distant universe because of light is a product of some collision.  That's light energy because if is after a collision.  before the collisions it is dark energy.

Dark Mater is Just cosmic momentum and photons are the code that can instantly put a stop or near stop to that momentum....leads to a new momentum frames of reference relativity. Remember the young double slit experiment is an illusion.

These physicists really don't get it. Can't get it. I am slowly figuring it all out, my latest is to confirm frequency and wavelength dynamics of photons in space by placing detectors everywhere in the space to confirm the existence and all I get is shadows form them. curvature of space because of frame of reference at a distance makes one wonder exactly where the observer is standing to make the observation. being a frame of reference then from a different view point then... there still is no curvature of space or space time. and the photons make straight lines from their own perspective but then who rides a photon to observe them? The clencher is to suddenly realize that everything in space is moving and thus has to have good old fashioned Newtonian / pre Newtonian momentum. Turns out photons actually stop subatomic particles in their spots or slow them down dramatically . The more the photon slows the subatomic "object" and stops it the more forceful is the reaction to the onward moving mass with the existing momentum. That delivers the frequency going to that of a gamma ray that codes for a nearly complete stop. I have not quite figured our the wavelength that derives from that per each photon on the spectrum...not yet getting closer and closer though and soon I will be the only person in this part of the galaxy / universe to know it. What happens is as an electron is slowed or stopped it seems to be activated and flies out the back window as if in a moving car breaking that car window because it suddenly stops or nearly does when the car keeps moving foreward.. I got that part the wavelength has something to do with how the window breaks and angular momentum. It is like a two ball transmission system I invented to simplify gear shifts some years ago ...well maybe? That quiet unseen momentum everything has moving at the speed of the galaxy and the part of the universe where our galaxy is moving is the dark energy that these people are seeking . I figured that out and a whole new relativity . Angular momentum and gravity being Hot has everything to do with gravity ...so we can now link magnetism with the electromagnetic disturbances that give us the waves and frequencies observed in the old science. Its starting to make too much sense. This makes no sense unless you realize that the reason they read that photons become 30 percent heavier than electrons is just because of the momentum as dark energy and photons as code that instantly puts a stop to momentum where it interacts. I figured it out . they probably will never will.
See More

Einstein's Impossible Point of View Frame of Reference.

Ok . I am standing on the shoreline watching a ship go by and I see a rock falling from a mast to the floor of the ship.  I am pretty much standing still verses the ship being on shore.  I  see the rock falling in what is an arc as the ship moves forward. On board the ship my video cam shows the rock falling straight down. Both points of view are true and real.   OK.   But then there is Einstein's thought experiment with the rocket or the elevator and laser light going from one wall to the other perpendicular to the acceleration of the elevator or the rocket ship.  Where am I able to stand still and observe that?  Ok so skipping ahead I guess I go out and look for black holes?  Even so my stationary point of view is impossible except as that mental experiment. I have undone this problem in the past with the simple observation that space has no built in metrics  . Einstein ultimately makes the speed of light as a constant in a vacuum the metric of space and time.    That is especially an impossible metric point of view certainly because light can only be assumed to be  in existence between two objects where as it actually might not be.  That's the box with the cat that is both dead and living at the same time.  I am not saying the speed of light has not bee measured accurately or observed but I am saying that the observation with light gets tricky where you are at a distance observing a flash of light on one wall of a space ship coming from the other.   We can test the theory by repeating an experiment with light multiple times and we know the probability of sending light where we direct it so long as there is a detector a reflector for our distance observation.

Photons "feed" on momentum that an object in motion is not even aware it has. No energy is transmited though space via a photon . It is just code.

If I had magic powers to do this.....A car moving at 65 mph has a bowling ball in the front seat. The car stops suddenly and the bowling ball flies though the windshield because it had no seat belt. No magic required for that one . But what if I want to make the bowling ball in the front seat fly out the back window as the car is moving? That's where I need the special magic. I stop the ball with the momentum it has in the car running forward and not stopping at 65 mph.... If I can stop the bowling ball it will seem to fly out the window and then drop to the ground probably rolling in the same direction slowly as the car because it hit the back window to escape. How do I stop the bowling ball independently of the moving car? Possibly I can do it with a very high powered laser because photons can do this to sub atomic particles. I don't think any physicists out there will agree with me but I am 100 percent correct. Photons actually slow down sub atomic particles they intercept and the degree to which they slow down is based on the frequency and wave properties along the entire EM spectrum. It is an Einstein Relativity killer . That's because photons have no mass and that's because the whole story includes space and time and the frames of reference physics. The thing about subatomic particles including electrons is they have set set charges and set connections which is why this effect results in changes in angular momentum. In terms of time and space it would seem that photons can slow parts mater down just like the bowling ball that is in relationship to the motion of the car carrying it. I might be able to perform a laser experiment with something much more massive than an electron to show it is true. I can already do it with electrons. If I can do it with a bowling ball I could create a source of energy that has nearly infinite availability except that it takes substantial energy to generate enough photons to apply it and you do much more physical work than what you net in photon energy equivalence.

Finally an alien bowling ball explantion for how exactly photons slow down mater as code without mass and without energy in transmission.

You have to read the blog from the beginning and the other Lex Loeb blogs to fully understand the new physics.  I think the last post left something to be desired or several things.  This is how you understand it in a frames of reference, new relativity perspective (it is new because it was a false assumption of the time that photons had mass.  what photons have is the ability to have an analogy in the thought process and an effect as mass but actually have no mass and are only code.)  I keep pushing that because I have the proof for it in empirical findings.   The question then is if that is true how it is that the code works at the subatomic level.  I was saying it changed angular momentum which is of course correct but it still desires more of an explanation.  The source of the energy the code relies on for mater to act upon being exposed to photons has been explained from coming from "dark energy" of momentum of mater.  that is to say mater moving with an entire galaxy say at a speed of say 60,000 meters per second against the background of space of other galaxies,  though I have explained that space has no metrics at all inherit in it,  then that 'dark energy' is the momentum of the objects in the galaxy that don't reveal themselves as having energy till they collide with either a stationary or a different moving toward it to create fireworks on impact. That is the energy tapped by the photons that have neither  mass nor energy in transit through space.  

How does the photon as code interact? If the code magically tells the subatomic particle it interacts with to tap energy than the momentum of that sub atomic particle has to decrease.   That is the same as slowing it down in one sense verses the velocity of everything else in its immediate vicinity as part of a material object.  How so?   The aliens more simply explain it as should be with a frames of reference analogy:  your car is moving at 65 miles per hour. you slam on the brakes and skid a bit and the car comes to a complete stop. you suddenly have no velocity and no momentum.  Ok you have the same car do the same thing and you have a bowling ball in the front seat and you stop suddenly and the bowling ball flies though the front window of the car because you had not put a seat belt around it.  Ok now instead you have some magical coding sent to the bowling ball resting in the front seat of your car moving at 65 mph. The code sent to the bowling ball tells it to have zero momentum.  The bowling ball does what the code says and it slows down to a stop suddenly while the car is still moving at a constant 65 mph .  The  bowling ball in various frames of reference is seen flying out the back window of the car at 65 mph.  An observer in the car see it fly though the window and people on the side walk are in danger seeing it coming out the window but not really flying towards them, 

This explains why gamma rays have a punch like they do at that highest energy level/ side of the spectrum.  It is not mass causing the subatomic destruction then of gamma rays.  Since all electrons have exactly the same charge that's where the angular momentum comes in because the shock of the photon bowling ball magic code change level of angular momentum meaning they just get dragged back to the nucleus  orbits after  this happens .


the code that takes energy out of the bank of momentum objects has can  create projectiles as the rest of the galaxy and mater keeps moving verses what slows down  because of hitting the brakes.

Error in new phsycis of photons ,

I misspoke when I said that photons don't have properties of waves or frequencies.  That is not how I should have said it if I did.  The correction is that they do have properties of waves and of frequencies but only in conjunction with mater and that is highly variable across the periodic table.  Detection of photons is not universal with all material substances.  It is true that photons have no mass and transmit no energy and are merely code. That part is correct.  The code interacts with energy already possessed by intercepting mater that can react to the photons as coded and the coding of course is by frequency and wave metrics .  I only mean to say that in empty space photons have no attributes of waves or of frequencies . I assume they actually travel in straight lines. That could change with more research.

where the energy apparent comes from when photons interact with mater is from the "dark energy" of momentum which is to say that they are code traveling at the speed of light in a vacuum and interact with mater which is always certainly in motion.  everything in the galaxy we live in is moving at some speed verses the rest of stuff out in space away from the galaxy.  The velocity of everything in the galaxy could be 60,000 meters per second. We don't even notice till we crash into some other galaxy moving at some velocity and some parts vaporize on impact  That is the reservoir that photons interact with to release energy.  That same energy of momentum from centrifugal  forces / angular momentum can lead to the high density mater from which we derive nuclear energy too.  That has to be the source of the energy released by photon coding.  It could have a nuclear effect in a super high speed collision which is probably the real source of all super novaea .

I do now have the proof of this origin of photon coding for resourcing dark momentum energy from the black body radiation effect and from the radiometer proof I published years ago.  as photons do not impart momentum they have no mass.  a reflected photon is first absorbed and then re-emitted as the reflection some tiny amount of infrared could be retained in the material mirror interface to radiate out anywhere from that body later. that photon energy is essentially 'red shifted' toward infrared. The speed at which reflection happens is something to be concerned about because it does not necessarily have to be instanteous although all of our mirrors are.  again that is the retention of the infrared code that later comes off . When a visible light spectrum photon is reflected it imparts no force on the reflective surface because the incoming energy  has to equal the outgoing energy minus that attributed to the infrared retained for radiation later.  Now when a black surface absorbs radiation and does not reflect it much more visible light gets converted to kinetic heat energy in the atoms later to radiate out as infrared photons.  There the impact is a net positive with the code and it sends out electrons in the direction form which the photons came. that opens the doors to the statistical probability that electrons from within the mater can fill the void opened  shifting and actually slowing down that dark energy of momentum by some tiny amount . The reflective surface is a wash.  This is not what moves the radiometer vanes in the ones with rarified gas contents but it does show the process and nails down the properties of photons as not having any mass and not transmitting any energy though space.........The hot black electron excited surface has a negative charge to interact with the electrons on the rarrified gases.  pretty simple .  The trick to understanding it is understanding that all photons are going to be absorbed before being re-reflected or they are going to be transmutted into different spectral photons in the process before being re-radiated.  all code it seems is eventually re-radiated.  Then we have what looks like a gallon of gasoline. we believe that originated with solar power via photosynthesis so the fossil fuels energy theory begins. It was coding that got that energy packed in with molecular bonding such that gasoline has an enourmous btu potential..The energy that comes out of it is possibly all eventually to become infrared radiation?  maybe so but it is going to move a lot of stuff around when it quickly oxidizes .  lots of momentum and that does not get counted in the conservation of energy budgeting.  The value of the infrared radiation may not be as high as calculated then to reach total conservation of energy balance.