If There Was 100 percent certainty in the Universe we would not need probabilty.

If There was 100 percent certainty in the Universe we would not need probability. Maybe there is 100 percent certainty?    Probability is an interesting concept which seems to pertain to assaying the future rather than analyzing the past. It is pretty clear that if we know what happened in the past everything that happened was 100 percent certain so long as memory is good.  What is the probability of getting 4 Aces in a poker hand verses what was the probability of having that exact hand in a particular hand?  It was 100 percent certain because the event occurred.  Probability of that 4 aces card hand is not possible to change after the event occurs.  You can speculate about other possibilities that never happened . Yes the odds would be what future probability would be except all the hands of cards ever dealt are now history and cannot be changed.  There fore the past is at least theoretically 100% certain even if we don't have a clear memory of all of it or any of it.    The future is completely speculative and that is where probability seems to become most useful.  Probability allows us to predict future outcomes at least to some degree.  If this becomes a principle of physics then if we look back in space and time with astronomy then the probability of any of it is irrelevant.

Conditional Probability and Cosmology go back in history a long long way. God is the ultimate slot machine?

The question is when it comes to God being the ultimate slot machine the question is whether that slot machine runs with simulated probability or real open ended probability?   Of course it is natural probability .  A mistake of physicists is in thinking that probability somehow has to be simulated the way we humans game it: 


http://www.openbible.info/topics/all_things_are_possible  And yes I am not the first one to make this observation.  "With God, Jesus, all things are possible."   That really is saying the same thing except when it comes to conditional probability we see much of it starting with gravity which has a very high level of probability of occurrence.  Gravity seems to rule the universe in a way that that it independently can become the catalyst of much greater things and systems.


http://www.openbible.info/topics/all_things_are_possible

Gravity would seem to be the primary cause of most empirical probability. What is empirical probability?

What is Empirical Probability anyway?    Empirical Probability is where the 2nd law of thermodynamics goes badly wrong.  Usually it appears that gravity is responsible.  My research, given the thermodynamic  radiometer proof that gravity's is the net input of energy into a system or conglomeration actually transforms the laws of thermodynamics in a way I never initially realized.  So then the 2nd law of thermodynamics is not only flawed and in need of  a law to replace it.  Entropy is really at severe risk of disappearing as a viable concept.  That is because simple convergence of energy at a point is enough to contradict the whole scientific concept of entropy.  Well what then is a point?  A point is the convergence of energy and we know that energy will not converge without mass being available as  a means of "inducting" it.  If we refresh the idea that mass and energy can be converted from one to the other then a point is simply energy plus mater know to be converted to energy under the right conditions.)  So like the summation equation from the new laws of physics I published years ago, E + M*=P such that E is free energy added to a Mass form of energy for the total energy of the entire system P which is our point.  Sounds way too obvious?   since I originally published that thesis I never got around to updating it with some sense that maybe Mass is not converted to just energy but maybe has other components or does not actually convert at all given the mass defect problem.  In which case E + M*** = P so it really does not mater except that it destroys Entropy as viable scientific concept. 


With the best of our labeling super novae's phenomenology seen in Hubble telescope photographs we see anything but entropy result.  We see bilateral symmetry.  That is still empirical probability. I actually reinterpret those photos as being the aftermath of giant collisions and not of dying stars because of that bilateral symmetry.  The issue being entropy is that the destruction of a star in a super nova is anything but tending toward entropy given that all too obvious symmetry which has almost the appearance of a mirror image to it.  What we actually see is a more orderly event where total destruction of an enormous entity is enabling empirical probability with an almost infinite discharge of energy and an almost infinite destruction of mater, system, perhaps even time and space. 


The gravitational center is being discharged but at the same time we see eddies forming in the aftermath at a cold distance from the center of discharge.  Entropy if it exists in the explosion  , the moment of explosion or the event of super nova is very short lived.  A super nova should be the ultimate entropy event?  The observed symmetry raises grave concerns for the future of the 2nd law of thermodynamics until I have modified it as :  "Empirical probability is the future of any thermodynamic system."  Now don't quote me on that yet.  I have not got the right semantics yet.  It took a long time to advance to the concept and nomenclature of Empirical probability from multi variable probability (which it still is) .  Maybe the correct term is Retropy. or Reretropy. Yes It is Retropy.  Lex Retropy to be exact.  Retropy means regrowth of a system because empirical probability is one of the basic dimensions of the cosmos.  It is because components of mass and of energy whether the same or different have inherent empirical probability as the nature of their structures which is why multi variable probability with the semblance of order in the cosmos is a basic dimension.  It is the component of reality that frames our reference.


Something that frames our reference is generic probability of energy and mass as energy but because of mass defect I suspect that really the core of what makes mater different from energy is the probability dimension.  This maybe the reason why energy has no effect in space until it is absorbed or interacts with mass.  That little key to the universe is a sub atomic particle I will call the Lexitrophe in a process of Lexitrophiphy. It is the cause of retropy and reretropy which the apparent entropy of retropy.  The only reason we have any frame of reference is because of Euclidean like points in space where mater and energy combine or where energy combines to form mater and where mater takes a form that leads to predictable probabilities like symmetry.

Empirical Probability Theorem , The Undoing of Entropy and the Undoing of the second law of thermodynamics.

Empirical Probability theorem:   Empirical Probability Disproves The Second Law Of Thermodynamics And Also Demonstrates That Entropy Is A Temporary Condition  And Not A Final End Point of System Energy Nor Dispersal.   The proof is actually very simple:  Empirical Probability makes predictability of systems discernible  in advance where as Entropy is unpredictable and wanting. 

One example is a simulating random number generator.  Of course there is nothing random about random numbers generated by a generator because to be truly random they have to pass the test of randomness.  It is uncertain that random numbers actually exist in nature outside of our human capacity to facilitate them?  Simulated probability differs from Empirical probability because Simulated probability is designed to have an element of entropy in involved where as empirical probability as discerned in nature lends itself to vast potential predictability based on conditional probabilities of multiple variables. When this is simulated with artificial probability in a computer or a slot machine the simulation emphasizes a lack of predictability otherwise every player would win the game.

Empirical probability gives us the ability to  make very good predictions on a lot of things before they happen.  If Entropy was where everything was bound to go then our ability to predict probabilities would be impossible.  It requires no complicated proof  except to say we would not be able to predict the weather , the motion of stars and galaxies if entropy was a real phenomenon.

Striking out the second law of thermodynamics or modifying it we also need to add a third or forth law of thermodynamics that gravity is a property of thermodynamics.  That is a different story found on my other sites including Gravity is Hot and The New Laws of Physics by Lex Loeb.

"The second law of thermodynamics states that every energy transfer increases the entropy of the universe due to the loss of usable energy" Is incorrect.

Here is proof:    "*"    DID YOU SEE THAT?   LOOK AGAIN .  It is still there .  It looks just like this: "*"!    What is the point?  It is really basic empirical science.  You are looking at a computer screen of some sort and the original energy I expended to put that mark ("*") is able to be maintained right there where I put it in this paragraph.  So you say "Well the computer was never unplugged from the battery or the wall electric outlet.--It is regenerated constantly."  But that is not at all true. I typed the original "*" just like this one and the concept entered the computer memory even after I erased the page and turned off my computer.  You say well the digital /mechanical memory storage is anything but entropy.  That is correct.  Which is a part of the proof. The storage of this entire blurb is only recognized by computers and viewing devices as I wrote it in this form you are now witnessing because the computer recognizes statistical probability at some atomic or molecular level. Is it bits of binary logic that enables the coding in the storage system? Variables of statistical probability is all that makes this paragraph different than this shorter paragraph: 

"slkdfnl glkf wejklf, glkjsdf. glskdflsd, lkg  ,qickwe, slkdf, gk, slkjklkds" woeir"., soiern. "

Well, you say it just takes more time for the second law of thermodynamics to undo the original order and we all know that digital information storage degrades over time.  Actually it does not so long as it correctly passes from one memory system to the next. The paragraphs above may both be immortal and hence they are a perfect proof that entropy has an impossible task for itself in finding a state where all energy is unusable to maintain a system.  Systems don't degrade into a state of infinite chaos because that is only a temporary phase.  Every odd number is preceded by and followed by an even number .  That is not an accident or a man made contrivance.  Statistical probability requires it,  Ah then there is that number zero (0) but it is not a number or is it?  if zero is between one  and minus one that automatically makes it an even number.  You think I am joking? Numbers are about logic for representing what we do for counting.  The ultimate proof that entropy is nonsense and the second law of thermodynamics is erroneous , is to tell your physics professor that you figured it out zero is an even number.  Yes you will get a failing grade and it will cost you your academic career yet it is absolutely positively correct.  What does that have to do with the first paragraph and the proof that entropy is a complete misconception in physics and thermodynamics?   That is the simple part of the proof.  It is called Poof.   Poof is what a magician does. Poof and there is that "*" all over again . It came out of nothing only because zero is an even number.  The probability that zero is an odd number is zero like the zero itself. 

The probability that every other number in the scheme of numbers is odd or even is absolutely predictable and true if you count to infinity in positive digits or negative digits.  Systems may degrade from what seems more complex orders to what appears to be chaos then just when you think that is the case you see the formation of order  again.  It is not just life that seems to buck the theory of the second law of thermodynamics where: The second law of thermodynamics states that every energy transfer increases the entropy of the universe due to the loss of usable energy.  It is such strange phenomena of stars and galaxies being nearly exactly the same shapes and formations from a few light years away to billions of light years away.  Entropy should not lead you to that conclusion.

I set up a new experiment to prove the thesis.   The idea of the experiment was to see if I could get  a very long string to tie it sell in knots just by moving it in random motions.  And of course it did  but it did not do it every time if you had a limit on the window of time to conduct the experiment.  If there is no window of time, no limit of time, in inevitably will become knotted.  That is when multi-variables enter the picture because there is more than one way to become knotted or if you prefer the word tangled in itself.  There is more than one sequence that ends  up tangled.  You can attempt to make it a trick you perform once you realize the sequence of movements required as a motif.  That leads to the idea of a multi-variable generator or calculator. That is something like a computer that can record every possible game of chess that could ever be played.  There might even be a finite number of possible games that end in a draw or with check mate.  Newton had his objects that stayed at rest or stayed in motion and those are both probabilities of being an object in a universe where there is energy.  That is a binary probability right there.  In motion or at rest or both because of a frame of reference misunderstanding.  If I were to fix Newton's laws by adding a new very basic law of nature I would add one that says something like "randomness tends toward order if any smaller component part has any seed of order to begin with."  I would strike anything to do with entropy and say that there is no such thing as Irony.

The idea that we have one big infinite universe happens to be a coincidence:

I am getting even closer to figuring out how The probability of the symmetrical (yes this is a semantic transformation for good reason) is a basic dimension of cosmic reality.  I never thought I would get beyond the last intuition on the subject.  The mistake I was making was in not defining probability as a multi variable "coincidence".  Coincidence is a weird if not almost magical concept.  probability of events is actually just their coincidence and we keep a record of probabilities as events as statistics.  What it means is probability is always about coincidence.  When you go back to quantum mechanics and introduce probability it might be the coincidence of expectations or simply that you can have more than one identical water molecule if not gazillions of them and we do.  The fact or evidence or coincidence that we have so many identical molecules across the spectrum of possible combinations of atoms is the wholesale opposite of entropy.  Because you can have duplication running out to almost the infinite in number of anything is amazing as a large scale coincidence.  To think that there are water molecules billions of light years away that are exactly the same as the ones here that is not just coincidence it is super symmetry or imbedded symmetry and ubiquitous or seemingly so.  That does not explain how probability of coincidence is a constitutional dimension of cosmic reality but it does lead to a mathematical way to prove it.  There is yet one more major analogy and that has to do with basic symmetry observed in nature such that the northern hemisphere of a spherical planet or star seems to be the mirror image of the southern hemisphere and when we see a super nova we see symmetrical jets in opposite directions which would be very odd for anything entering a state of entropy.  The new law of physics is that Any semblance of order retained in entropy means there is no entropy. It can be symmetrical , bilateral, identical particles or similarities of coincidence.
Any coincidence would be any entanglement of atoms or molecules by valence or  just physical entanglement.  Disproving the existence of entropy is easy.  Showing why there is no entropy because probability of coincidence is an eternal dimension of many variables.  Don't worry I am never going to propose a probability wave to replace notions of gravity waves and other such nonsense .  It is clear that in some parts of the universe there is more convergence of coincidental probability than other parts.   That's more like string theory.  Maybe gravity is what makes coincidence possible by engaging things whether by attraction or least resistance theory