Survival of the fittest/ reproducting and fixing probability .

I am still trying to find a mathematic proof to explain why life desires to survive and to reproduce in a uncaring universe.  The t whole idea behind

Darwin's theory of evolution  is that the urge to survive and to reproduce is some innate sense of nature.  animals with instinct more than consciousness or bacterial size life forms all exhibit adaptations for survival and for successful reproduction. so do plants but plants get strange when they require animal species like bees to pollinate for them.  The phonic code mostly originating from the sun is responsible for life as we know it.  I say code since the discovery that photons don't actually transmit energy though time and space....they merely send code that finds the energy as dark momentum of motion of everything where it is intercepted by mater that can read that part of the photon (code) spectrum.  To find the answer I go back to the multi variable probability thesis for my theory of everything in the cosmos.  Life by trying to survive and reproduce is actually mathematically trying to fix probability and its outcomes.  Finally I am on to the answer to the problem. I actually do mean fixing the odds.  that is exactly what Darwinism is about.  fixing the odds for survival and for reproduction.  But that's all pretty arbitrary.  having the odds favor one life form over another does not explain the need and desire for organisms including plants to survive and do more than thrive if possible.  I already mathematically determined that those who pray to God are also trying to fix probability so it can benefit them and their interests. fixing the odds for being favorable to a species explains some of the how but none of the why.  it maybe we have to think of the biosphere as on a different than human time scale and that we are just part of the slime that is in interactive mode where our thousands of years in existence are merely a few second for outside observers. In that perspective were just part of the geophysical process creating vast sedimentary layers of what we leave behind in millions and billions of years. 

so it has to come down to probability and making probability predictable.

Remodeling The Universe taking into account underlying momentum of everything.

I always wondered if there was some identifying feature of water above a dam or a water fall that made it different than water below the dam or water fall.  Scientists can take samples above and below and find its just water in both places.  Ok there maybe slightly less atmospheric pressure weighing on the water above than below.  Other differences  are slightly less density above the dam than below.  Very slight that is.  Energy potential of falling  above the dam  is the same as below that is if another dam or water fall lies below the first level.  Water above the dam is basically equivalent to water below until that is it finds itself in motion falling over the edge or down into a channel hosting a turbine.  You can then say that momentum potential is X above the dam and unknown at best below the dam from zero to whatever.  Lets then pivot to whole galaxies.  Spiral arms of galaxies apparently collapsing into the center  where black holes are now widely believed to occupy are then momentum potential zones like the water above the dam.  Nigel Calder wrote that book about our violent universe I read so long ago.  Everything is ready to collide and blow up out there in the cosmos. Most of what we can see because of the light spectrum is all about stuff that has violent  stuff happening to it or is collapsing , colliding or just blowing up.  We see the hot spots after momentum has gone over the edge so to speak over the falls or into the turbines running the generators.

Momentum mapping the  universe then we might see it as many bubbles growing and colliding with each other and we map out the interactions from what we can observe thanks to photons recording these incidents.  If you then want to find dark energy it is clearly then the parts of the material cosmos that have not yet collided and remain invisible till they do.  Active zones then are momentum collision areas .  Two fields can intercept each other causing a ripple effect or a wave of momentum collisions that fans out or is generated like  a wave.  So maybe the galaxies  and other features in the cosmos are  actually just the hot zone of interaction and everything else we don't see Is that pure momentum unrealized we know resides in water above the dam or waterfall.  That remodeling was fairly simple . Its dynamism is for the liminal active area to move though dull lifeless areas of the cosmos till the momentum collision happens when it does.  Then to see all the photons observed as code that reveals it take me some more thought to know what that does for the theory.

Unintelligent Darwinism

First of all I am in complete agreement with Darwin's theory of evolution. We even now know how it works thanks to understanding the DNA molecule. Getting that out of the way I can now talk about intelligent design.  Bunk.  Complete bunk but as for unintelligent Darwinism  I can tell you that the theory of evolution does not sufficiently explain questions of why.  I know science is fine and well dealing with how things work and that the why question really might not mater most of the time.  Why thing work the way they do implies that there is underlining intelligence making things happen.  To ask why something happens or works in nature the way it does assumes some underlining intelligence or even a creator.  We as criminals why they committed a crime.  That does not mean we have to accept their explanations.  Most criminals just enjoyed committing crimes and know that admitting that is not in their best interest when the legal system is inquiring.   "The murder was fun I enjoyed it." is what most of them would save if they felt being honest was something criminals do.  In ancient Rome Emperors were ever so happy to admit that they enjoyed committing their crimes in public. No tribunal was going to judge a living god.   The process of evolution obviously leads to more adept species more able to survive in nature than their forbearers.  The process of evolution does indeed lead to more adept survival skills and overall survival of species.  Evolution actually does improve physiology and even mental capacity of species for survival.  Evolution works because species seem to want to survive and reproduce and that reproduction furthers the benefits of evolution.  That's HOW but not WHY! 

If we ask any species why it wants to survive and reproduce or survive to reproduce the best answers would seem to come from humans of course .  Why?   Lots of rationalizations and like the criminal murderer humans best answer is "I want to survive and reproduce prolifically because it is fun." Difficulty surviving like suffering from starvation or disease is not fun.   Unfortunately those of us who are convinced that nature is completely indifferent about what happens in nature including with us humans then have to wonder why should the benefits of evolution even mater?  why does survival of species and /or successful prolific reproduction even mater ?  I suppose it might be all about God being pure probability.  "Anything is possible with God."  Betterment of species though successful reproduction, successful survival and evolution over time is not just some random probability it almost seems as if it should be a conscious process even for single cell micro organisms including plants.  So life is a complex chemicals reaction that once started wants to evolve to be a more complex set of chemical reactions that aims for better survival and more prolific reproduction making super species with super physiology to thrive in the real existing environment and even sometimes to alter the environment for their own benefit via evolutionary process. Well that sounds way too intelligent to be just something that happens with a spark of lightening or static electricity to be unintended , undesired and the product of an uncaring universe?


Am I finding God in the details?  No.  Though I now believe if there is a God he has to be pure probability which is what this chain of articles is all about in this blog.   Research I am doing in the nature of photons and electro magnetic disturbances from which they come from in mater has led me to understand that the universe does have more intelligence than we give it credit for.  We can see that the way crystals grow.  In real natural Chrystal growth more than one kind of crystal can grow in the same place . We find inclusions of one crystal that grew simultaneously in another.  Some how or other with valences of atoms those atoms were able to communicate to other atoms how to fall into place and find lower energy levels with higher energy bonds to keep them together.  If you look at a piece of granite the three major constituent minerals that are crystalized in it know how to separate and from their own interlocking structures in the whole rock mass.  That's because photons don't carry energy but transmit code and the same is true of electromagnetic disturbances from which the photons are derived. There is semantics and communications going on.  We know of dna cell receptors and they also communicate with atoms and molecules around them. Cells organize all sorts of molecules  in just the right ways to further their interests of survival and of reproduction for survival.   The dna itself is a communications device . Just one at a higher level than the subatomic semantics code of photons and electro magnetism of sub atomic particles.   With all thing being guided by probability  some form of basic intelligence via communications of photons and electro magnetism is part of that probability.

In animal species going back to Darwin's discoveries we find that one species can fill in for anther species with the purpose of being a certain kind of predator in the food chain. Where say cat species are lacking some rodent can evolve into a predator that is acts the same way consuming the same diets as cats .  Owls are predatory birds that may have evolved from non predatory plant eating birds over millions of years? Just because their food might over populate without predators around  is not unintelligent.  First there is a food source that is untapped to begin with and then the evolutionary development happens over time  because of species resourcefulness.  Too intelligent for being completely random ?    That is why a greater intelligence in the cosmos would seem to solve the problem of Why evolve at all just to be more successful at surviving to be more successful at reproducing.  The grandly intelligent ecologists believe that nature wants or need to regulate over population of lower food chain species and that there is a great chain of being where no element can be touched or the entire system of ecology unravels.  That's far more intelligence than the blind reality of nature and that's the reason environmentalism is absurd and unscientific. Nature is as happy with imbalance and with balance and that concept is just yin and yang analogy pushed on something entirely indifferent to any probable event. 

So where is the intelligence. It is in the spectrum of photons and in the periodic table and evolved into the double helix structures of dna.  DNA is a relentless self replication machine but it can do just fine with huge masses of single cell organism.  What reason does it have to evolve millions of variant species then?  None that would be intelligent?  but maybe.

So you say show me an empirical experiment that  proves there is intelligence in the cosmos.  A lot of people would say . "I just read what you wrote and this is what I think about it."   That is the transmission of a message with semantics and code that I used to transmit it with.   Then there is a better experiment you already know about.  You can make a hole in a microwave oven door and microwaves will be detected coming out the door from the source of the radiation with in.  But a thin aluminum perforated skin over the open door of the microwave and no microwaves will escape.  Everything is coded. If your instrument that detects microwaves is functioning you either will know microwaves are there or not.  Get rose colored glasses put the glasses on and you see pink.  The glasses are sorting out the photons that are not pink and absorbing more of those than otherwise though maybe not all because you see more colors than just pink.  The old theory said the pink you were seeing was transmitting energy to your eye's retinas.  there your brain can read the incoming code.  having found that no energy is actually being transmitted though space to get to the rose colored glasses and that the apparent energy comes from the materials the glass is made of itself mostly via underlying momentum already possessed by the atoms that make up the glass because they are traveling though the universe relative to some  non moving point somewhere at a tremendous velocity.  Then the photons as mere code are just communicating. sun light then is not feeding the surface of the biosphere with energy but just actually finding a code to release energy already there and waiting .  The coding then influences the probable outcomes and it would seem they are communicating intelligence of being.  The sun then is making much of life on earth flourish survive and multiply. 

Take the basic carbon quiz to find out how to save the world from climate change/ global warming theology.

Take the Atmospheric Carbon Quiz? See How Smart You Are. So You Say You Believe In Global Warming ? OK Lets See What You Really know.

Take the Atmospheric Carbon Quiz? See How Smart You Are You Say You Believe in Global Warming ? OK, Take the Quiz and Find Out What You Really Know About Carbon Dioxide in the Earth's Atmosphere. Get All Questions Right and Win a Noble Peace Prize Lex Loeb Contributor Network . This is exercises is not about global warming or climate change. It is about basic scientific facts about earth's atmosphere. The quiz is really simple and multiple choice. Just pick the best choice per question and then go to the end of the article to see the correct answers. You must get all of the answers right to win a Nobel peace prize otherwise you fail the quiz. If you fail the quiz then you might want to brush up on your science studies. These questions are multiple choice. Pick the answer to each question that is closest to the scientific fact or to estimated and abbreviated numbers: . . . . . . . . . . . . The Atmospheric Carbon Quiz: Question 1: Most of the volume of air is made of what? (A) Carbon Dioxide. (B) Oxygen. (C) Pollution. (D) Empty Space. Question 2: How much gas is in earth's air around sea level compared to an equal volume of liquid water? (A) 5 percent (B) Half (C) 1/800th (D) none Question 3: Approximately how much does a cubic foot of air weigh at sea level on earth? (A) 1/2 pound (B) 0.10 pounds (C) One ATM (D) 0.075 pounds Question 4: Which weighs more? Hot air or Cold air? A. Cold Air B. Hot Air C. Both weigh the same amount. 5. What is the most prevalent gas in the atmosphere? (A) Oxygen. (B) Carbon Monoxide (C) Carbon Dioxide (D) Nitrogen (E) Xenon (F) Methane 6. What percentage of The Earth's atmosphere in parts per million per dry volume is Carbon dioxide? (A) 20.95 % (B) 78.08 % (C) 4.0 % (D) 0.00005 % (E) 0.0387% 7. What percentage of the earth's atmosphere ,in parts per million, is 10,000 parts per million of Carbon Dioxide (enough to start being toxic to people an animals)? (A) 50% (B) 1% (C) 0.05% (D) 10% (E) 37.7% 8. Which Gas constituent atom has the greatest relative atomic mass? (A) Carbon. (B) Nitrogen. (C) Oxygen. 9. Does Carbon Dioxide in earth's atmosphere React in normal earth conditions with other gases or water vapor in the atmosphere or act as a catalyst? (A) yes. (B) no it is generally very stable as a gas molecule. 10. At the present levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and all other carbon gases put together which best describes the concentration in parts per 10,000 per volume? (A) 1 in ten thousand parts (B) more than 279 in ten thousand parts (C) 12 in ten thousand parts (D) less than 4 in ten thousand parts 11. If the amount of Carbon doubles in the atmosphere in the next 50 years because of out of control industrial growth what would be the maximum amount of carbon in the atmosphere in parts per million per volume? (A)10,000 parts per million per volume (B)90,000 parts per million per volume (C)776 parts per million per volume (D)3000 parts per million per volume. 13. Are there renegade scientists who believe that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is getting dangerously low to support the earth's photosynthetic plant life on land because prehistoric times had much much larger amounts of atmospheric and dissolved carbon in the oceans? (A) Yes (B) No 14. Is it possible for gases to escape from frozen ice or to enter frozen ice the way old mildew tasting ice from your home refrigerator freezer tastes when left in the freezer too long? (A) Yes (B) No 15. Is it possible for a gas to suck up heat from the atmosphere and discharge the heat into the cold night air or up at higher elevations into outer space sort of the way an air conditioner cooler works by retaining the heat long enough to transfer it away from hotter areas? Is methane a heat sink gas that can be used in cooling systems? (A) Yes (B) No 16. What happens when a gas is heated? (A) It rises (B) It gains kinetic energy and moves at a more rapid speed in the atmosphere. (C) most gases with possible exception of water vapor clouds that have dust seeds tend to take an amorphous diffusion though the atmosphere. (D) All of the above. 17. How does a gas in the atmosphere make objects on the ground and the surface of the ocean hot? (A) They bump into those objects transferring kinetic energy of motion. (B) They radiate infrared and other types of electromagnetic waves into empty space that get absorbed by material objects that retain that heat energy. (C) It really does not mater how much heat is retained by the relatively rarefied gases in the atmosphere because the sun rays hitting the physical surface of earth is many times more efficient as direct exposure. This direct exposure makes surfaces hotter than secondary re-radiation of solar energy from gases in the atmosphere. (D)There is evidence that the earth's surface warms the atmosphere perhaps more efficiently than a relatively diffuse atmosphere can warm the earth's surface. (E) All or any of the above. 18. If it were true that Mars could be made habitable for life from earth by pumping carbon dioxide and other gases into it's diffuse existing atmosphere would that atmosphere need to have more atmospheric pressure than the earth's to be effective especially if Mars does not have sufficient ocean equivalents of surface liquid water? (A) Yes (B) No 19. Which of the following conditions will make an actual greenhouse with flowers growing in side of it cooler? (A) painting the floor of the greenhouse black. (B) Sealing the greenhouse so out door air can't get in. (C)taking the windows out so the open atmosphere and pumping in carbon dioxide to replace the effects of the window panes. (D) increasing the sun's exposure on the greenhouse by having mirrors around it reflect more light in. 20. Scientists say that if you have a methane gas stove in your kitchen and no way to light the gas so it burns you can still cook with it if you expose it to sun light because methane gas can absorb 22-25 times the energy of carbon dioxide exposed to solar energy and retain it longer. (A) True (B) False 21. Polar bears survived the ice age and as a consequence they also survived the greatest melting of ice in the last 30-40 thousand years. (A) True (B) False 22. If a group of scientists predict that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is going to cause temperatures to rise on earth and data is collected that shows their thesis may be wrong, which of these answers should they not be. (A) A bit skeptical of their hypothesis and their conclusions. (B) somewhat skeptical (C) Angry that the data does not conform to their advanced training and logic. (D) Feeling like they may have made a mistake or entered some wrong assumptions in the way they generated the original thesis. 23. The ancient Maya thought that if they sacrificed human being to gods that control the weather and ate parts of their sacrificial victims that they would get more than enough rain needed to grow luxuriant crops needed to maintain large populations. If the Maya were right about the world ending in 2012 then they must have been good at predicting the weather with the magic of human sacrifice rituals? (A) True (B) False 24. In the prehistoric times sea levels on earth have been as much as 300 to 500 ft higher than they are today and 300 to 500 feet lower than they are today? (A) true (B) false _____________________________________________________________________________ Answers: (warning you are the genius tell me if I have a typo or got any wrong )use these answers to cheat with if necessary: 1=D 2=C 3=D 4=A 5=D 6=E 7=B 8=B 9=B 10=D 11=C 12=unlucky 13=A 14=A 15=A 16=D 17=E 18=A 19=D 20=B 21=A 22=C 23=B 24=A . Close

Physicists have been fudging their numbers for years not accounting for the huge amount of energy that is released if say two planets collide .

The people at Cern are concerned with momentum but not  momentum that underlies existence.  The Cern complex is traveling though the universe at very high speed measured in thousands if not hundreds of thousands of meters per second.  It is traveling as fast as Switzerland is and the Alps. If some Asteroid suddenly appears the size of manhattan with a depth of a couple of miles  and strikes the earth at high velocity . It has the force of both the movement of the earth and the asteroid combined..  That can be lethal to at least most of the surface of the earth.  Out in space on both the asteroid and the earth before they collide its just like here on earth. we hardly feel like the planet is moving. We have no sensation that the earth is moving. Same is true on the asteroid.  They don't start to feel each other's influence till close enough that gravity between the two causes some tidal effects that quikly increase as the two get closer into their collision. Then when they come together part of the earth just vaporizes as does most of the asteroid  that just hit it.  The combined effect of the explosion on impact is greater than 1000s of nuclear bombs all going off at once.  So there you have instant dark energy.  That water above the dam that will eventually fall and cause the generator turbines to spin looks just like water below the dam with that energy left out.  potential energy above the dam is real but there is actually no test with out letting it fall to the turbines to detect it.  The water molecules don't behave any different above or below the dam. surface tension is the same, density of the liquid is the same.  in the cosmos the energy of motion gets to be astronomical everything is moving.  Some percentage of everything will eventually collide. Chances are that virtually everything that can be seen in the distant universe because of light is a product of some collision.  That's light energy because if is after a collision.  before the collisions it is dark energy.

Dark Mater is Just cosmic momentum and photons are the code that can instantly put a stop or near stop to that momentum....leads to a new momentum frames of reference relativity. Remember the young double slit experiment is an illusion.

These physicists really don't get it. Can't get it. I am slowly figuring it all out, my latest is to confirm frequency and wavelength dynamics of photons in space by placing detectors everywhere in the space to confirm the existence and all I get is shadows form them. curvature of space because of frame of reference at a distance makes one wonder exactly where the observer is standing to make the observation. being a frame of reference then from a different view point then... there still is no curvature of space or space time. and the photons make straight lines from their own perspective but then who rides a photon to observe them? The clencher is to suddenly realize that everything in space is moving and thus has to have good old fashioned Newtonian / pre Newtonian momentum. Turns out photons actually stop subatomic particles in their spots or slow them down dramatically . The more the photon slows the subatomic "object" and stops it the more forceful is the reaction to the onward moving mass with the existing momentum. That delivers the frequency going to that of a gamma ray that codes for a nearly complete stop. I have not quite figured our the wavelength that derives from that per each photon on the spectrum...not yet getting closer and closer though and soon I will be the only person in this part of the galaxy / universe to know it. What happens is as an electron is slowed or stopped it seems to be activated and flies out the back window as if in a moving car breaking that car window because it suddenly stops or nearly does when the car keeps moving foreward.. I got that part the wavelength has something to do with how the window breaks and angular momentum. It is like a two ball transmission system I invented to simplify gear shifts some years ago ...well maybe? That quiet unseen momentum everything has moving at the speed of the galaxy and the part of the universe where our galaxy is moving is the dark energy that these people are seeking . I figured that out and a whole new relativity . Angular momentum and gravity being Hot has everything to do with gravity ...so we can now link magnetism with the electromagnetic disturbances that give us the waves and frequencies observed in the old science. Its starting to make too much sense. This makes no sense unless you realize that the reason they read that photons become 30 percent heavier than electrons is just because of the momentum as dark energy and photons as code that instantly puts a stop to momentum where it interacts. I figured it out . they probably will never will.
See More

Einstein's Impossible Point of View Frame of Reference.

Ok . I am standing on the shoreline watching a ship go by and I see a rock falling from a mast to the floor of the ship.  I am pretty much standing still verses the ship being on shore.  I  see the rock falling in what is an arc as the ship moves forward. On board the ship my video cam shows the rock falling straight down. Both points of view are true and real.   OK.   But then there is Einstein's thought experiment with the rocket or the elevator and laser light going from one wall to the other perpendicular to the acceleration of the elevator or the rocket ship.  Where am I able to stand still and observe that?  Ok so skipping ahead I guess I go out and look for black holes?  Even so my stationary point of view is impossible except as that mental experiment. I have undone this problem in the past with the simple observation that space has no built in metrics  . Einstein ultimately makes the speed of light as a constant in a vacuum the metric of space and time.    That is especially an impossible metric point of view certainly because light can only be assumed to be  in existence between two objects where as it actually might not be.  That's the box with the cat that is both dead and living at the same time.  I am not saying the speed of light has not bee measured accurately or observed but I am saying that the observation with light gets tricky where you are at a distance observing a flash of light on one wall of a space ship coming from the other.   We can test the theory by repeating an experiment with light multiple times and we know the probability of sending light where we direct it so long as there is a detector a reflector for our distance observation.

Photons "feed" on momentum that an object in motion is not even aware it has. No energy is transmited though space via a photon . It is just code.

If I had magic powers to do this.....A car moving at 65 mph has a bowling ball in the front seat. The car stops suddenly and the bowling ball flies though the windshield because it had no seat belt. No magic required for that one . But what if I want to make the bowling ball in the front seat fly out the back window as the car is moving? That's where I need the special magic. I stop the ball with the momentum it has in the car running forward and not stopping at 65 mph.... If I can stop the bowling ball it will seem to fly out the window and then drop to the ground probably rolling in the same direction slowly as the car because it hit the back window to escape. How do I stop the bowling ball independently of the moving car? Possibly I can do it with a very high powered laser because photons can do this to sub atomic particles. I don't think any physicists out there will agree with me but I am 100 percent correct. Photons actually slow down sub atomic particles they intercept and the degree to which they slow down is based on the frequency and wave properties along the entire EM spectrum. It is an Einstein Relativity killer . That's because photons have no mass and that's because the whole story includes space and time and the frames of reference physics. The thing about subatomic particles including electrons is they have set set charges and set connections which is why this effect results in changes in angular momentum. In terms of time and space it would seem that photons can slow parts mater down just like the bowling ball that is in relationship to the motion of the car carrying it. I might be able to perform a laser experiment with something much more massive than an electron to show it is true. I can already do it with electrons. If I can do it with a bowling ball I could create a source of energy that has nearly infinite availability except that it takes substantial energy to generate enough photons to apply it and you do much more physical work than what you net in photon energy equivalence.

Finally an alien bowling ball explantion for how exactly photons slow down mater as code without mass and without energy in transmission.

You have to read the blog from the beginning and the other Lex Loeb blogs to fully understand the new physics.  I think the last post left something to be desired or several things.  This is how you understand it in a frames of reference, new relativity perspective (it is new because it was a false assumption of the time that photons had mass.  what photons have is the ability to have an analogy in the thought process and an effect as mass but actually have no mass and are only code.)  I keep pushing that because I have the proof for it in empirical findings.   The question then is if that is true how it is that the code works at the subatomic level.  I was saying it changed angular momentum which is of course correct but it still desires more of an explanation.  The source of the energy the code relies on for mater to act upon being exposed to photons has been explained from coming from "dark energy" of momentum of mater.  that is to say mater moving with an entire galaxy say at a speed of say 60,000 meters per second against the background of space of other galaxies,  though I have explained that space has no metrics at all inherit in it,  then that 'dark energy' is the momentum of the objects in the galaxy that don't reveal themselves as having energy till they collide with either a stationary or a different moving toward it to create fireworks on impact. That is the energy tapped by the photons that have neither  mass nor energy in transit through space.  

How does the photon as code interact? If the code magically tells the subatomic particle it interacts with to tap energy than the momentum of that sub atomic particle has to decrease.   That is the same as slowing it down in one sense verses the velocity of everything else in its immediate vicinity as part of a material object.  How so?   The aliens more simply explain it as should be with a frames of reference analogy:  your car is moving at 65 miles per hour. you slam on the brakes and skid a bit and the car comes to a complete stop. you suddenly have no velocity and no momentum.  Ok you have the same car do the same thing and you have a bowling ball in the front seat and you stop suddenly and the bowling ball flies though the front window of the car because you had not put a seat belt around it.  Ok now instead you have some magical coding sent to the bowling ball resting in the front seat of your car moving at 65 mph. The code sent to the bowling ball tells it to have zero momentum.  The bowling ball does what the code says and it slows down to a stop suddenly while the car is still moving at a constant 65 mph .  The  bowling ball in various frames of reference is seen flying out the back window of the car at 65 mph.  An observer in the car see it fly though the window and people on the side walk are in danger seeing it coming out the window but not really flying towards them, 

This explains why gamma rays have a punch like they do at that highest energy level/ side of the spectrum.  It is not mass causing the subatomic destruction then of gamma rays.  Since all electrons have exactly the same charge that's where the angular momentum comes in because the shock of the photon bowling ball magic code change level of angular momentum meaning they just get dragged back to the nucleus  orbits after  this happens .


the code that takes energy out of the bank of momentum objects has can  create projectiles as the rest of the galaxy and mater keeps moving verses what slows down  because of hitting the brakes.

Error in new phsycis of photons ,

I misspoke when I said that photons don't have properties of waves or frequencies.  That is not how I should have said it if I did.  The correction is that they do have properties of waves and of frequencies but only in conjunction with mater and that is highly variable across the periodic table.  Detection of photons is not universal with all material substances.  It is true that photons have no mass and transmit no energy and are merely code. That part is correct.  The code interacts with energy already possessed by intercepting mater that can react to the photons as coded and the coding of course is by frequency and wave metrics .  I only mean to say that in empty space photons have no attributes of waves or of frequencies . I assume they actually travel in straight lines. That could change with more research.

where the energy apparent comes from when photons interact with mater is from the "dark energy" of momentum which is to say that they are code traveling at the speed of light in a vacuum and interact with mater which is always certainly in motion.  everything in the galaxy we live in is moving at some speed verses the rest of stuff out in space away from the galaxy.  The velocity of everything in the galaxy could be 60,000 meters per second. We don't even notice till we crash into some other galaxy moving at some velocity and some parts vaporize on impact  That is the reservoir that photons interact with to release energy.  That same energy of momentum from centrifugal  forces / angular momentum can lead to the high density mater from which we derive nuclear energy too.  That has to be the source of the energy released by photon coding.  It could have a nuclear effect in a super high speed collision which is probably the real source of all super novaea .

I do now have the proof of this origin of photon coding for resourcing dark momentum energy from the black body radiation effect and from the radiometer proof I published years ago.  as photons do not impart momentum they have no mass.  a reflected photon is first absorbed and then re-emitted as the reflection some tiny amount of infrared could be retained in the material mirror interface to radiate out anywhere from that body later. that photon energy is essentially 'red shifted' toward infrared. The speed at which reflection happens is something to be concerned about because it does not necessarily have to be instanteous although all of our mirrors are.  again that is the retention of the infrared code that later comes off . When a visible light spectrum photon is reflected it imparts no force on the reflective surface because the incoming energy  has to equal the outgoing energy minus that attributed to the infrared retained for radiation later.  Now when a black surface absorbs radiation and does not reflect it much more visible light gets converted to kinetic heat energy in the atoms later to radiate out as infrared photons.  There the impact is a net positive with the code and it sends out electrons in the direction form which the photons came. that opens the doors to the statistical probability that electrons from within the mater can fill the void opened  shifting and actually slowing down that dark energy of momentum by some tiny amount . The reflective surface is a wash.  This is not what moves the radiometer vanes in the ones with rarified gas contents but it does show the process and nails down the properties of photons as not having any mass and not transmitting any energy though space.........The hot black electron excited surface has a negative charge to interact with the electrons on the rarrified gases.  pretty simple .  The trick to understanding it is understanding that all photons are going to be absorbed before being re-reflected or they are going to be transmutted into different spectral photons in the process before being re-radiated.  all code it seems is eventually re-radiated.  Then we have what looks like a gallon of gasoline. we believe that originated with solar power via photosynthesis so the fossil fuels energy theory begins. It was coding that got that energy packed in with molecular bonding such that gasoline has an enourmous btu potential..The energy that comes out of it is possibly all eventually to become infrared radiation?  maybe so but it is going to move a lot of stuff around when it quickly oxidizes .  lots of momentum and that does not get counted in the conservation of energy budgeting.  The value of the infrared radiation may not be as high as calculated then to reach total conservation of energy balance.

Almost Finally The New Laws Of Physics. Fully Updated and corrected .

I almost have it done.  Photon Radiation, Gravity and Magnetism are all phenomena that work according to the inverse square law....The reason for this   is that none of these have any mass, none transmit energy though space or time, none of these have properties of waves or frequencies. All of them originate in actual sources composed of  mater.   Finally I am no longer as clueless about what is going on ....the errors in the original physics texts are even more obvious than ever.   Inverse square law phenomena are transmitting code not mass or energy.  Ever wonder why atoms shed infrared and other photons instead of retaining them longer term?  It is because they have no need for retention.   Objects that were hot have shed infrared photons and they may have since cooled.  Energy states of mater actually tend to some less active state while at the same time they have hidden if not invisible energy that only manifests itself under certain circumstances.  So it seems Newton's basic laws need a updating and revisions.  The latest is published elsewhere already but refining it all is what is still being worked on .

Discounting impossible metrics and looking for a metric of momentum motion and collision avoidance

Still working on the new laws of physics.  That metric shown in illustrations  of warp due to space/time Gravity/ mass  is supposed to be a metric in space. if space is empty though  the metric of distance can't be warped . To demonstrate warping stuff has to be in space and be observed as warping.  The whole relativity thing makes the metric the speed of light and the assumption is made that light has mass and therefore follows the warps with the warped space time out there.  If you learn that photons have no mass than all that metric stuff instantly goes poof.  The only metric then is proximity as per masses in Newtonian gravity and /or  the potential of objects colliding with each other and  releasing significant amounts of energy . So then there is a metric of avoiding collisions.  did not say it right. working on that.  I figured it out last night but kind of lost the thoughts here.  Its about momentum of all objects.  Our solar system is mostly a neat way for a lot of stuff to avoid colliding ,think of it that way.  we blame gravity for most of this avoidance  there in is a metric system?

Converting Rocket Thrust to angular momentum via a fly wheel and vice versa. invisible force verses invisible force?

No doubt about it.  heavy flywheels rotating in a vacuum can  probably be used to brake a rocket or accelterate it .  How to convert invisible momentum to  rotation?  we can take trust and instead of forcing the rocket foreward use it to spin the wheel .  There has to be eqivalence somewhere or somehow.  So lets say we can vaporize the spaceship by hitting a solid wall at 30,000 meters per second forward motion, if instead we had that energy moving the fly wheels or flywheels on the craft even if in opposite directions to counteract any gyroscopic forces and the wall is hit at almost no velocity at all it might also vaporize in the exact same manner.  If there is equivalence .  One phenomenon is completely inivisible to the space travelers onboard the craft.  the  travelers also possess the energy  of their mass moving at 30,000 meters per second also ready in a flash of a collision to completely vaporize.  In the same space craft where all that thrust is used instead to turn flywheels at speeds that use the same amount of energy , possibily more than 30,000 meters per second in the circumference  that can become visible to the travelers?  or maybe not.  first they could never reach out and touch it without vaporizing.  There could be no imbalance in the machine or it would vaporize.  It might even happen that the entire apparatus of the fly wheel becomes invisible as a result of spinning that fast or at least would look like a mirrored surface.  The speed of light or photons reflecting off it would be just like a mirror if the surface was reflective because the speed of light is constant.  the geometry of the wheel would  be the shape of the mirrored surface.

A Bath Tub Full of Water In Space/ Space Ship Rocket Tub.

Talking about Trust .  Energy Force and Photon / Electromagnetic coding ..... Imagine a bath tub full of water in space.   The water in the tub is not going to want to go far from the tub if you open the drain it won't give you much of any thrust.  No gravity for the drain to work .  That's not to say you can't power a space ship in space with Water.   The problem with burning fuel in a space craft and exhausting the fuel is your space craft loses mass and then momentum. The more mass retained with the more energy of  motion driving it forward  if it is actually driven forward as a result of thrust,  the better.  The universe does not come with any metric grid  lines as pictured to show how gravity warps space in the theory of relativity.  To accelerate forward with trust with water you might subject the water to electrolysis, separating it into hydrogen and oxygen and  then using the hydrogen and oxygen for combustion for thrust.  There would be no need to trust that out as exhaust however . in the back of the rocket you might have a series of combustion chambers where those reactions could occur with large pistons that would be forced to the rear of the craft with a reaction within an enclosed chamber so no gas escapes and the water produced in combustion can be reused over and over again in combustion reactions.  To condense the water and bring the piston back with out counter acting the forward motion thrust created these chambers are just placed a distance from the space craft behind it so they can be allowed to quickly cool and condense after each reaction. Other chambers could use methane from sewage water on the craft after letting bacteria  recycle the water. then your space craft will need a surplus of oxygen to begin with for those separate reactions in separate chambers. 

The question then is what really causes the motion forward?  of course I will suggest its coding because no object moving forward is actually going to be aware it has all the added energy of motion until it collides with something  moving or standing still. It is thus dark energy.  There is a possibility instead of moving objects forward in space  or in any direction at all that instead the force of thrust is translated into the motion of fly wheels that subtract from any forward energy with motion energy that is apparent to observe . If you can take the work energy of thrust and apply that to spinning the giant heavy fly wheels on the space craft then there is equivalence in force to subtract from any force forward. what if you could break the space craft to slow it down quickly with the fly wheels by maybe just inverting them in some gyroscopic manner?  Anyway if energy is not apparent  as caused by thrust maybe by making it apparent the space craft can slow down or brake?  What is happening at the atomic level with atoms moving forward with out any sense of distance without some artificial grid imposed?  Thinking out loud here .  So behind the  chambers for combustion thrust there could be a chamber filled with a noble gas like xenon  which cools down to the temperature  of space only to be quickly heated with each combustion reaction in the chambers before it. That too can give trust forward. no mass needs to be lost keep all your water and all your oxygen for the duration of your space trips and have your thrust without any type of exhaust everything being recycled.  Now with theories like Bose Higgs fields maybe motion forward is just some kind of simulation of that field?  I don't really suggest I believe that bose higgs either exists but maybe it can in theory to explain  forward motion in a universe with out metric grid demarkations? 

I suggest that every atom in a foreward moving system or mass is in some way itself  like one of the proposed fly wheels.  the energy is somehow contained with in for what happens in a collision.

If you want proof that photons only transmit code and not energy just look in the mirror.

Look in the mirror what do you see?  A facsimile? Don't be too intellectual.  Your right side is not on your left side it is exactly opposite as point A corresponds to Point A with one eye looking back that the same eye.  A quality mirror just codes photons in the visible spectrum and sends them back as re radiation which is how and why  the image you see of your self can be seen by others at different perspectives.  Call that frames of reference?  What ever interpretations you want to make form it is from reading code essentially.  Our human eyes are adept at reading code .   

ok I am standing at the edge of a black hole and the only thing being sucked in is my imagination.

I am going to flip a coin here.  There.


______________________________________________________________

ok
I know this sounds totally crazy...and it has to.  We humans have fooled are selves that only we have something called consciousness?  well yes we tend to believe that.  With the discovery that photons merely transmit code, have no properties of wavelength, no mass and no properties of either energy being transmitted nor any frequency except in sympathetic harmony with some particular form of mater and all they are is code that influences available energy of mass by modulating angular momentum then consciousness is probably everywhere in the universe.  Ever notice how when a text book seeks to reveal how field lines in the universe get warped to allow for Einstein's theory of gravity  to go from a grid to  a dish? That is only when photons have mass which I am sure they do not.  The field lines actually say that the universe has some metric laid out though out it of regularity.  That's like believing in syncopated Jazz music.  I can't say I believe in music.  Often I wish Music has far fewer motives and much less of the confining order that it does.  When I compose music that way it starts to be hard to do .  Music with no metrics is cacophony.  Those Cartesian grid lines in the physical universe of the geniuses of physics is not how a coded universe would work.  When we observe electromagnetic pillowing with x-ray photos of the Sun we might as well be looking at some form of consciousness?  I see it immediately just because I actually see forms that exist there in nature unlike those Einstein warping field lines in space.  I have no uniform theory that explains or proves it though I can see why the ancients might worship the sun.  If code is the what the radiation we receive from the sun is and it causes photosynthesis well then the code sent from the sun is doing something fairly god like.  could it be conscious?  just because photosynthesis does not seem to be working on mars at the moment does not mean it is not coded where the code works because code relating to the entire periodic table is variable.  I am thinking out loud here.  I might even say the earth is conscious not mother earth and not the idiotic ideal as understood by the sierra club but clearly the earth is being shaped with the help of solar "energy" I mean code.  The planets in the solar system are bathed in code going far out from the center.  Code may even be related to gravity as apparent on each body in the solar system.  my gravity is hot thesis was not originally a code theory but a thermodynamic theory. that is now code of course though don't ask me yet how to correctly redefine it .  I am not dropping analogies of frequency and wavelength either but just putting that on the face of the detectors that work to identify various types of light in the spectrum.  I do immediately drop the use of mass too describe photons because it is lethal to my findings on gravity and coding.

Flip that coin. See if God cares.

You actually think there are just two possible outcomes when you flip a coin?  Ultimate outcomes?  I feel like opening a casino called God's Casino.  Inside I have a super computer with  several thousand slot machines attached to it. People come in with their life savings, fortunes, or just betting money and their lives.  They put the money into the slot machine , all of it except the fee they pay to play because the house takes no commission on any wagers.  It is not cheap to play.  In goes the money and you find out if you live or die, grow your fortune or lose it all.  God decides.  It's God's casino. I suppose when I make it into a movie it could have a new and old testament biblical theme going with separate rooms for Hindu's , Moslem, Buddhists and other religions.  Maybe you are not familiar with some Buddhist temples where they do actually have a sort of gambling  try your luck kind of  thing going on.    As much as religion is wishful thinking it is a gamble and seeking quality probability outcomes seems to be what much prayer , religious inward thinking  and mediation seems to be about.   Not sure how God's casino works?  If God runs it all outcomes can't be glorious but satisfied customers that keep coming back is important so maybe everyone has to be a winner except for those that the computer rightly picks out as wicked and undeserving.  I am not yet working on the screen play.  I do think of such things just because of Einstein talking about God not playing dice with the universe,  What game is he playing?  If he is harvesting souls than God does have a house advantage?  Is God's game Backgammon?

It takes gravity for the Coin to flip and land and end up at rest on some level surface. In the international space station the coin might not ever stop flipping.  Now that I know for certain that photons are code and not transferring energy and that energy that they excite is already in mass possibly the dark energy of motion velocity/ momentum of objects not at rest and remaining that way until interacted with by other material objects  including air and also possibly by the codes coming in the form of  photons . I need to revise definitions of what probability really is.  Before probability was anticipating events happening.  Ok so then there are always photons involved  or dark photons embedded in matter as electro magnetic forces.  So then , and I may not be smart enough to say this with any certainty, but  that means that probability is dictated  or at least ascertainable because of photon coding.   most photons we encounter are due to broken electromagnetic bonds in sub atomic particles. The message is like an analogy of synapses in the brain firing off electro magnetic does from one to the next and back for cross referencing / contemplation or just consciousness.  Code broken then is the only code we intercept meaning that maybe those brain scans actually reveal failed relationships of mater and not what we think they do when we can intercept the code....again it is broken links that produce the radiation.  God's casino then really does have something like a vast super computer underlying our perceptions of reality . Code of electro magnetism is why we can grow regular types of different crystals together and get different results at the same time.  codes tells atoms and molecules how to organize themselves from utter chaos.  Code can then be favorable  or detrimental probability in the works.  Why do certain structures repeat themselves over and over again the  deep universe from her to there somewhere as far as 14 billion light years away?  We are processing code. maybe accidental code of past events of cosmic history going a long way back just to see what might be exactly the same as here very far away. That code intercepted probably has no ability to influence much here except our imagination.  we postulate that we live in a galaxy called the milky way from seeing other galaxies particularly that of Andromeda . We never had any probe go up and prove that the milky way actually looks the way we picture it as a spiral galaxy.  It is from our imagination based on what we see because of photons a vast distance away.

God's Casino with the ultimate slop machine will be a killer movie when I finally come out with it . I am concerned about avoiding creating a new religion. to the extent that I am a science fiction writer like karl marx and l ron hubbard, I don't want to take a theme that could be that of a science fiction movie become that religion.  I revise my religion more simply with conditional probability theory just to say that God is pure probability .  It won't help to actively pray or even believe in God because the phenomenon is that one just has to reach that conclusion realize that probability has blessed them just to have a sense of consciousness  and to be in reality what ever that is and to be receptive to the electromagnetic code.   Just being able to see a prism break white light down into the roygbiv spectrum is to know the code.

Proof that Photons transmit only code and not energy is actually pretty easily done.

Photons appear to only transmit code and not actual energy.  The proof is pretty obvious if you just go back to Newton when he studied dispersion of light by a prism.  Of course we can duplicate that exact study today with much less effort than it took Newton,  The other proof comes from other optical tools including lens of various types and fiber optic cable .    Photons pass though all of these, prisms and lens , fiber optic cable (in the range of visible light spectrum)  Little energy is being transferred to glass, fiber optic cable, prism etc.  Some small percentage may react with the glass appearing to transfer energy but not very much.  I suppose some of the few photons that do interact might be visible as the after glow of infra red from glass or prism.  Most photons, I don't know the percentage,  because some glass is "leaded" and other more pure and possibly less reactive.  Photons passing though the prism starting as white light at a particular anlge emerge from the glass as a rainbow effect of dispersion and with a second prism that can be collected to regenerate white light exiting the second prism.

A lens that focuses photons in a beam that has great energy of intensity to start a fire or boil fluid or roast something with solar energy would appear to be concentrating energy. how ever that energy is being concentrated in the lens and can be transferred with its super hot focal point on a second lens without melting it down or interacting with any apparent energy release.  It can even pass though the air and do not much of anything until something that would be affected is introduced at the focal point  or the zone of higher intensity.    That really suggests only code is being sent, collected and concentrated.  Not all atoms or molecules will interact and across the periodic table you might end up with a yes and no matrix by degree of potential that shifts along the electro magnetic spectrum of types of photons we can identify.

We could define a force as something that is like kicking.  photons do not behave as if a kick.  A photon directed at the back of a rocket to use it as propulsion transfers some level of angular momentum to the atoms in the rocket causing at least some charge that dislodges possibly electrons and those electrons being dislodged and having a charge allow electrons from shear probability to move from the interior of the rocket to the atoms that had an electron disengage.  which is what gives the rocket thrust of light.  really it turns out to be an statistically present extra electron with one disengaged off the surface to some degree and there is then a net negative charge of that extra electron brought there by statistical probability which actually is what drives the thrust forward of the rocket.  The same sort of added electrons is what causes thrust with rocket engines that don't use fuel.  Of course there are many more than one single extra electron charge.  the more the better the thrust forward in equal and opposite  reaction to the charge.   which is the secret of the ion engine.   It is also the secret of the radiometers in my radiometer proof that shows conclusively that gravity is completely thermodynamic....which really means a similar type of ion thrust do to connection of charged particles that are locked in to the system  In my old radiometer proof it became clear that light is not imparting energy on atoms and molecules and not force by angular momentum that leads to ionization and surface repulsion/ rarified gas repulsion.  The discovery now that photons only transmit code then also supports the gravity thesis and the radiometer proof.  If light actually did have a force of light like a kick it would behave very differently than we observe it..  just because ultra violet light can instantly scorch your skin with a sunburn does not mean it is transferring that energy to your skin.  It can mean that your skin is receiving code that causes energy already apparent to the atoms to behave in a way that releases energy they already possess

Atoms espeically in DNA have to be able to communicate with each other. The magic of DNA and it's morfologoy and functions is much less a mystery once you realize that photons are just code and coding.

Ah so you were taught that plants get their energy by soaking up sun light.  That is what you were taught.  what seems to really be happening is that plant are receiving code from sunlight and translating that code into a plant language that allows them to grow  and thrive.

Meselson–Stahl experiment - Wikipedia, th000e free encyclopedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meselson%E2%80%93Stahl_experiment It is hard to believe that no one before has realized that for DNA to replicate itself , at any rate of speed, it has to access a vast pool of possible molecules/ atomic structures and piece it's complementary new mirror image together.  The only way that can happen is with interactions that work like communication.  how can a receptor decide which molecules and atoms it needs to peace together to complement itself?  It is a huge puzzle for something as complicated as a DNA molecule of any size.   What causes the ease of synthesis ?  first we assume it happens in a cell and the cell pre-prepares the base ingredients and elements. the cell does it's photosynthesis thing or eats other organisms or plants and fills itself with all the necessary elements as per the idea of nutrition. So when dna is ready to re synthesize anything the building blocks are already there from feeding.  of course we say nutrition also brings energy into the cell to make that all possible. still there is a huge pool of ingredients and maybe not always  full nutrition  to have absolutely every required thing need to synthesize it's copies.   That still does not explain the process.  The process is absolutely more of receptors and reception articles finding each other by some means and not "energy" just because a cell is warm with energy would not mean it can replicate itself as a result. atoms and molecules jut vibrate with energy /
if I spill a 2000 piece puzzle or a 400 000,000 piece puzzle on the floor I can't just spend a few minutes or seconds piecing everything together.  I can  how ever pick up all the pieces and put them back in the box on top of the table.  When the pieces fall on the floor the probability of the pieces coming together to make that scene of Paris and the Eifel tower by themselves is near impossible but that is what DNA is able to do.  so if you have call letters on the back of each puzzle piece the way to get it together fastest would be for the pieces already assembled to call out to the pieces that fell on the floor to come to it.  That piece might also communicate it's desire to get to it's proper spot too.

What is fascinating is if you take the medium of protoplasm inside a cell with active DNA that is replicating itself and other compounds for the cell is that at that level in our cosmos things don't move very fast. the forces we have that give us water surface tension rather tend to keep  molecules in  a spot where they don't move around a lot . they can't they are interlocked and so stuff dissolved in water is also interlocked.   The dark photon theory provides an immediate explanation it also explains some of the apparent weirdness of quantum mechanics as the morphology of the process requires communication not just  having instant  bonding by valances. 

Did you know a concentrating lens was used to oxydize metals that helped in the discovcery of the invididual elements of chemistry? The assumption it was energy from the sun. Not so sure anymore. I say it has to be code for energy not energy itself.

Yes it has the effect of energy ...photons but that does not mean it is transmitting energy but rather just the code to change the energy state of mater otherwise photons would be capable of interacting with each other in space which they cannot do....that led to this analysis  And Now if mind blowing was a state of nature transmitted by code ...then I am on to something  really really big.  There mysteries of the physical world that we take for granted .  such as how DNA can signal so many different kinds of atoms and molecules instanteously and create forms and functions. How do crystals know to take forms they do?

I am getting closer than ever to having a proof that photons are code only and not energy as is the normal scientific theory. I am now looking at the obvious. States of mater , solid, liquid and gas states. That's because we can bombard mater with photons to change the state of mater. The question then is how atoms in a state of mater know what their state of mater is? That's because of the coding though it is over a vast range of probabilities. The other proof comes f...orm the DNA molecules . in a cell structure or some medium they can function...they some how find the molecules and atoms they need in a large pool of molecules and atoms to do what they do when they replicate etc, That is not so easy to do. they actually have to communicate with other atoms to find which fits where and leave the rest out of the pool. The curious thing is that it happens really fast so all those elements have to be there and ready it not like a chemistry set experiment ...everything is in the same pool or brine and it can't sort it self. So the proof is going to be rather mind blowing. photons are misfired communications or longer distance relays sometimes. how fast dna can replicate itself and organize atoms and molecules in the general local environment to create functioning living organisms is amazing . cant just happen with chemistry as we know it has to have that communications property of dark photons.

Dark Photons Allow Atomic Particles, Atoms , Molecules To Communicate With Each Other. Communications Between Particles Is Normal Subatomic Reality.

When atoms radiate electromagnetism what is happening is a failed communication- A failed link between atomic particles and or subatomic particles.  One of the most curious things about the discovery of both the elements and the inter related electromagnetic spectrum is how many of the interruptions  used to discover the elements and isolate them in the beginning of chemistry was due to oxidization  or burning or  deoxidization .  Oxygen proved to be a rather key element in the beginning of the discovery process.  We are far beyond that now with the complete spectrum of electromagnetism and a complete or nearly complete periodic table of elements. What is the point?  We can use the mass spectrometer to identify origins in terms of elements of electromagnetic wave lengths .  So in a simple way we have actually entered communications with the sub atomic/ atomic and molecular realities.  Our computer processers are getting closer to being able to directly cause interactions between subatomic particles, atoms and molecules at any of those levels.  DNA sciences are also showing we can possibly directly link computers to building  our own sequences of DNA and possibly soon completely out of the blue with use of some sort of 3D printing device.  Therefore don't worry that Moore's Law exhausts itself.  Once it is understood that we can directly communicate with atoms, sub atomic particles and molecules directly we can change the physical universe in a completely perverse way , or so it initially seems, to conditional multi variable probability. Ok so we can play God more or less at any scale and at a significant distance from  our own area of habitation.  That is we could transform something like the moon by communicating directly with it's atoms and molecules by transmitting the signal with the right kind of effectiveness.  Magic?  Not at all.  It is still a mater of conditional multivariable probability just because we humans fool ourselves into thinking that the arbitrary is always a conscious decision.  We artists know that the arbitrary is random .  We could all paint Rothko looking paintings even if we never heard of one or seen one before but that does not mean our arbitrary will is not random.  It would be a manifestation of randomness for an artist to choose that Rothko style of painting over another style of painting even if Rothko was untalented and could paint no better than that in any other form.  The arbitrary is random thus.  Compare that to Schroder's living and dead cat.

Electromagnetism thus as dark photons , that have not radiated into space because of some mishap in nature, are there within the structure of mater to hold mater together and also account for gravity as per my new laws of physics radiometer proof which I needlessly have to mention.  Mater is not held together just because of valences as explained by chemistry text books . No. It is held together and organized by communications between particles at all scales by using those dark photons in interactive ways.  Of course it would seem to be all about probabilities where a probability is that something interacts with something else as an event.  The idea that atoms interact with each other is the old idea.  The new idea is that atoms interact via interchangeable communications using dark photons and in fact atoms probably also define their own characteristics or transform them when at different states of mater by retaining or releasing the dark photons.  Photons as code can re-enter the dark photon state transferring some level of angular momentum from one electron to another.  This is  going to be known as Lex's Law which will expand Moore's law to the extreme once engineers figure out what I am saying.  All the building blocks are available to start rethinking the physical world and manipulating it accordingly. The first thing is to figure out the code by looking at the broken bonds comparing the periodic table and the EM spectrum.  There are lots of variables in this communication. The universe is complicated.  Maybe computers are already building viruses from scratch  as they maybe making 3d Nano technology particles.  Beware what seems like our arbitrary decisions after that is probably completely random.

Electro-magnetic "EXO-SOULS" of objects and beings....And the Spectral Code underlying all of them.

Yes it will be possible to make a complete human electromagnetic map at some point to recreate duplicate humans in an instant with a sort of 3D printer in the not so distant future.. These mass spectrometers are just primitive compared to what can be expected to accomplish this. so now I am looking for companies making mass spectrometers for life sciences. coupled with super computers we can actually send people across space and time as they do in star trek except we have ...the original and the duplicate so the duplicates can be expendable. mapping a human electro magnetic binding energy is going to take trillions and trillions of data points that need to be accessed simultaneously. I suspect that the part of DNA science we don't yet understand is the exo-soul area of study where we understand how genes are expressed from the code to a form such complicated living cells. There are many chemical bonds between atoms and molecules that go from what seems a 2 dimensional DNA code model to full 3D organisms. right now biologists look at receptors and proteins that result but the god like attributes of what DNA accomplishes are really unexplained Genes found that sequence molecules but then it seems there are not enough DNA connections to connect all the various other gene produced molecules.--somewhere there is a magic leap. So we might just find that the electro-magnetic spectrum solves that problem.

The problem with this thesis is that we only observe radiation from the exterior either generated from within or reflected from elsewhere.  We don't have Electro Magnetic x-ray vision actually even with life form mass spectrometry .   That does not mean that we won't at some point.  With flora and fauna we might be able at some point to map out an em spectrum map generated from the complete DNA genome?  That will take enormous computer power that takes into consideration probability as the DNA might not always set every single possible trait as some are adaptive or from a random pool of possible outcomes.  

Looking at stars and magnetic stars and other cosmic phenomena we also can't generate a detailed inner map of what we might infer happens with dark photons.  At some point maybe exploding stars will be observed from the onset of explosions to see what their more complicated make up is within.  imaging the thermal radiation with the ability to discern what is where and how when the explosion happens is blinding but still one presumes the spectrum reaching earth or our observatory is going to be more complex and have some duration to pick apart and study.

My thermodynamic theory of gravity looks more and more correct/ it seems Newton will win over Einstein in the longer run....

up to 80 seconds of the most intense fireball flashes.... http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19990018164 I am excited by the whole coding theory of photons now because it totally supports my gravity link to thermodynamics. In stead of ending up with a mass spectrometer /spectrum of symbolic it now just goes solid state where photons have to exist as bonding and binding energy in atoms and their subatomic particles. What we get to observe is just the outcasts. Here is an ex...ample of collisions where the outcast photons are extremely prolific. Most of the energy in the collision however remained within the mass of Jupiter and was resolved into the planet in a variety of ways. The idea that photons communicate makes perfect sense because it explains how valence bonding might work where the photons stitch electrons from several atoms together and either are in both places at once or interchangeable. It means an entire body of mass like the earth or the sun has subatomic particles in communication almost at the speed of light with the rest of the particles in those huge orbs. I kind of got that sense with the Archimedes discovery of mass displacement because mass is pretty much displaced immediately everywhere.

It really does seem that all particles in an object with gravity holding them together as one of the main forces such as a comet made of debris held together mostly by gravity--that all particles are linked by binding energy that flows though the entire object though not necessarily will all bonds being strong or the strongest bonds possible....

now we hear about EM propulsion seemingly possible...but is quantum anything ?  or just a mater of conversion of photons from lower frequencies to higher more energetic frequencies putting angular momentum into systems of mater?  Explain how exactly a fuel flame shooting out of a rocket causes thrust in a vacuum of space?  The flame is expelled and the equal and opposite reaction is to send the rocket forward though as fuel is used up momentum should suffer somewhat.  Really what the flame is doing is changing the angular momentum of particles so already our rockets with fuel may be equivalents to the EM thesis or fantasy which ever it is as I can't tell from reading about the experiments whether it real or not yet.  I am more concerned with black body radiation which is essentially dark photons binding up entire planets in a sort of unison of being / energy.

,.,.,.,.

Jupiter did not have the right kind of fuel to make these large fireball blasts planetary. With the earth and its high percentage of oxygen these fireballs would have spread much further leading to asphyxiation of animals not underground in caves or in water with dissolved oxygen, The origin of coal beds worldwide was from oxygen free burning of carbon based biomass and it all may have happened suddenly. I suspect that several large extinction periods would have occurred 1. with the comets now suspected and 2. with the oxygen levels burned away in a giant flash with relatively quick duration maybe just 80 seconds or less. forests might continue burning longer smoldering to charcoal with much less oxygen to fuel those fires or even be extinguished. there is reason to believe oxygen levels may have been higher with larger terrestrial reptiles running around to allow their faster metabolism?

I had no idea but now I get it. photons are broken communications between atoms and subatomic particles. The whole universe is held together by it's own internal 'radio station' . Those people at seti maybe looking in entirely the wrong place(s) That atomic structure has communications networks within it. strange but seemingly true. The whole universe may actually work as if there is a monitary system with photons as the medium of exchange.

I had no idea but now I get it. photons are broken communications between atoms and subatomic particles. The whole universe is held together by it's own internal 'radio station' . Those people at seti maybe looking in entirely the wrong place(s) That atomic structure has communications networks within it. strange but seemingly true. The whole universe may actually work as if there is a monitary system with photons as the medium of exchange.

Electromagnetic spectrum is coding, Photons at long distance can be light photons or dark photons , the dark being those that send code as bonding energy which are not intercepted at any great distance away from where coding is pratical.

yes the coding effects of electro magnetism is of practical consequence where undetected between atoms and subatomic particles.  The coding serves a definite purpose at close range as bonding and it is coded because bonds are communicated not just from one atomic / subatomic particle to another but from both to one an other.  So it is broken  bonds that produce what we "see" as photons in the em spectrum.  starts sounding a bit corny and it really is.  We should have suspected such after the discovery of how DNA works.  With DNA there are strong and weak bonds involved but rarely any photons discharged as the photons are involved but are involved as dark photons at short ranges.  Fire breaks bonds of molecules and from that we get visible light and other photons. Those photons in the right dense material would never surface to travel outside the mass they were in and would have a practical purpose possibly so they would never otherwise be emitted to become visible at some greater distance . 

Ah, the concept of dark photons...close range between atoms and subatomic partlicles...as "bonding energy" well more like bonding communications with syntax....

Yes Dark Photons exist and their coding is bonding energy .  What is remarkable is we cannot actually prove that a photon is bonding energy even if we observe the bond coming apart and the photon hitting our retina that's because when it is bonding energy it really has no energy as it is just as much a code being sent as a photon is code to unlock energy already existent in substance elsewhere.  So I can't prove anything essentially until I show why coding can or cannot bond atoms.  I am looking at incandescent light and flames burning where bonds are breaking with gas flying away so bonding is un-bonding.  not sure I want any proof by inference or deduction because that coding thing is dark when it s bonding.  bonding has syntax and it literal is in code for atoms and subatomic particles?  maybe so .  we don't bond positive and negative sides of magnets without sharing the bonds and not all bonds are going to happen everywhere as each set needs an angular momentum coding to bond....with angular momentum what comes around goes around so the communication with code may be the bond. photons wasted in bonding can send the communications far away to be seen as visible light or other wavelengths by detectors.

still thinking this out but it does make sense.  we know angular momentum creates bonding energy and that photons are just code for levels of that angular momentum...so I probably figured it out already but....still have to relate it to other phenomena.  Not communicated code is not energy .  We have economic markets that bind people and their industries together with mediums of exchange like dollars.  dollars have no energy they are only representational code but they can bind up an huge industrial complex on multiple continents.  So it seems photons as code are more like a medium of exchange coding device....and that actually makes sense because not all subatomic particles or atoms will bind together under all circumstances.  Probability is that the can , will or won't.  It is funny how we humans interact and bind with language and that language has no actual energy or power.  we humans may have bind worthy sexual energy and drives and that may be the real binding energy but still not at a physical level our minds process the sexuality to bind with others and the mental process is the drive but not the physical energy.  Why should atoms be any different?  maybe atoms can actually think before they bind with each other in chemical reactions by following coded angular momentum signals?  Sounds totally crazy but then it sort of makes sense.

Since coding explains a lot I need to find out what happens where the code actually has some real effect and not just a transposition of some minute amount of angular momentum as much as 14 billion light years off in the total diffusion of mass and energy in the distant future thus.  The effect of photons at close range is where the issue would be and there we can not get between the photon and the substance that it interact with without being the detector and we know our eye does not bond to something because the photon interacts with the retina...how ever if the photon travels and stays in the dark as binding energy or just the code for that transposing the sympathy of the angular momentum without any flash of light visible to outsiders then  it solves a problem in understanding coding.

Unbelievable. I just stopped all photons in the universe in their place--froze them by changing the speed of light constant to zero by contacting their vacuum central authority....

So  what happens if I find a way to stop the speed of light in the entire universe?  Reviewing the theories of general and special relativity you see how integral the constant speed of light is to the whole thesis.  No mater what the velocity of mater is the impact of intercepting photons is going to have the same exact "force"  though I now consider it not a force but a coded persuasion.  So instead of building a giant super collider to find the underlying fabric of the vacuum of space, I find a way to use coded photons along spectral lines to send a message to the cosmos itself to stop every photon in it's place immediately.  (yes I may have just done it!)  Did you notice the effect?   So you are skeptical.  He can't do that.  What central authority in the universe controls all of the photons?  It must be far far away beyond our galaxy....?  Well no. As the main proponent of the study of vacuumology it seems to me that the central authority of the entire universes is one unit of empty vacuum space in the entire cosmos.  So lets say the super collider researches do discover some underlying geometry,or as Einstein called it symmetry of space, then I should be able immediately ,where ever I am in the universe, to access the central authority that will stop all photons in their place.  This is not just a thought experiment.  I propose actually proving it possible with a live experiment.  Does this mean I can also stop all the kinetic energy in the universe at the same time?  I can't say yet because mater occupies the vacuum and defines it but it is not clear if there can be any central control for mater in kinetic states --the normal for mater.  Photons if they travel in linear or curved pathways according to Einstein, require that open vacuum .distances between spots of mater in the universe is where photons travel rather inside solid mater in which they behave differently--slowing down or even disappearing or transforming to lower energy levels.  Stopping photons in their tracks  means your eye will see exactly the last thing you saw or have no input data at all. Still there would be no way to detect photons in space.  very curious. The photons themselves may have no sense of moving at all even when they are.  I rather doubt the universe's structure changes at all freezing photons in their place.  I have to do the experiment again. Don't worry you are not going to die.  I just did it and you survived if you are reading this.

What I want to do is change the frame or reference for observing photons if you understand my discovery.

Spectral Symbolism in the Universe: A whole new way to view the cosmos and maybe a clue as to how it really works.

Since the discovery that photon may not actually transmit energy though space but rather transmit a code built from the electro magnetic spectrum . The though process leads to a conclusion that there is a spectrum of mater too, also having a code.  Yes we have it codified already in the periodic table but most periodic tables do not link the electro magnetic spectrum to this separate interactive spectrum of mater that includes whole atoms, molecules and sub atomic particles.  Some elements will completely ignore photons allowing them to pass though and other will absorb or modify the photons received. But then again the whole em spectrum is not universally going to behave with all elements and vise versa.

Not only do we have this giant flow chart showing what might absorb every color of visible light but say red or blue allowing a gem stone to have a deep blue or red color as seen by our eyes but we have a vast array of possibilities and probability makes every thing possible though only where it is possible with a match between photons and sub atomic/ atomic particles.   We observe the universe now with mass spectrometers and we infer and deduce what distant planets and stars are made of looking at the mass spectrometer charts from our vaporizing various types of atoms here on earth and making a calibration. Our  astronomers are already coding.  Guess what?  The universe then has to be coding and reading code too.

I am not falling into the trap of analogy like the people who see the cosmos as one giant computer generated game  or a projected hologram.  I am just saying that the universe entirely able to send code and read it and does.  The problem is that diffuse long distance sources of photons are only going to send relatively vague information because one thing could be code for another.  I am talking about closer range. Inside the sun or the earth for example, photons are going to send code and stratify into zones of photons that send code that is received in stratified mater or even plasma.  We do already know there is stratification on the sun/ in the sun-- some by density and some by features created by electro-magnetism. There  is a sea of photons in stars that may engulf the entire body of the star and be infused though out the entire structure.  I am not concerned here with revealing the details I can see in photographs from different wave length view of the sun's surface provided by NASA's probe's observations.  I am concerned here with taking the EM spectrum and charting  the largest areas of correspondence to the periodic table and the sub atomic table of interactions to create a map or a code book for the next step in this research.   I am always surprised that the atmosphere of the earth can filter out high energy photons and not let them pass though the atmosphere let alone the center of the earth.  I am also fascinated that photons can theoretically be sent on an infinite trip in a piece of fiber optic cable that is a perfect circle.....and even if it does this at a somewhat slower rate than it would pass though a vacuum , it is not absorbed and is coded to continue passing though forever.

I am calling the new field Symbolics because I don't like terms like symbolism which gets over used in academia as an analogy for everything.  Symbolism becomes the whole point of the field of the humanities when the academics get excited about translating languages or at least by analogy. I am not trying to anthropomorphize physics or even suggest that that there is a language of the universe.  

No I am going that far because I don't know stars are communicating with other stars or that the sun really is the real mono god of the earth that we can pray to ancient Egyptian style.  I am just saying we are using a code and the universe itself appears to have active coding  but we have to decipher the relationships of the coding the way our astronomers are trying but with a computer map and symbolics dictionary of sorts to see patterns rather than to try and translate.  I actually do believe we humans can read messages we see in the cosmos just as we can see constellations but that is our fantasy....This coding is real.