Thursday, January 28, 2016

Unbelievable. I just stopped all photons in the universe in their place--froze them by changing the speed of light constant to zero by contacting their vacuum central authority....

So  what happens if I find a way to stop the speed of light in the entire universe?  Reviewing the theories of general and special relativity you see how integral the constant speed of light is to the whole thesis.  No mater what the velocity of mater is the impact of intercepting photons is going to have the same exact "force"  though I now consider it not a force but a coded persuasion.  So instead of building a giant super collider to find the underlying fabric of the vacuum of space, I find a way to use coded photons along spectral lines to send a message to the cosmos itself to stop every photon in it's place immediately.  (yes I may have just done it!)  Did you notice the effect?   So you are skeptical.  He can't do that.  What central authority in the universe controls all of the photons?  It must be far far away beyond our galaxy....?  Well no. As the main proponent of the study of vacuumology it seems to me that the central authority of the entire universes is one unit of empty vacuum space in the entire cosmos.  So lets say the super collider researches do discover some underlying geometry,or as Einstein called it symmetry of space, then I should be able immediately ,where ever I am in the universe, to access the central authority that will stop all photons in their place.  This is not just a thought experiment.  I propose actually proving it possible with a live experiment.  Does this mean I can also stop all the kinetic energy in the universe at the same time?  I can't say yet because mater occupies the vacuum and defines it but it is not clear if there can be any central control for mater in kinetic states --the normal for mater.  Photons if they travel in linear or curved pathways according to Einstein, require that open vacuum .distances between spots of mater in the universe is where photons travel rather inside solid mater in which they behave differently--slowing down or even disappearing or transforming to lower energy levels.  Stopping photons in their tracks  means your eye will see exactly the last thing you saw or have no input data at all. Still there would be no way to detect photons in space.  very curious. The photons themselves may have no sense of moving at all even when they are.  I rather doubt the universe's structure changes at all freezing photons in their place.  I have to do the experiment again. Don't worry you are not going to die.  I just did it and you survived if you are reading this.

What I want to do is change the frame or reference for observing photons if you understand my discovery.

Sunday, January 17, 2016

Spectral Symbolism in the Universe: A whole new way to view the cosmos and maybe a clue as to how it really works.

Since the discovery that photon may not actually transmit energy though space but rather transmit a code built from the electro magnetic spectrum . The though process leads to a conclusion that there is a spectrum of mater too, also having a code.  Yes we have it codified already in the periodic table but most periodic tables do not link the electro magnetic spectrum to this separate interactive spectrum of mater that includes whole atoms, molecules and sub atomic particles.  Some elements will completely ignore photons allowing them to pass though and other will absorb or modify the photons received. But then again the whole em spectrum is not universally going to behave with all elements and vise versa.

Not only do we have this giant flow chart showing what might absorb every color of visible light but say red or blue allowing a gem stone to have a deep blue or red color as seen by our eyes but we have a vast array of possibilities and probability makes every thing possible though only where it is possible with a match between photons and sub atomic/ atomic particles.   We observe the universe now with mass spectrometers and we infer and deduce what distant planets and stars are made of looking at the mass spectrometer charts from our vaporizing various types of atoms here on earth and making a calibration. Our  astronomers are already coding.  Guess what?  The universe then has to be coding and reading code too.

I am not falling into the trap of analogy like the people who see the cosmos as one giant computer generated game  or a projected hologram.  I am just saying that the universe entirely able to send code and read it and does.  The problem is that diffuse long distance sources of photons are only going to send relatively vague information because one thing could be code for another.  I am talking about closer range. Inside the sun or the earth for example, photons are going to send code and stratify into zones of photons that send code that is received in stratified mater or even plasma.  We do already know there is stratification on the sun/ in the sun-- some by density and some by features created by electro-magnetism. There  is a sea of photons in stars that may engulf the entire body of the star and be infused though out the entire structure.  I am not concerned here with revealing the details I can see in photographs from different wave length view of the sun's surface provided by NASA's probe's observations.  I am concerned here with taking the EM spectrum and charting  the largest areas of correspondence to the periodic table and the sub atomic table of interactions to create a map or a code book for the next step in this research.   I am always surprised that the atmosphere of the earth can filter out high energy photons and not let them pass though the atmosphere let alone the center of the earth.  I am also fascinated that photons can theoretically be sent on an infinite trip in a piece of fiber optic cable that is a perfect circle.....and even if it does this at a somewhat slower rate than it would pass though a vacuum , it is not absorbed and is coded to continue passing though forever.

I am calling the new field Symbolics because I don't like terms like symbolism which gets over used in academia as an analogy for everything.  Symbolism becomes the whole point of the field of the humanities when the academics get excited about translating languages or at least by analogy. I am not trying to anthropomorphize physics or even suggest that that there is a language of the universe.  

No I am going that far because I don't know stars are communicating with other stars or that the sun really is the real mono god of the earth that we can pray to ancient Egyptian style.  I am just saying we are using a code and the universe itself appears to have active coding  but we have to decipher the relationships of the coding the way our astronomers are trying but with a computer map and symbolics dictionary of sorts to see patterns rather than to try and translate.  I actually do believe we humans can read messages we see in the cosmos just as we can see constellations but that is our fantasy....This coding is real.

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Since discovering that photons do not transmit "energy" but rather code that finds energy in atoms and enhance that existing energy, I realize that maybe there is yet another new law of phsysics related to conservation of Photons

The idea that photons only transmit code and not energy that enhances existing atomic/ sub atomic  material forms of mater and that e=mc2 says it is quite possible if we move what photons do into the realm of 'nuclear physics and energy' and out of the realm of transmitted though space energy that is somehow tied to conservation of energy  then it totally explains wavelength and frequency being wholly properties of the detectors/ mater and not of em photons that never interact with each other in space.  It clears up the problem of mass defect . 

So as these ideas started to sink into my head and I started looking at electro magnetism and photons as code re-layers , which is how we humans often use them, (to transmit radio programs etc)  I re observed candles burning  and other phenomena.  So then I started seeing things in a new way. 
the tendency to see photons as energy transmissions is hard to scrap from the mind.  I looked at solar energy panels and then just realized a night ago that there maybe such a thing as conservation of photons ....we can drop photons entirely from conservation of energy even if we are using a pure infrared heat lamp because we can account for virtually all the energy at the level of atoms and the visible and invisible photons from such lamps are not needed to conserve all the energy in the system at all.  So then photons have their own conservation.  which I now believe is one to one ratio.  Anywhere on the spectrum of em photons convert to a different photon if any  and if not 'retired' or lost due to radiation that becomes so distant it never reaches mater again.  That would still be a one to one ratio.  so if solar panels in their position any second of the day received a million photons per square meter under such and such conditions then the energy they had to produce photons in the entire electric grid where the current goes would equal exactly that many new photons sent into space in what ever reactions happen ...especially resistance or work energy .  I would assume less photons result than are re-radiated from solar panels?  which in that case means some would be 'retired' .  I have no idea what that would mean but then it could be that exactly the same number  go in as ultimately come out in a time delay manner from the entire system?

As I say I have no idea.  this is all new.  new to me even though I am inventing or discovering it.  I continue to research the problem .  I believe that there is conservation of electro magnetic energy / photons separate from chemical physical conservation of energy at the atomic/ sub atomic level.  two different sets of conservation systems now.  And it does seem to be solving basic problems.  Now for doubters , we have this high power laser experiment.  The laser is so powerful and consumes so much electric power it can vaporize a hole though solid steel four meters thick...so we assume naturally that the reason why is energy is being transmitted though space that we put into the laser as photon that have the energy to make the hole.  But not necessarily if that photon laser beam is really just code sent though space in a coherent beam that tells atoms of particular types that they are going to vaporize because of the density of the beam.  of course as the beam hits the steel it turns red and white hot. the atoms actually get hot to vaporize and from that new photon radiation comes off. at what rate?  one for one in the whole system?

No I don't know if photons get retired.  They may actually just be god particles or either that relays code information and not energy itself.  That does not mean they don't pack a punch as we know you get a sun burn from ultraviolet rays or we sterilize apple juice  with ultraviolet .  So how to account for the conservation of energy and have the photons too?  Well all the work is done on site in sub atomic mater so we account for it at the point of radiation not in space where photons have no effect on other photons.  Then we account for the transmission  and interference where the material detectors lie as various kinds of photons strike the same detection panel made of mater.  This makes white light made of the ROYGBIV spectrum composing white light a form of interference between various kinds of photons at the site of detection.  It is really simple then to have a separate conservation of energy and photons then.  photons have no energy until they are reabsorbed / re-emitted any possible distance away from the source so in space they do not get counted in the material conservation of energy leger but they get counted as photon conservation over up to an infinite distance from 14 billion light years away.  Yes I delight in the idea then that there is no Doppler effect on photons and that is all due to refraction and diffraction as light passes though substance areas of space if it does actually suggest objects are moving away from each other? 

Conservation of mass remains intact and energy then even in nuclear action of fusion and fission where but photon conservation is separate ...a different accounting leger.

At the point where a high tension power cable's atoms vibrate as resistance heated that is their energy level in the conservation of energy.  The photons that are of infrared can be counted only if they have some greenhouse effect immediately in the atmosphere except that leads to new radiation of new photons to take their place in delayed fashion.  It helps destroy greenhouse gas global warming theology just as expected.  My suggestion then are no big idea and fully empirical  not just some deduction and inferences..




Monday, December 7, 2015

photon inspiration ....classical physics gone for ever.

figured out what if photons are just code and do not actually transmit energy that they do what I previously discovered.  change the shape of space by changing the face of mater.  That old experiment showing the thin metal film in a vacuum exposed to intense light moving away from the light as the famous force of light experiment is completely misinterpreted.  that is because they held that light exerted a forward force.  but I just said it is sleeping energy activated and my new word for that is "inspired" by the photons.  So what is really happening is the photons are causing thrust essentially in the metal in the vacuum which is not so amazingly then moving the metal forward.  That is already in my new laws of physics published 20 some years ago but I did not fully understand it now I am beginning to do so.  I have to triple and quadruple check and test it now before publishing it more than already on facebook  but it necessarily amazingly has to be true.  So as I already wrote on facebook....it influences (inspires) what Einstein called space time so if you are looking for space time to appear in space it is photons doing it.  And now I understand maybe why the atmosphere can become opaque to gamma rays from space....and that is because the radio waves that are more prevalent in the atmosphere can have the outermost  electrons propelled by the angular momentum code of  radio photons to distances of more than 1000 ft. meaning a gas has properties that have not been properly understood before even with cathode ray evidence. so the concept of photon inspiration is born and that completely Donald trumps string theory which is irrational and a bad analogy.

Photon Inpiration explained and how space -time is shaped by photon inspiration.

https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=3124579903519458995#editor/target=post;postID=6060448688701847029;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=0;src=postname

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

We checked. Water above the dam is the same as water below the dam.

So what is the difference between water above and below a dam.  water above the dam has energy in it to  power the turbines below the dam but water below does not have the same potential energy . so we checked to be sure. we bottled water below the dam and brought it up to the top of the dam and it was the same as water on top of the dam and we took water from the top of the dam and it was identical to water at the bottom of the dam.  No difference .  The water was exactly the same.  So how is it that water has potential energy on top of the dam and where is the energy stored that will power the turbines?    That is a proof that suggests the idea that energy is just expression of a code transmitted when a photon is involved in adding work of energy to a material system. It really suggests that the coding added to the water is just it's higher elevation above the turbines at the dam verses the spent water below the dam.  The water was energized to become humidity that rained down the landscape above the dam because of solar energy out in the ocean.  It only lifted it to a higher elevation giving it potential energy otherwise completely identical to water below the dam at a lower elevation.  That says mater can have added potential energy without having to express it and that a photon can bring it a code that energizes it. strictly as a code and not a transmission of actual energy. It means that the energy may already be stored completely in mater and as seems likely now, photons do  not impart energy at all but just a code that activates mater with it's inherent already existing energy.  Newton says an object in motion will stay in motion or at rest will remain at rest as a law of nature as inertia.  That apparently may not be correct for atoms and sub atomic particles which can become more and less active even go to sleep before angular momentum code is transmitted to them from afar. crazy theory except that the radiometer proof from my original new laws of physics completely supports that notion.  Light hits the radiometer and does not impart momentum as I discovered because photons do not have mass but photons do activate the surface of mater the longer they are absorbed and held by mater. Sure mater reacts with mater to release and /or to capture and retain energy but that is not how photons behave.  photons can cause your skin to burn sunbathing and looking at the sun can burn out your eyes very quickly and permanently make you blind. That still does not say that the energy comes from space on the backs of the photons delivering it.  Instead it seems code that unlocks energy already in the material interface of mater is how it really works.  Our concept of energy may need to be changed when it comes to photons and subatomic particles reacting.  The analogy of water above and below the dam say it all.  The only thing that makes water different is the elevation being over the turbines such that it can fall though them causing them to spin.  Water going though the turbines might warm up slightly as a result from there being some friction involved. Water loses no energy.  it can repeat the exact same thing at a lower dam on the same river where it falls once again causing a turbine to spin generating electricity.  The angular momentum relayed to electrons from the generator to create the electric current is strictly coding expressing itself at the electron level maybe and the energy released is just inherently already in the electrons as it is in photons.

Amazing New Physics Discovery: Photons Are Nothing but Code. Code? Yes Code. Symbolic Code. My proof shows they have no "energy" and few if any types of dimensionality until they interact with mater.

I just figured out what photons really are.  At least I clarified the definition.  They are just code.  Coded imprints of angular momentum.  Photons absolutely do not exist until mater collides with them so there is no energy in transition at least none that can be measured or sensed until the code is received.  Hey we do the same thing with radio waves, light pulses , microwave radiation pulses.  So photons do have properties as a rather symbolic code more than being energy . Yes they can impart energy but not until mater is also involved which does mean they are code and a coding mechanism .  I rather think exclusively so.  (I am still figuring it out though)  So when we get radiation we are seeing code being sent out from a material source and this code imprints the angular momentum of mater principally atoms and their component parts. The imprinted code radiates out and will not interact with other photons in space but it will if absorbed for any length of time, including what is called reflection and then re-emitted as the reflection code.  Code , Code. Code.  It is that simple. Now mater is not coded it reacts to code where the code interacts but not where it does not across the spectrum and the periodic table with a lot of variability when it comes to cause and effect.
 So the photon code is the cause and the effects are in mater.  physical material mater without photons is code free or has pre-existing photon codes established and retained even fossilized and new code can change it's state but lacking new code its state cannot change unless the mater itself is interacting then it already has been coded to do so. That changes the definition of what photons are and makes more sense of them as transponders over time and space (distance) of the angular momentum of mater (atoms and sub atomic particles therein.  That means the code is massless.  No mass  and no wave because it is the mater that reacts to the retained angular momentum imprint of the photon so that the wave analogy applies to the mater with the importation of that angular momentum code signal and not having anything to do with the "symbolism" of the photon coding.  Now you go back to the Young double slit experiment and what is observed with interference is mater having code interfere with code at that level of the surface of the mater reflecting code. (light)  Now take this code not as an analogy but as factual reality and think of my multi variable probability theory of cosmic reality and my theory that angular momentum imprinting is what causes an electric current and voila.  New  physics. Improved physics.  one more point to make:  mater itself can be coded but it is not a code till it reaches the level of something like DNA.  Mater can become building blocks for code but it has actual variablility of actual angular momentum not just a symbolic derivative as a sort of imprint that photons have.  Thus electrons probably are  totally massless and kind of a code receptor as a current channels imprinted angular momentum though electrons that have imprinted in a different but similar manner. 
Photons are highly abstract symbolic code which is 1. why they can never react with each other in space or even with a laser concentrating them.  2 which is why they can act over billions of light years and still retain the same electro magnetic equivalence as if they traveled just for a few seconds or less.

Now that I know photons are schematic code only it changes everything. If you don't get what I just actually discovered you won't understand what that does to the cosmos nor what radiation being spherical really is about. I actually don't know yet. I now have simplified the observations to get rid of the wave and particle analogy nonsense successfully. code does that. What I don't know is why or how. Some could say God coded it all and transmits it. Other says were a big computer program run by God or we are a projection from some central intelligence somewhere. Not my theory. I don't need central authority for multi variable conditional probability but it is quite a surprise to find out that photons are coding transponders. As for the code being a message I am not saying that either. The only message sent by code is the angular momentum of mater origin of the photon that can re-energize far away atoms as much as what originally imprinted them as code. The idea that energy has to e sent to become energy is unnecessary.

Now with this new proof showing that photons are really nothing other than a transmission code, a symbolic transmission code for the angular momentum of atomic particles. I can re define gravity and magnetism in a whole new way, it not obvious to you already, and get answers to questions about both magnetism and gravity that no one could solve before.  perhaps you think you already figured it out?  Nope.  I have but have to think it all though before I reveal it.

It might bother you that I am calling photons symbolic code because that seems anthropomorphic.  However that is not my intent. it is not an analogy but an actual observation that is completely empirical.  I only mean to say it is a code that atoms/ atomic particles with mass  or their electrons react to , if they can and do.  There is nothing more to explain except the implications of the obvious and there are definitely some other new laws of physics coming.  The law of photon symbolism is added now to the basic tenants of Newton.  I maybe able to surpass Newton soon.  watch and see.