When Boltzmann Entropy Decay and Chaos Fails

 Entropy as defined in basic thermodynamics proceeding Boltzmann thinking on the phenomenon was about Heat exchange  from the hot to the cooled. It was about a system that provided working energy to a system that degraded.  Extrapolated to the entire universe everything comes to an end with no revival possible.    But wait.  The Hubble deep field photographs show an unlimited number of similar looking galaxies and the deep field is almost everywhere and it may have all happened as long ago as 14 billion earth years ago.  The Universe as we study it has recurring forms and these go from a few million light years away to 14 billion light years distance.  Why would the same  or similar structures reoccur so often at so many  different distances ?   How is it that we can catalog the same forms virtually everywhere ?  Then at the microscopic level of atoms we see the same thing.  Concentrations of lithium in certain dry lake beds and concentrations of  calcium carbonate because of life in oceans as limestone and marble and then we also find that ancient humans tended to concentrate all the metal found in bronze and iron and burry them in tombs.  Occasionally humans have concentrated gold hoards and left them buried in tombs. That tells me that entropy is not necessarily the universal result of any system losing energy content.  Yes the ability to continue collecting gold ends when the collector dies but that does not mean that some new entity is not again concentrating it nor does it mean that new dry lake beds full of lithium salts won't happen in the future though i am unsure what causes  a lithium dry lake bed to form.  

Crystals form in hot liquid brines and in melted rock.  What many don't realize is that the crystals can form and reform in different patterns as the melted rock or brine stays liquid and hot/ warm.  So you can have quartz crystals forming and then morphing into new quartz crystals until cooling starts to set them as finished.  Crystals that form are anything but the product of chaos and entropy....nor forms that are disorder  nor chaos.  A crystal forms in a state of relative chaos with thermodynamic input . Crystals may break down later and components of beach sand but even there they maintain the qualities of the original larger crystal structure.  Entropy is thus fine and well to see in some individual systems with thermodynamic input utilization but it can't be extrapolated to everything and everywhere.  Just the idea that a star blowing up and making star dust elements including most in the periodic table is anything but entropy.  Crystals forming in warm brine are the exact opposite of entropy with order becoming geometrically apparent. Add heat and water again and it all dissolves into what some would see as chaos and others see as potential order.  I have long disregarded the idea of Entropy as being universal to all systems and to the cosmos  just because of the existence of DNA. If all states of nature tended toward entropy there is no ability for DNA formation to have ever happened.   The major question I have is why and for what purpose or plan or accident does anything want to reproduce itself and with life why should it have any survival instinct.  Do crystals have survival instincts?  Harder crystals like diamonds and garnets can retain their geometric perfection becasue they are harder than surrounding  materials they grind up against....But I suppose that if you have very hard crystals and set them in the path with less hard materials like an asteroid moving at 900 meters per second or faster that they can put an end to them and their order.  The interesting thing about collisions is they are thermodynamic.  I read Calder's book as a child about the violent universe.  Nothing is safe out there but a collision in space I now believe is the usual reason for a super nova rather than some collapsing star.  Even if  it is a collapsing star and i am wrong ...we can catalog images of super novae and they have characteristics that put them in categories...not a bit of lack of order and chaos to be able to do that...so entropy is fine when it comes to house keeping.  A home without housekeeping will completely collapse and become soil in less than 2 years.

Misunderstood probabily of the existence of Life, The earth, The entire comos as it is.

It is too customary for people and even scientists to be in awe that life exists or that the earth exists in its wonderful state of being .  The same people state that the probability of life existing and earth itself being what it is and where it is, having a  moon as it is  and an atmosphere are prone to say that the probability of all of this being so is something like 1 out of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000.  

That is entirely incorrect. The probability of everything being as it is and our having consciousness to think about it all is actually closer to 999,999,999,999,999,999   out of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 .  Having all thing being what they are is actually certainty not like winning the grand prize in a lottery. The odds of other earth like or semi similar earth like planets existing with life is also probably certainty or near certainty .  It's no lottery.  The proof for this is that we live in a coded and coding universe....  we used to call it the laws of nature now it has become the coding of nature. We  have the periodic table that links directly to the electromagnetic spectrum and now we are finding that  everything in the universe may actually be some form of electro magnetism and nothing else. Matter itself being electromagnetism?    Yes though there maybe rather basic particles are something else other than electromagnetism that are coding vehicles.  This reverses the theory of Either where space is full of either that allows the transmission of electromagnetic waves at various frequencies to a theory where the material elements of mater and atoms have their cores as the actual either and any un coded either out in the cosmos  can become coded later or lose it's coding.  Very different theory.

Where the real proof comes in is that if what we call artificial intelligence really is intelligence than the whole universe has intelligence as it is coded.   String theory sort of hints at this but really does not understand what an intelligent universe is.  This is not an analogy for plucking frequencies on taught strings  this is taking the definition of the word intelligent and saying that the behavior of stars and our Sun and planets , galaxies etc are demonstrations of intelligence.  predictable intelligence. predictable interactions.   The coding of  everything and photons having been found to be pure code that neither transmit energy nor have any mass is then key to the theory.  Once basic intelligence of everything is understood then Einstein is right that god does not play dice with the universe .  Though God is pure probability, the probability is certainty and the certainty is set by coding.

Erik Peter Verlinde's Theory of Enthropic Gravity is not quite right.

Entropy is a physics term I refuse to accept as having much of any empirical status.  The reason why is that water falling over a dam and driving a turbine below or just being a waterfall is not a state of entropy.  The water comes back to become a body of water in the river below eventually.  Gravity is not entropic because We don't find crystal formation or other forms of  pattern order occurring without it.  Before we have DNA we have to have gravity.  Gravity is not a state of entropy.   I do however give Verlinde credit for making his observation.  There is a state of mater that could fool a person into thinking it is because of entropy that in integral to how gravity empirically behaves.    Black body radiation will cause spot increased gravity anomalies.  That is because of the interaction of photons.  You have to read my thesis on the nature of photons being pure code to understand this  .going back to the point I say that if you have a car moving at 50 miles per hour that suddenly stops and a bowling ball in the front seat is not seat belted in it will fly straight though the front window.  ''

The ball is actually still moving in the direction that the car had been moving and does not stop.  The frames of reference to a viewer   outside is the ball is flying though the window but inside the car the view of things is different there it would seem that the ball just did not stop with the rest of the car and the rest of its contents.   With photons striking an object  it does not work that way. There the car is moving at 50 miles per our and the ball is in the back seat. Suddenly outside viewers see the ball flying out the back window of the speeding car that has not stopped but inside the car the view can be different. nothing shot the ball out the back of the window but somehow the ball stopped moving with the car because  it did.  maybe it was tethered to cord  that suddenly stopped it and it appeared to fly or maybe something magical called a photon interacted and stopped it such that if flys thought the back window of the car that is still moving at 50 mph.  That's exactly what the coding of interacting photons does . A photon interacting with mater causes explosive subatomic reactions on a tiny probably electron size scale.  The photon does not hit and add energy but actually hits and takes energy of momentum that is underlying in all mater essentially stopping the electron in place which separates it from the rest of the atom that still has the ongoing momentum.  Now that is where I started thinking about the entropic theory of gravity . though it is pretty much backwards from my research. There is nothing entropic about it. except that the underlying momentum of objects is its normalcy verses what would seem to be 'entropy' if seeming to fly off because the photon or a quantity of photon cases these subatomic particles just to stop while the rest of the atom keeps plowing ahead with its normal motion.

So I totally discount that theory of gravity and entropy being linked simply because it is not entropy but rather a frames of reference  mimicking of entropy.                    

NEW Laws of physics will quickly change everythingAll the wrong assumptions maybe being made by scientists/ astronomers in understanding the universe/ cosmos. The energy assumption is probably wrong to start. the gravity assumption may also be incorrect. We assume what works here works everywhere....and it may. The energy assumption is that we have energy coming to our planet in the form of photons...I now see photons as pure information coding. They code to slow subatomic mater down not to speed it up and that is now 100 percent factual and I have definitive proof. you think about kinetic energy and a photon actually deprives the subatomic particles affected fo that kinetic energy or some of it...and that depends on the several factors which are basically if the subatomic particle is affected or not...which is binary and to what degree according to the spectrum. The spectrum adds a limited number of variables per spot on the periodic table. remaking a view of the total cosmos with these newer restraints on the assumptions will change how astronomical telescope photos and data have to be analyzed. The assumption that gamma rays have to come from more violent actions in distant space maybe all wrong. gamma rays have less power than other photons than expected in different types of material collisions. They are often just ignored but sometimes a gas can just totally neutralize them. a gas.

Both momentum and acceleration are dimensions add probability as yet another dimension.....

in case you are worried about living in only three special dimensions.... you maybe happy to find out there are at least 4 more special dimensions including time.....

There is no g force in space rapid or even hyper warp speed acceleration science fiction movies but in reality its a huge problem. say you get up to the speed of light in a space ship how do you brake it? if you get up to that speed you can step off of your space ship on to a planet going that same speed or beam yourself down maybe even....so you put a thruster in the tip of your spaceship to slow down and that with the speed of light momentum you already have crushes your spaceship like an accordion as if it hit a wall.....so you think that there are only 3 dimensions before you get to time? Heck no. your sustained momentum without acceleration is a dimension/ dimensioning process and add to that acceleration in going faster or braking and you have yet another dimension. It is pretty obvious to me. I am concerned about parts of atoms that get dragged along some more than others. the outermost electron in atoms can act with acceleration just like a person without a seat belt in an automobile. the more locked in the subatomic particles are the less probability of flying off there is with acceleration deceleration. Its all getting towards one of my new laws of physics....it should not be new but than no one else seems to realize these are dimensions. if time is the 4th probability is the 5th . momentum is 6th and 7 is acceleration/ deceleration. I am not sure If I need a revision or not.

Yes Probability Is Faster Than The Speed Of Light.

Think of what is already there. Probability is faster than the speed of light.

Another set of New Laws of physics coming into view. Conditionial probability is key to developing a code. Code can develop itself in nature. Code tends to be self replicating.

Another new set of new laws of physics is coming into view.  Some of these have already been touched on in this blog.  Conditional probability is key. 

Get enough independent variables in one place and  mix them up and they can relate to each other in a myriad of different combinations based on simple probability. That's potential probability.   When independent atoms start finding relationships with other atoms , because they can, a sort of   code automatically starts to develop. That's because not all atoms and not all types of energy in the mix are going to react and some react more forcefully an more permanently than others depending on the energy conditions in the environment.  That's a lot of variables as the number of types of atoms and types of forces and reactions becomes apparent. When something chain like or crystalized or geometric results it maybe independently replicated by other sets of the same or similar atoms/ subatomic particles.  This happens naturally.  Conditions of surrounding energy states and  exposure to radiation and other factors  are more integral factor variables.   As soon as any kind of replicable order starts to appear then you have automatic natural coding manifesting itself.  coding itself, leads to replication coding...that's a new law of physics.  Code is prone to self replicate.  If you ever wondered why animals and plants evolve because they have the desire to survive , flourish and reproduce you might think that there is something magical about that.....but it is not just apparent in living organisms.  the coding starts at the subatomic level or even below that level. the entire universe acts as if it has some kind of innate intelligence. We humans are amazed by animal instincts....we think that is the byproduct of  something rational or accidental....what we are seeing is intelligence of underlying code that goes to the atomic level.....it maybe that electricity has caused humans to discover it and  that electricity has caused humans to put electricity to highly advanced uses and not art or science that did it .

The discovery that we live in a coded universe and quite possibly an intelligent universe thus comes right back around to conditional probability theory as the theory of everything.

Our multilayered coded universe where electromagnetism gives us the period table of elements, electromagnetic spectrum , the  spectrograph of elemental photonic signatures and then higher levels where we have genomes and DNA and then structural coding beyond that of organic molecules that interface with the DNA present us with not only this horrible run on sentence but with an enormous number of variables and then permutations there of.

  In order for probability to exist as a theory or practice we have to have a conditional notion of what possibly can happen in advance. We thus need variables and more variables we have the more we can anticipate some probability in the future. Probability is something that can be recorded as history such as when we do statistical analysis but really we that with a forward time moving ahead outlook.   We think we can better predict the future by analyzing the past ....we might all be gamblers in life but some of use make very big bets with bigger expectations from probability.  It may just be a game at casinos but some people make million dollar bets even though the same thrill of the probability comes from much lower bets.  the valuation of a probable occurrence is a metric and its own layer of variables.  Probability is about expectations and pre guessing what can happen in advance otherwise its just history it happened.

Those who think that time can be reversed will have a problem with probability immediately.  The probability that the past happened is 100 percent though we might not remember it or all of it.

So if there is a God in everything its got to be probability.  In order to have that God in everything we still then need a lot of known variables.  If we don't know a variable and don't have all the layers of code to start with then the probability of a coming unknown event is non existent.  That's not to say we can't anticipate the unanticipated by we can only assign the probability as inevitable but not come to any conclusions about the odds.   That all then comes down to electro magnetism as it manifests itself in mass and energy interplay though out the universe.  If all mass and energy can be reduced to anything of a common denominator it has to be the electro magnetic signatures we detect to determine the existence of everything I listed above as a layer of code for variability.  which includes all the factors in the run on sentence to begin with.  from DNA down to the mass spectrographic ranges.  I resist saying all mass and all energy boil down to electro magnetism only because of the mass defect problems in the original theories.  I can say though that every sense we have synthetic and natural is about electro magnetism disturbances including the spectrum of photons... conditional probability theory then has to rule. https://gravityresearchprogram-grp.blogspot.com/
 

Code and the conditions of probability are a certainty. Everything we know of in the cosmos is coded.

current running down the length of a wire coast to coast is just an electromagnetic disturbance . not one electron that enters the wire from one side makes it to the other side and yet the signal travels near the speed of light when measured. with electrolysis of water the hydrogen bubbles up along the  positive or negative lead in the water only and the oxygen bubbles up the opposite charged pole in the water.  that is the same reaction as electric current in the wire.  both then have to be code passed form electron to electron/ atom to atom along the length of transmission and that code will take apart and rebuild water molecules in the electrolysis water basin on both sides of the polarity simultaneously. that only can be accomplished with that electro magnetic disturbance coding. no hydrogen or oxygen comes out anywhere else from the experiment.  It is damn amazing and point out the most over looked principles of physics I am still working on discovering.  when  you see that experiment which is common place in industry now,  you realize we live in a coded universe.  this principle of electromagnetic disturbance blows a huge hole in quantum mechanics immediately because it is spooky and it atoms and molecules being in different places at the same time and it had been discovered more than 150 years ago.  It also is a black box mystery like the uncertainty principle and Schroder's dead cat but highly certain when we use it in industry.  I can now better explain why so called pons and fliesher cold fusion really may have been real fusion and why the reaction seemed to be on a unregulated time scale.    The real discovery is photons which are then just discarded code or electro magnetic disturbance coding that reveals information but only has real value furthering the transmission of electromagnetic disturbances at close range with the inverse square law taking it to nil at longer distances form the point of radiation source.

Conservation of Momentum. Certain of it now.

I am almost certain that there is no energy to do any kind of mechanical work without momentum and I am talking about the subatomic level to the largest cosmic structures. Some of the first electrical experiments were with fur pelts rubbing glass rods to yield a static electric shock. The largest electronic generators require momentum to allow what is essentially friction that slows down the wheel to yield work energy.  the conservation of energy rule is all about requiring resistance/ interference with a magnetic charge or even the creation of a magnetic charge because of the properties of momentum involved. It is all very reflexive in nature.  the net out put of an electric current at the end of any work done with it in all kinds of electrical devices or just in carrying the charge over long wire distances is the output of infrared photons mostly. The photons then are immediately related to the grinding resistance to momentum of the generator that starts the process.  Therefore it all comes down to what I would call conservation of momentum.  I am talking about common denominators of photons then as code for releasing the internal energy of residual momentum.  If you wanted to believe in the big bang theory or a small bang theory among other bangs in the universe than then  momentum is the intergalactic currency and possibly a better metric than the speed of light.

All energy in the universe is derived from Momentum (?) Maybe a great bet.

Hard to believe for the uninitiated but all of the energy in the universe is probably derived from momentum. That is just mass with velocity . If that is entire reservoir of energy the metric to measure it is relatively complicated and has no relationship to the speed of light constant unless used to measure distances between momentum cells if close enough to reflect light

Survival of the fittest/ reproducting and fixing probability .

I am still trying to find a mathematic proof to explain why life desires to survive and to reproduce in a uncaring universe.  The t whole idea behind

Darwin's theory of evolution  is that the urge to survive and to reproduce is some innate sense of nature.  animals with instinct more than consciousness or bacterial size life forms all exhibit adaptations for survival and for successful reproduction. so do plants but plants get strange when they require animal species like bees to pollinate for them.  The phonic code mostly originating from the sun is responsible for life as we know it.  I say code since the discovery that photons don't actually transmit energy though time and space....they merely send code that finds the energy as dark momentum of motion of everything where it is intercepted by mater that can read that part of the photon (code) spectrum.  To find the answer I go back to the multi variable probability thesis for my theory of everything in the cosmos.  Life by trying to survive and reproduce is actually mathematically trying to fix probability and its outcomes.  Finally I am on to the answer to the problem. I actually do mean fixing the odds.  that is exactly what Darwinism is about.  fixing the odds for survival and for reproduction.  But that's all pretty arbitrary.  having the odds favor one life form over another does not explain the need and desire for organisms including plants to survive and do more than thrive if possible.  I already mathematically determined that those who pray to God are also trying to fix probability so it can benefit them and their interests. fixing the odds for being favorable to a species explains some of the how but none of the why.  it maybe we have to think of the biosphere as on a different than human time scale and that we are just part of the slime that is in interactive mode where our thousands of years in existence are merely a few second for outside observers. In that perspective were just part of the geophysical process creating vast sedimentary layers of what we leave behind in millions and billions of years. 

so it has to come down to probability and making probability predictable.

Remodeling The Universe taking into account underlying momentum of everything.

I always wondered if there was some identifying feature of water above a dam or a water fall that made it different than water below the dam or water fall.  Scientists can take samples above and below and find its just water in both places.  Ok there maybe slightly less atmospheric pressure weighing on the water above than below.  Other differences  are slightly less density above the dam than below.  Very slight that is.  Energy potential of falling  above the dam  is the same as below that is if another dam or water fall lies below the first level.  Water above the dam is basically equivalent to water below until that is it finds itself in motion falling over the edge or down into a channel hosting a turbine.  You can then say that momentum potential is X above the dam and unknown at best below the dam from zero to whatever.  Lets then pivot to whole galaxies.  Spiral arms of galaxies apparently collapsing into the center  where black holes are now widely believed to occupy are then momentum potential zones like the water above the dam.  Nigel Calder wrote that book about our violent universe I read so long ago.  Everything is ready to collide and blow up out there in the cosmos. Most of what we can see because of the light spectrum is all about stuff that has violent  stuff happening to it or is collapsing , colliding or just blowing up.  We see the hot spots after momentum has gone over the edge so to speak over the falls or into the turbines running the generators.

Momentum mapping the  universe then we might see it as many bubbles growing and colliding with each other and we map out the interactions from what we can observe thanks to photons recording these incidents.  If you then want to find dark energy it is clearly then the parts of the material cosmos that have not yet collided and remain invisible till they do.  Active zones then are momentum collision areas .  Two fields can intercept each other causing a ripple effect or a wave of momentum collisions that fans out or is generated like  a wave.  So maybe the galaxies  and other features in the cosmos are  actually just the hot zone of interaction and everything else we don't see Is that pure momentum unrealized we know resides in water above the dam or waterfall.  That remodeling was fairly simple . Its dynamism is for the liminal active area to move though dull lifeless areas of the cosmos till the momentum collision happens when it does.  Then to see all the photons observed as code that reveals it take me some more thought to know what that does for the theory.

Unintelligent Darwinism

First of all I am in complete agreement with Darwin's theory of evolution. We even now know how it works thanks to understanding the DNA molecule. Getting that out of the way I can now talk about intelligent design.  Bunk.  Complete bunk but as for unintelligent Darwinism  I can tell you that the theory of evolution does not sufficiently explain questions of why.  I know science is fine and well dealing with how things work and that the why question really might not mater most of the time.  Why thing work the way they do implies that there is underlining intelligence making things happen.  To ask why something happens or works in nature the way it does assumes some underlining intelligence or even a creator.  We as criminals why they committed a crime.  That does not mean we have to accept their explanations.  Most criminals just enjoyed committing crimes and know that admitting that is not in their best interest when the legal system is inquiring.   "The murder was fun I enjoyed it." is what most of them would save if they felt being honest was something criminals do.  In ancient Rome Emperors were ever so happy to admit that they enjoyed committing their crimes in public. No tribunal was going to judge a living god.   The process of evolution obviously leads to more adept species more able to survive in nature than their forbearers.  The process of evolution does indeed lead to more adept survival skills and overall survival of species.  Evolution actually does improve physiology and even mental capacity of species for survival.  Evolution works because species seem to want to survive and reproduce and that reproduction furthers the benefits of evolution.  That's HOW but not WHY! 

If we ask any species why it wants to survive and reproduce or survive to reproduce the best answers would seem to come from humans of course .  Why?   Lots of rationalizations and like the criminal murderer humans best answer is "I want to survive and reproduce prolifically because it is fun." Difficulty surviving like suffering from starvation or disease is not fun.   Unfortunately those of us who are convinced that nature is completely indifferent about what happens in nature including with us humans then have to wonder why should the benefits of evolution even mater?  why does survival of species and /or successful prolific reproduction even mater ?  I suppose it might be all about God being pure probability.  "Anything is possible with God."  Betterment of species though successful reproduction, successful survival and evolution over time is not just some random probability it almost seems as if it should be a conscious process even for single cell micro organisms including plants.  So life is a complex chemicals reaction that once started wants to evolve to be a more complex set of chemical reactions that aims for better survival and more prolific reproduction making super species with super physiology to thrive in the real existing environment and even sometimes to alter the environment for their own benefit via evolutionary process. Well that sounds way too intelligent to be just something that happens with a spark of lightening or static electricity to be unintended , undesired and the product of an uncaring universe?


Am I finding God in the details?  No.  Though I now believe if there is a God he has to be pure probability which is what this chain of articles is all about in this blog.   Research I am doing in the nature of photons and electro magnetic disturbances from which they come from in mater has led me to understand that the universe does have more intelligence than we give it credit for.  We can see that the way crystals grow.  In real natural Chrystal growth more than one kind of crystal can grow in the same place . We find inclusions of one crystal that grew simultaneously in another.  Some how or other with valences of atoms those atoms were able to communicate to other atoms how to fall into place and find lower energy levels with higher energy bonds to keep them together.  If you look at a piece of granite the three major constituent minerals that are crystalized in it know how to separate and from their own interlocking structures in the whole rock mass.  That's because photons don't carry energy but transmit code and the same is true of electromagnetic disturbances from which the photons are derived. There is semantics and communications going on.  We know of dna cell receptors and they also communicate with atoms and molecules around them. Cells organize all sorts of molecules  in just the right ways to further their interests of survival and of reproduction for survival.   The dna itself is a communications device . Just one at a higher level than the subatomic semantics code of photons and electro magnetism of sub atomic particles.   With all thing being guided by probability  some form of basic intelligence via communications of photons and electro magnetism is part of that probability.

In animal species going back to Darwin's discoveries we find that one species can fill in for anther species with the purpose of being a certain kind of predator in the food chain. Where say cat species are lacking some rodent can evolve into a predator that is acts the same way consuming the same diets as cats .  Owls are predatory birds that may have evolved from non predatory plant eating birds over millions of years? Just because their food might over populate without predators around  is not unintelligent.  First there is a food source that is untapped to begin with and then the evolutionary development happens over time  because of species resourcefulness.  Too intelligent for being completely random ?    That is why a greater intelligence in the cosmos would seem to solve the problem of Why evolve at all just to be more successful at surviving to be more successful at reproducing.  The grandly intelligent ecologists believe that nature wants or need to regulate over population of lower food chain species and that there is a great chain of being where no element can be touched or the entire system of ecology unravels.  That's far more intelligence than the blind reality of nature and that's the reason environmentalism is absurd and unscientific. Nature is as happy with imbalance and with balance and that concept is just yin and yang analogy pushed on something entirely indifferent to any probable event. 

So where is the intelligence. It is in the spectrum of photons and in the periodic table and evolved into the double helix structures of dna.  DNA is a relentless self replication machine but it can do just fine with huge masses of single cell organism.  What reason does it have to evolve millions of variant species then?  None that would be intelligent?  but maybe.

So you say show me an empirical experiment that  proves there is intelligence in the cosmos.  A lot of people would say . "I just read what you wrote and this is what I think about it."   That is the transmission of a message with semantics and code that I used to transmit it with.   Then there is a better experiment you already know about.  You can make a hole in a microwave oven door and microwaves will be detected coming out the door from the source of the radiation with in.  But a thin aluminum perforated skin over the open door of the microwave and no microwaves will escape.  Everything is coded. If your instrument that detects microwaves is functioning you either will know microwaves are there or not.  Get rose colored glasses put the glasses on and you see pink.  The glasses are sorting out the photons that are not pink and absorbing more of those than otherwise though maybe not all because you see more colors than just pink.  The old theory said the pink you were seeing was transmitting energy to your eye's retinas.  there your brain can read the incoming code.  having found that no energy is actually being transmitted though space to get to the rose colored glasses and that the apparent energy comes from the materials the glass is made of itself mostly via underlying momentum already possessed by the atoms that make up the glass because they are traveling though the universe relative to some  non moving point somewhere at a tremendous velocity.  Then the photons as mere code are just communicating. sun light then is not feeding the surface of the biosphere with energy but just actually finding a code to release energy already there and waiting .  The coding then influences the probable outcomes and it would seem they are communicating intelligence of being.  The sun then is making much of life on earth flourish survive and multiply. 

Take the basic carbon quiz to find out how to save the world from climate change/ global warming theology.

Take the Atmospheric Carbon Quiz? See How Smart You Are. So You Say You Believe In Global Warming ? OK Lets See What You Really know.

Take the Atmospheric Carbon Quiz? See How Smart You Are You Say You Believe in Global Warming ? OK, Take the Quiz and Find Out What You Really Know About Carbon Dioxide in the Earth's Atmosphere. Get All Questions Right and Win a Noble Peace Prize Lex Loeb Contributor Network . This is exercises is not about global warming or climate change. It is about basic scientific facts about earth's atmosphere. The quiz is really simple and multiple choice. Just pick the best choice per question and then go to the end of the article to see the correct answers. You must get all of the answers right to win a Nobel peace prize otherwise you fail the quiz. If you fail the quiz then you might want to brush up on your science studies. These questions are multiple choice. Pick the answer to each question that is closest to the scientific fact or to estimated and abbreviated numbers: . . . . . . . . . . . . The Atmospheric Carbon Quiz: Question 1: Most of the volume of air is made of what? (A) Carbon Dioxide. (B) Oxygen. (C) Pollution. (D) Empty Space. Question 2: How much gas is in earth's air around sea level compared to an equal volume of liquid water? (A) 5 percent (B) Half (C) 1/800th (D) none Question 3: Approximately how much does a cubic foot of air weigh at sea level on earth? (A) 1/2 pound (B) 0.10 pounds (C) One ATM (D) 0.075 pounds Question 4: Which weighs more? Hot air or Cold air? A. Cold Air B. Hot Air C. Both weigh the same amount. 5. What is the most prevalent gas in the atmosphere? (A) Oxygen. (B) Carbon Monoxide (C) Carbon Dioxide (D) Nitrogen (E) Xenon (F) Methane 6. What percentage of The Earth's atmosphere in parts per million per dry volume is Carbon dioxide? (A) 20.95 % (B) 78.08 % (C) 4.0 % (D) 0.00005 % (E) 0.0387% 7. What percentage of the earth's atmosphere ,in parts per million, is 10,000 parts per million of Carbon Dioxide (enough to start being toxic to people an animals)? (A) 50% (B) 1% (C) 0.05% (D) 10% (E) 37.7% 8. Which Gas constituent atom has the greatest relative atomic mass? (A) Carbon. (B) Nitrogen. (C) Oxygen. 9. Does Carbon Dioxide in earth's atmosphere React in normal earth conditions with other gases or water vapor in the atmosphere or act as a catalyst? (A) yes. (B) no it is generally very stable as a gas molecule. 10. At the present levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and all other carbon gases put together which best describes the concentration in parts per 10,000 per volume? (A) 1 in ten thousand parts (B) more than 279 in ten thousand parts (C) 12 in ten thousand parts (D) less than 4 in ten thousand parts 11. If the amount of Carbon doubles in the atmosphere in the next 50 years because of out of control industrial growth what would be the maximum amount of carbon in the atmosphere in parts per million per volume? (A)10,000 parts per million per volume (B)90,000 parts per million per volume (C)776 parts per million per volume (D)3000 parts per million per volume. 13. Are there renegade scientists who believe that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is getting dangerously low to support the earth's photosynthetic plant life on land because prehistoric times had much much larger amounts of atmospheric and dissolved carbon in the oceans? (A) Yes (B) No 14. Is it possible for gases to escape from frozen ice or to enter frozen ice the way old mildew tasting ice from your home refrigerator freezer tastes when left in the freezer too long? (A) Yes (B) No 15. Is it possible for a gas to suck up heat from the atmosphere and discharge the heat into the cold night air or up at higher elevations into outer space sort of the way an air conditioner cooler works by retaining the heat long enough to transfer it away from hotter areas? Is methane a heat sink gas that can be used in cooling systems? (A) Yes (B) No 16. What happens when a gas is heated? (A) It rises (B) It gains kinetic energy and moves at a more rapid speed in the atmosphere. (C) most gases with possible exception of water vapor clouds that have dust seeds tend to take an amorphous diffusion though the atmosphere. (D) All of the above. 17. How does a gas in the atmosphere make objects on the ground and the surface of the ocean hot? (A) They bump into those objects transferring kinetic energy of motion. (B) They radiate infrared and other types of electromagnetic waves into empty space that get absorbed by material objects that retain that heat energy. (C) It really does not mater how much heat is retained by the relatively rarefied gases in the atmosphere because the sun rays hitting the physical surface of earth is many times more efficient as direct exposure. This direct exposure makes surfaces hotter than secondary re-radiation of solar energy from gases in the atmosphere. (D)There is evidence that the earth's surface warms the atmosphere perhaps more efficiently than a relatively diffuse atmosphere can warm the earth's surface. (E) All or any of the above. 18. If it were true that Mars could be made habitable for life from earth by pumping carbon dioxide and other gases into it's diffuse existing atmosphere would that atmosphere need to have more atmospheric pressure than the earth's to be effective especially if Mars does not have sufficient ocean equivalents of surface liquid water? (A) Yes (B) No 19. Which of the following conditions will make an actual greenhouse with flowers growing in side of it cooler? (A) painting the floor of the greenhouse black. (B) Sealing the greenhouse so out door air can't get in. (C)taking the windows out so the open atmosphere and pumping in carbon dioxide to replace the effects of the window panes. (D) increasing the sun's exposure on the greenhouse by having mirrors around it reflect more light in. 20. Scientists say that if you have a methane gas stove in your kitchen and no way to light the gas so it burns you can still cook with it if you expose it to sun light because methane gas can absorb 22-25 times the energy of carbon dioxide exposed to solar energy and retain it longer. (A) True (B) False 21. Polar bears survived the ice age and as a consequence they also survived the greatest melting of ice in the last 30-40 thousand years. (A) True (B) False 22. If a group of scientists predict that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is going to cause temperatures to rise on earth and data is collected that shows their thesis may be wrong, which of these answers should they not be. (A) A bit skeptical of their hypothesis and their conclusions. (B) somewhat skeptical (C) Angry that the data does not conform to their advanced training and logic. (D) Feeling like they may have made a mistake or entered some wrong assumptions in the way they generated the original thesis. 23. The ancient Maya thought that if they sacrificed human being to gods that control the weather and ate parts of their sacrificial victims that they would get more than enough rain needed to grow luxuriant crops needed to maintain large populations. If the Maya were right about the world ending in 2012 then they must have been good at predicting the weather with the magic of human sacrifice rituals? (A) True (B) False 24. In the prehistoric times sea levels on earth have been as much as 300 to 500 ft higher than they are today and 300 to 500 feet lower than they are today? (A) true (B) false _____________________________________________________________________________ Answers: (warning you are the genius tell me if I have a typo or got any wrong )use these answers to cheat with if necessary: 1=D 2=C 3=D 4=A 5=D 6=E 7=B 8=B 9=B 10=D 11=C 12=unlucky 13=A 14=A 15=A 16=D 17=E 18=A 19=D 20=B 21=A 22=C 23=B 24=A . Close

Physicists have been fudging their numbers for years not accounting for the huge amount of energy that is released if say two planets collide .

The people at Cern are concerned with momentum but not  momentum that underlies existence.  The Cern complex is traveling though the universe at very high speed measured in thousands if not hundreds of thousands of meters per second.  It is traveling as fast as Switzerland is and the Alps. If some Asteroid suddenly appears the size of manhattan with a depth of a couple of miles  and strikes the earth at high velocity . It has the force of both the movement of the earth and the asteroid combined..  That can be lethal to at least most of the surface of the earth.  Out in space on both the asteroid and the earth before they collide its just like here on earth. we hardly feel like the planet is moving. We have no sensation that the earth is moving. Same is true on the asteroid.  They don't start to feel each other's influence till close enough that gravity between the two causes some tidal effects that quikly increase as the two get closer into their collision. Then when they come together part of the earth just vaporizes as does most of the asteroid  that just hit it.  The combined effect of the explosion on impact is greater than 1000s of nuclear bombs all going off at once.  So there you have instant dark energy.  That water above the dam that will eventually fall and cause the generator turbines to spin looks just like water below the dam with that energy left out.  potential energy above the dam is real but there is actually no test with out letting it fall to the turbines to detect it.  The water molecules don't behave any different above or below the dam. surface tension is the same, density of the liquid is the same.  in the cosmos the energy of motion gets to be astronomical everything is moving.  Some percentage of everything will eventually collide. Chances are that virtually everything that can be seen in the distant universe because of light is a product of some collision.  That's light energy because if is after a collision.  before the collisions it is dark energy.

Dark Mater is Just cosmic momentum and photons are the code that can instantly put a stop or near stop to that momentum....leads to a new momentum frames of reference relativity. Remember the young double slit experiment is an illusion.

These physicists really don't get it. Can't get it. I am slowly figuring it all out, my latest is to confirm frequency and wavelength dynamics of photons in space by placing detectors everywhere in the space to confirm the existence and all I get is shadows form them. curvature of space because of frame of reference at a distance makes one wonder exactly where the observer is standing to make the observation. being a frame of reference then from a different view point then... there still is no curvature of space or space time. and the photons make straight lines from their own perspective but then who rides a photon to observe them? The clencher is to suddenly realize that everything in space is moving and thus has to have good old fashioned Newtonian / pre Newtonian momentum. Turns out photons actually stop subatomic particles in their spots or slow them down dramatically . The more the photon slows the subatomic "object" and stops it the more forceful is the reaction to the onward moving mass with the existing momentum. That delivers the frequency going to that of a gamma ray that codes for a nearly complete stop. I have not quite figured our the wavelength that derives from that per each photon on the spectrum...not yet getting closer and closer though and soon I will be the only person in this part of the galaxy / universe to know it. What happens is as an electron is slowed or stopped it seems to be activated and flies out the back window as if in a moving car breaking that car window because it suddenly stops or nearly does when the car keeps moving foreward.. I got that part the wavelength has something to do with how the window breaks and angular momentum. It is like a two ball transmission system I invented to simplify gear shifts some years ago ...well maybe? That quiet unseen momentum everything has moving at the speed of the galaxy and the part of the universe where our galaxy is moving is the dark energy that these people are seeking . I figured that out and a whole new relativity . Angular momentum and gravity being Hot has everything to do with gravity ...so we can now link magnetism with the electromagnetic disturbances that give us the waves and frequencies observed in the old science. Its starting to make too much sense. This makes no sense unless you realize that the reason they read that photons become 30 percent heavier than electrons is just because of the momentum as dark energy and photons as code that instantly puts a stop to momentum where it interacts. I figured it out . they probably will never will.
See More

Einstein's Impossible Point of View Frame of Reference.

Ok . I am standing on the shoreline watching a ship go by and I see a rock falling from a mast to the floor of the ship.  I am pretty much standing still verses the ship being on shore.  I  see the rock falling in what is an arc as the ship moves forward. On board the ship my video cam shows the rock falling straight down. Both points of view are true and real.   OK.   But then there is Einstein's thought experiment with the rocket or the elevator and laser light going from one wall to the other perpendicular to the acceleration of the elevator or the rocket ship.  Where am I able to stand still and observe that?  Ok so skipping ahead I guess I go out and look for black holes?  Even so my stationary point of view is impossible except as that mental experiment. I have undone this problem in the past with the simple observation that space has no built in metrics  . Einstein ultimately makes the speed of light as a constant in a vacuum the metric of space and time.    That is especially an impossible metric point of view certainly because light can only be assumed to be  in existence between two objects where as it actually might not be.  That's the box with the cat that is both dead and living at the same time.  I am not saying the speed of light has not bee measured accurately or observed but I am saying that the observation with light gets tricky where you are at a distance observing a flash of light on one wall of a space ship coming from the other.   We can test the theory by repeating an experiment with light multiple times and we know the probability of sending light where we direct it so long as there is a detector a reflector for our distance observation.

Photons "feed" on momentum that an object in motion is not even aware it has. No energy is transmited though space via a photon . It is just code.

If I had magic powers to do this.....A car moving at 65 mph has a bowling ball in the front seat. The car stops suddenly and the bowling ball flies though the windshield because it had no seat belt. No magic required for that one . But what if I want to make the bowling ball in the front seat fly out the back window as the car is moving? That's where I need the special magic. I stop the ball with the momentum it has in the car running forward and not stopping at 65 mph.... If I can stop the bowling ball it will seem to fly out the window and then drop to the ground probably rolling in the same direction slowly as the car because it hit the back window to escape. How do I stop the bowling ball independently of the moving car? Possibly I can do it with a very high powered laser because photons can do this to sub atomic particles. I don't think any physicists out there will agree with me but I am 100 percent correct. Photons actually slow down sub atomic particles they intercept and the degree to which they slow down is based on the frequency and wave properties along the entire EM spectrum. It is an Einstein Relativity killer . That's because photons have no mass and that's because the whole story includes space and time and the frames of reference physics. The thing about subatomic particles including electrons is they have set set charges and set connections which is why this effect results in changes in angular momentum. In terms of time and space it would seem that photons can slow parts mater down just like the bowling ball that is in relationship to the motion of the car carrying it. I might be able to perform a laser experiment with something much more massive than an electron to show it is true. I can already do it with electrons. If I can do it with a bowling ball I could create a source of energy that has nearly infinite availability except that it takes substantial energy to generate enough photons to apply it and you do much more physical work than what you net in photon energy equivalence.

Finally an alien bowling ball explantion for how exactly photons slow down mater as code without mass and without energy in transmission.

You have to read the blog from the beginning and the other Lex Loeb blogs to fully understand the new physics.  I think the last post left something to be desired or several things.  This is how you understand it in a frames of reference, new relativity perspective (it is new because it was a false assumption of the time that photons had mass.  what photons have is the ability to have an analogy in the thought process and an effect as mass but actually have no mass and are only code.)  I keep pushing that because I have the proof for it in empirical findings.   The question then is if that is true how it is that the code works at the subatomic level.  I was saying it changed angular momentum which is of course correct but it still desires more of an explanation.  The source of the energy the code relies on for mater to act upon being exposed to photons has been explained from coming from "dark energy" of momentum of mater.  that is to say mater moving with an entire galaxy say at a speed of say 60,000 meters per second against the background of space of other galaxies,  though I have explained that space has no metrics at all inherit in it,  then that 'dark energy' is the momentum of the objects in the galaxy that don't reveal themselves as having energy till they collide with either a stationary or a different moving toward it to create fireworks on impact. That is the energy tapped by the photons that have neither  mass nor energy in transit through space.  

How does the photon as code interact? If the code magically tells the subatomic particle it interacts with to tap energy than the momentum of that sub atomic particle has to decrease.   That is the same as slowing it down in one sense verses the velocity of everything else in its immediate vicinity as part of a material object.  How so?   The aliens more simply explain it as should be with a frames of reference analogy:  your car is moving at 65 miles per hour. you slam on the brakes and skid a bit and the car comes to a complete stop. you suddenly have no velocity and no momentum.  Ok you have the same car do the same thing and you have a bowling ball in the front seat and you stop suddenly and the bowling ball flies though the front window of the car because you had not put a seat belt around it.  Ok now instead you have some magical coding sent to the bowling ball resting in the front seat of your car moving at 65 mph. The code sent to the bowling ball tells it to have zero momentum.  The bowling ball does what the code says and it slows down to a stop suddenly while the car is still moving at a constant 65 mph .  The  bowling ball in various frames of reference is seen flying out the back window of the car at 65 mph.  An observer in the car see it fly though the window and people on the side walk are in danger seeing it coming out the window but not really flying towards them, 

This explains why gamma rays have a punch like they do at that highest energy level/ side of the spectrum.  It is not mass causing the subatomic destruction then of gamma rays.  Since all electrons have exactly the same charge that's where the angular momentum comes in because the shock of the photon bowling ball magic code change level of angular momentum meaning they just get dragged back to the nucleus  orbits after  this happens .


the code that takes energy out of the bank of momentum objects has can  create projectiles as the rest of the galaxy and mater keeps moving verses what slows down  because of hitting the brakes.