Ah, the concept of dark photons...close range between atoms and subatomic partlicles...as "bonding energy" well more like bonding communications with syntax....

Yes Dark Photons exist and their coding is bonding energy .  What is remarkable is we cannot actually prove that a photon is bonding energy even if we observe the bond coming apart and the photon hitting our retina that's because when it is bonding energy it really has no energy as it is just as much a code being sent as a photon is code to unlock energy already existent in substance elsewhere.  So I can't prove anything essentially until I show why coding can or cannot bond atoms.  I am looking at incandescent light and flames burning where bonds are breaking with gas flying away so bonding is un-bonding.  not sure I want any proof by inference or deduction because that coding thing is dark when it s bonding.  bonding has syntax and it literal is in code for atoms and subatomic particles?  maybe so .  we don't bond positive and negative sides of magnets without sharing the bonds and not all bonds are going to happen everywhere as each set needs an angular momentum coding to bond....with angular momentum what comes around goes around so the communication with code may be the bond. photons wasted in bonding can send the communications far away to be seen as visible light or other wavelengths by detectors.

still thinking this out but it does make sense.  we know angular momentum creates bonding energy and that photons are just code for levels of that angular momentum...so I probably figured it out already but....still have to relate it to other phenomena.  Not communicated code is not energy .  We have economic markets that bind people and their industries together with mediums of exchange like dollars.  dollars have no energy they are only representational code but they can bind up an huge industrial complex on multiple continents.  So it seems photons as code are more like a medium of exchange coding device....and that actually makes sense because not all subatomic particles or atoms will bind together under all circumstances.  Probability is that the can , will or won't.  It is funny how we humans interact and bind with language and that language has no actual energy or power.  we humans may have bind worthy sexual energy and drives and that may be the real binding energy but still not at a physical level our minds process the sexuality to bind with others and the mental process is the drive but not the physical energy.  Why should atoms be any different?  maybe atoms can actually think before they bind with each other in chemical reactions by following coded angular momentum signals?  Sounds totally crazy but then it sort of makes sense.

Since coding explains a lot I need to find out what happens where the code actually has some real effect and not just a transposition of some minute amount of angular momentum as much as 14 billion light years off in the total diffusion of mass and energy in the distant future thus.  The effect of photons at close range is where the issue would be and there we can not get between the photon and the substance that it interact with without being the detector and we know our eye does not bond to something because the photon interacts with the retina...how ever if the photon travels and stays in the dark as binding energy or just the code for that transposing the sympathy of the angular momentum without any flash of light visible to outsiders then  it solves a problem in understanding coding.